Embodied Energy and Carbon Analysis of Solar Kilns for Wood Drying

This article includes the assessment of indicative life-cycle embodied energy and embodied carbon values for the construction and maintenance of two different wood-drying solar kilns (Oxford and Boral) with the same timber load capacity over an assumed service life of 20 years. The model developed in this study was analyzed using the computer software “SimaPro 7.1.8 version”; the key data libraries used were the Australian life cycle inventory library and the ecoinvent library (with data, where appropriate, adapted to the Australian region). Embodied impacts (i.e., embodied energy and embodied carbon) for the two kilns, by life cycle stages, were discussed. The total life-cycle cumulative embodied energy and embodied carbon were also discussed as functions of kiln service lives. A sensitivity analysis was included in this report in order to assess the robustness of the results against the uncertainties associated with the model assumptions and the effects of alternative material use on the life-cycle embodied impacts for the two solar kilns. In general, the Oxford kiln was found to have 37% and 43% lower life-cycle embodied energy and embodied carbon values, respectively, than the corresponding values for the Boral kiln.

[1]  F. McDougall,et al.  Integrated Solid Waste Management , 2001 .

[2]  Forbes R McDougall,et al.  Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Lifecycle Inventory , 1995 .

[3]  M. N. Haque,et al.  Modelling of Solar Kilns and The Development of An Optimised Schedule for Drying Hardwood Timber , 2006 .

[4]  G. Giacomelli,et al.  Greenhouse Covering Systems , 1993 .

[5]  Timothy A. G. Langrish,et al.  STACK-WIDE EFFECTS IN THE MODELING OF SOLAR KILNS FOR DRYING TIMBER , 2001 .

[6]  Ka Chi Lam,et al.  An audit of life cycle energy analyses of buildings , 2013 .

[7]  Robin Drogemuller,et al.  Technology, Design and Process Innovation in the Built Environment , 2009 .

[8]  Zaid Alwan,et al.  The importance of embodied energy in carbon footprint assessment , 2014 .

[9]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper , 2012 .

[10]  Janet Elizabeth Henriksen.  The value of design in reducing energy use and CO2-e impact over the life cycle of a detached dwelling in a temperate climate , 2006 .

[11]  Timothy A. G. Langrish,et al.  Numerical Simulation of a Solar Kiln Design for Drying Timber with Different Geographical and Climatic Conditions in Australia , 2014 .

[12]  Tim Grant,et al.  Quantifying the greenhouse benefits of the use of wood products in two popular house designs in Sydney, Australia , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[14]  Timothy A. G. Langrish,et al.  Performance Comparison of Two Solar Kiln Designs for Wood Drying Using a Numerical Simulation , 2015 .

[15]  Bob Falk,et al.  Wood as a sustainable building material , 2009 .

[16]  Margaret Jollands,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implications of wall assemblages designs , 2014 .

[17]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .