Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework

[1]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Multi-Sided Platforms , 2015 .

[2]  A. Gawer,et al.  Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform Leader , 2013 .

[3]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  Modularity‐as‐Property, Modularization‐as‐Process, and ‘Modularity'‐as‐Frame: Lessons from Product Architecture Initiatives in the Global Automotive Industry , 2013 .

[4]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[6]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  Dethroning an Established Platform , 2012 .

[7]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Staying power : six enduring principles for managing strategy and innovation in an uncertain world (lessons from Microsoft, Apple, Intel, Google, Toyota and more) , 2012 .

[8]  David J. Teece,et al.  Walled Garden Rivalry: The Creation of Mobile Network Ecosystems , 2011 .

[9]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[10]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Organizing Ecologies of Complex Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence From the Field , 2011 .

[12]  A. Gawer.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation , 2011 .

[13]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  The Limits of Design and Engineering Outsourcing: Performance Integration and the Unfulfilled Promises of Modularity , 2010 .

[15]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[16]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Design rules for platform leaders , 2009 .

[18]  Koichi Ogawa,et al.  The Effect of Technological Platforms on the International Division of Labor: A Case Study of Intel’s Platform Business in the PC Industry , 2009 .

[19]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation: An Introduction , 2009 .

[20]  Marc Rysman.  The Economics of Two-Sided Markets , 2009 .

[21]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[22]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Markets with Two-Sided Platforms , 2008 .

[23]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[24]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[25]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Kenneth C. Wilbur.  A Two-Sided, Empirical Model of Television Advertising and Viewing Markets , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[28]  Sada Bihari Sahu,et al.  Strategic Management Journal : a citations study , 2008 .

[29]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[30]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms , 2007 .

[31]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[32]  Susan Helper,et al.  Collaboration in Supply Chains: With and Without Trust , 2007 .

[33]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries , 2016 .

[34]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[35]  Frits K. Pil,et al.  Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage , 2006 .

[36]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[37]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[38]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[39]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Platform-Based Product Family Development , 2006 .

[40]  J. West,et al.  The Economic Realities of Open Standards : Black , White and Many Shades of Gray Joel West , 2005 .

[41]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  The Limits to Specialization: Problem Solving and Coordination in ‘Modular Networks’ , 2005 .

[43]  Nils Brunsson,et al.  Organizations and meta-organizations , 2005 .

[44]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[45]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[46]  M. Armstrong.  Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[47]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Towards integrated optimal configuration of platform products, manufacturing processes, and supply chains , 2005 .

[48]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[50]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification , 2004 .

[51]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[52]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[53]  David S. Evans.  Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-sided Platform Industries , 2003 .

[54]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[55]  Desmond Doran,et al.  Supply chain implications of modularization , 2003 .

[56]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[57]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[58]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Competition between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages , 2002 .

[59]  R. Langlois.  Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[60]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[61]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation , 2002 .

[62]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Product architecture and platforms: a conceptual framework , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[63]  Mauro Caputo,et al.  The nature of buyer‐supplier relationships in co‐design activities: The Italian auto industry case , 2002 .

[64]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-Based Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[65]  M. Mcgrath.  Product Strategy for High Technology Companies , 2000 .

[66]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[67]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[68]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[69]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[70]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[71]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[72]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[73]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[74]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[75]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[76]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[77]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .

[78]  Fb Timothy,et al.  General Purpose Technologies:Engines of Growth? Journal of Econometrics, . , 1995 .

[79]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[80]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[81]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[82]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[83]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and market Concepts in Technological Evolution : Research Policy , 1985 .

[84]  R. Sobel.  Folded, Spindled, and Mutilated: Economic Analysis and U.S. V. IBM . By Franklin M. Fisher, John McGowan, and Joen E. Greenwood. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983. xvi + 443 pp. $25.00.) , 1984, Business History Review.

[85]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[86]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[87]  R. Willig,et al.  Economies of scope , 1981 .

[88]  D. Teece.  ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISE , 1980 .

[89]  D. L. Parnas,et al.  On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules , 1972, Software Pioneers.

[90]  C. Barnard.  The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .