Structural analysis of the tongue and hyoid apparatus in a woodpecker.

UNLABELLED Woodpeckers avoid brain injury while they peck at trees up to 20Hz with speeds up to 7m/s, undergoing decelerations up to 1200g. Along with the head, beak and neck, the hyoid apparatus (tongue bone and associated soft tissues) is subjected to these high impact forces. The shape of the hyoid apparatus is unusual in woodpeckers and its structure and mechanical properties have not been reported in detail. High-resolution X-ray micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were performed and correlated with nanoindentation mapping. The hyoid apparatus has four distinct bone sections, with three joints between these sections. Nanoindentation results on cross-sectional regions of each bone reveal a previously unreported structure consisting of a stiff core and outer, more compliant shell with moduli of up to 27.4GPa and 8.5GPa, respectively. The bending resistance is low at the posterior section of the hyoid bones, indicating that this region has a high degree of flexibility to absorb impact. These new structural findings can be applied to further studies on the energy dissipation of the woodpecker during its drumming behavior, and may have implications for the design of engineered impact-absorbing structures. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Woodpeckers avoid brain injury while they peck at trees, which results in extreme impact conditions. One common adaptation in woodpeckers is the unusual shape of the elongated tongue, also called the hyoid apparatus. The relationship between the structure and mechanical properties of the bony part of the hyoid apparatus has not been previously reported. A three dimensional model of the bony tongue was developed, and the hardness and stiffness were evaluated. A new type of bone structure, which is opposite of typical skeletal bone structure was found. The combined microstructural and mechanical property analysis indicate possible energy absorption routes for the hyoid apparatus and are applicable to the design of engineered structures.

[1]  R. Aspden,et al.  Effect of the Proportion of Organic Material in Bone on Thermal Decomposition of Bone Mineral: An Investigation of a Variety of Bones from Different Species Using Thermogravimetric Analysis coupled to Mass Spectrometry, High-Temperature X-ray Diffraction, and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[2]  Sang-Hee Yoon,et al.  A mechanical analysis of woodpecker drumming and its application to shock-absorbing systems , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[3]  Peng Xu,et al.  Effect of microstructure of spongy bone in different parts of woodpecker's skull on resistance to impact injury , 2013 .

[4]  Yasuaki Seki,et al.  Structure and mechanical behavior of a toucan beak , 2005 .

[5]  Yubo Fan,et al.  Why Do Woodpeckers Resist Head Impact Injury: A Biomechanical Investigation , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  R. Livingston.  Some observations on the natural history of the tongue. , 1956, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[7]  S. Ramesh,et al.  Properties of hydroxyapatite produced by annealing of bovine bone , 2007 .

[8]  R. Cook,et al.  Advanced Mechanics of Materials , 1985 .

[9]  David J. Benson,et al.  The toucan beak: Structure and mechanical response , 2006 .

[10]  Yasuaki Seki,et al.  Toucan and hornbill beaks: a comparative study. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  E. de Margerie,et al.  Torsional resistance as a principal component of the structural design of long bones: comparative multivariate evidence in birds. , 2004, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[12]  A. Boyde,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of bone as a function of hydration state determined by nanoindentation , 2006 .

[13]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Woodpecker pecking: how woodpeckers avoid brain injury , 2006 .

[14]  Walter J. Bock,et al.  Functional and evolutionary morphology of woodpeckers , 1999 .

[15]  R. Aspden,et al.  Scanning electron microscopy of bone. , 2003, Methods in molecular medicine.

[16]  Juhachi Oda,et al.  Mechanical Evaluation of the Skeletal Structure and Tissue of the Woodpecker and Its Shock Absorbing System , 2006 .

[17]  PhilipR. A. May,et al.  WOODPECKERS AND HEAD INJURY , 1976, The Lancet.

[18]  E. Pellegrino,et al.  Mineralization in the chick embryo , 1972, Calcified Tissue Research.

[19]  supJingqiu Tang,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Flat Spiral Spring on Mechanical Elastic Energy Storage Technology , 2014 .

[20]  R. Lakes,et al.  Introduction to Biomaterials , 1992 .

[21]  Steven A Herrera,et al.  The Stomatopod Dactyl Club: A Formidable Damage-Tolerant Biological Hammer , 2012, Science.

[22]  P Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  M. Meyers,et al.  Reinforcing Structures in Avian Wing Bones , 2014 .

[24]  Herbert F. Wang,et al.  Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties. A Handbook , 1971 .

[25]  G. Ma,et al.  Numerical study of the impact response of woodpecker's head , 2012 .

[26]  F. Oswald,et al.  Effects of keratin phosphorylation on the mechanical properties of keratin filaments in living cells , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[27]  Some observations on the natural history of the tongue. , 1956 .

[28]  M. Tzaphlidou.  Bone Architecture: Collagen Structure and Calcium/Phosphorus Maps , 2008, Journal of biological physics.

[29]  Frederic Martini,et al.  Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology , 1997 .

[30]  Lizhen Wang,et al.  Comparative study of the mechanical properties, micro-structure, and composition of the cranial and beak bones of the great spotted woodpecker and the lark bird , 2011, Science China Life Sciences.

[31]  Franziska Frankfurter,et al.  The Science And Engineering Of Materials , 2016 .

[32]  Yuzhe Liu,et al.  Response of Woodpecker's Head during Pecking Process Simulated by Material Point Method , 2015, PloS one.

[33]  Dominique G. Homberger,et al.  The Lingual Apparatus of the African Grey Parrot, Psittacus erithacus Linné (Aves: Psittacidae): Description and Theoretical mechanical Analysis , 1986 .

[34]  P R May,et al.  Woodpecker drilling behavior. An endorsement of the rotational theory of impact brain injury. , 1979, Archives of neurology.

[35]  H. Fraser,et al.  A novel combinatorial approach for understanding microstructural evolution and its relationship to mechanical properties in metallic biomaterials. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[36]  M. Meyers,et al.  Structural Design Elements in Biological Materials: Application to Bioinspiration , 2015, Advanced materials.

[37]  Chengwei Wu,et al.  The novel mechanical property of tongue of a woodpecker , 2009 .

[38]  J. Currey.  The evolution of the mechanical properties of amniote bone. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  M. Horstemeyer,et al.  Hierarchical multiscale structure–property relationships of the red-bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus) beak , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[40]  PhilipR. A. May,et al.  WOODPECKERS AND HEAD INJURY , 1976, The Lancet.

[41]  Cleydson B. R. Santos,et al.  Substitution of pure Y2O3 by a mixed concentrate of rare earth oxides (CRE2O3) as sintering additive of Si3N4: a comparative study of the mechanical properties , 2003 .

[42]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Engineering Statistics , 2004, Technometrics.

[43]  D. Homberger,et al.  Morphology of the lingual apparatus of the domestic chicken, Gallus gallus, with special attention to the structure of the fasciae. , 1989, The American journal of anatomy.

[44]  G. Pharr,et al.  Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[45]  H. Keselman,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2005 .

[46]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Function-related morphological characteristics and specialized structures of the avian tongue. , 2014, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[47]  Joanna McKittrick,et al.  Anisotropy in the compressive mechanical properties of bovine cortical bone and the mineral and protein constituents. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[48]  G. Pharr,et al.  Effects of drying on the mechanical properties of bovine femur measured by nanoindentation , 1999, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[49]  K. Gerstle.  Advanced Mechanics of Materials , 2001 .

[50]  Chao Wang,et al.  Biomechanism of impact resistance in the woodpecker’s head and its application , 2013, Science China Life Sciences.

[51]  Lizhen Wang,et al.  Role of Mechanical Performance of Cranial bone in Impact Protection of Woodpecker Brain–A Finite Element Study , 2013 .

[52]  G. Pharr,et al.  An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments , 1992 .