Application Accuracy of Automatic Registration in Frameless Stereotaxy

Objective: We compared the application accuracy of an infrared-based neuronavigation system when used with a novel automatic registration with its application accuracy when standard fiducial-based registration is performed. Methods: The automatic referencing tool is based on markers that are integrated in the headrest holder we routinely use in our intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) setting and can be detected by the navigation software automatically. For navigation targeting we used a Plexiglas phantom with 32 notched rods of different heights. The phantom was fixed in the head holder and multiple optimized gradient echo slices containing the clamp-integrated markers were acquired. After that we measured a T1 MPRAGE sequence with a slice thickness of 1.0 mm for navigation. The deepest points of the surface of the rods were defined as target points in image space. In three measurement series we referenced the phantom once with 4, once with 7 fiducials and twice automatically. In one series we performed only one automatic registration. The localization error was measured 3 times per rod and registration. Results: The median localization errors for standard registration with 7 fiducials were between 1.2 and 3.05 mm. With 4 fiducials, medians were in the range from 1.87 to 2.21 mm. For the automatic registration we obtained median localization errors between 0.88 and 2.13 mm. In 6 of the 8 samples that were compared the automatic registration showed an application accuracy that was highly significantly better (p < 0.001 in most cases) than that of fiducial-based standard registration. Conclusion: The application accuracy found for automatic referencing is at least not worse than that for standard registration no matter whether 4 or 7 fiducial markers were used. Therefore, its use in the operating room is feasible. In combination with intraoperative MRI it may become a favorable alternative to standard fiducial-based registration especially when an intraoperative update of navigation data is necessary.

[1]  T. Itakura,et al.  Updating of Neuronavigation Based on Images Intraoperatively Acquired with a Mobile Computerized Tomographic Scanner: Technical Note , 2003, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[2]  P. Kelly,et al.  A Computed Tomographic Stereotactic Adaptation System , 1982 .

[3]  G. Glover,et al.  Characterization of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance imaging and its implications for stereotactic surgery. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[4]  Stefan Wolfsberger,et al.  Anatomical landmarks for image registration in frameless stereotactic neuronavigation , 2002, Neurosurgical Review.

[5]  R Steinmeier,et al.  Factors Influencing the Application Accuracy of Neuronavigation Systems , 2002, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[6]  C Giorgi,et al.  A computer controlled stereotactic arm: virtual reality in neurosurgical procedures. , 1993, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[7]  B A Kall,et al.  Results of computed tomography-based computer-assisted stereotactic resection of metastatic intracranial tumors. , 1988, Neurosurgery.

[8]  P. Kelly,et al.  Volumetric stereotactic surgical resection of intra-axial brain mass lesions. , 1988, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[9]  K. Takakura,et al.  Three-dimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): new equipment for computed tomography-guided stereotaxic surgery. , 1987, Surgical neurology.

[10]  L. Leksell,et al.  Stereotaxis and tomography a technical note , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[11]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Quantification of, Visualization of, and Compensation for Brain Shift Using Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[12]  E. Spiegel,et al.  Stereotaxic Apparatus for Operations on the Human Brain. , 1947, Science.

[13]  P J Kelly,et al.  Volumetric stereotactic resection of superficial and deep seated intraaxial brain lesions. , 1992, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[14]  B A Kall,et al.  Transposition of volumetric information derived from computed tomography scanning into stereotactic space. , 1984, Surgical neurology.

[15]  H Reinhardt,et al.  A computer-assisted device for the intraoperative CT-correlated localization of brain tumors. , 1988, European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes.

[16]  T. Krings,et al.  Course of brain shift during microsurgical resection of supratentorial cerebral lesions: limits of conventional neuronavigation , 2004, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[17]  P J Kelly,et al.  Computer-assisted stereotactic biopsy and volumetric resection of thalamic pilocytic astrocytomas. Report of 23 cases. , 1992, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[18]  D. Long,et al.  Frameless stereotaxic integration of CT imaging data: accuracy and initial applications. , 1993, Radiology.

[19]  Patrick J. Kelly,et al.  Computer-Assisted Stereotactic Biopsy and Volumetrie Resection of Thalamic Pilocytic Astrocytomas , 1992 .

[20]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Semiautomated registration using new markers for assessing the accuracy of a navigation system. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[21]  R. Brown.  A stereotactic head frame for use with CT body scanners. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[22]  J I Ausman.  On technology, science, and tea: what are we doing and why? , 2001, Surgical neurology.

[23]  D. Thomas,et al.  Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  V. Seifert,et al.  Laser Surface Scanning for Patient Registration in Intracranial Image-guided Surgery , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[25]  J. Kaspersen,et al.  Multimodal Image Fusion in Ultrasound-Based Neuronavigation: Improving Overview and Interpretation by Integrating Preoperative MRI with Intraoperative 3D Ultrasound , 2003, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[26]  I. Germano,et al.  Clinical evaluation of multimodality registration in frameless stereotaxy. , 1999, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[27]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Intraoperative compensation for brain shift. , 2001, Surgical neurology.

[28]  N. Hata,et al.  Serial Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Shift , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[29]  G. Barnett,et al.  Frameless stereotaxy with scalp-applied fiducial markers for brain biopsy procedures: experience in 218 cases. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  F. Lindseth,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of a 3D ultrasound-based neuronavigation system. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[31]  R. H. Clarke,et al.  THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE CEREBELLUM EXAMINED BY A NEW METHOD. , 1908 .

[32]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Intraoperative high-field-strength MR imaging: implementation and experience in 200 patients. , 2004, Radiology.

[33]  M. Berger,et al.  Coregistration Accuracy and Detection of Brain Shift Using Intraoperative Sononavigation during Resection of Hemispheric Tumors , 2003, Neurosurgery.