Educational Robotics as Mindtools

Although there are many studies on the constructionist use of educational robotics, they have certain limitations. Some of them refer to robotics education, rather than educational robotics. Others follow a constructionist approach, but give emphasisonly to design skills, creativity and collaboration. Some studies use robotics as an educational tool in engineering education, science and programming learning implying mindtools, but they do not give evidence of mindtool characteristics. This work proposes educational robotics as mindtools based on constructivism and especially constructionism. The positive learning results from two case studies on physics and programming teaching indicate that educational robotics can be used as mindtool ssupporting knowledge construction through the design of meaningful authentic projects, learning by doing in both the virtual and real world, facing cognitive conflicts and learning by reflection and collaboration.

[1]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Designing, Developing, and Implementing a Course on LEGO Robotics for Technology Teacher Education , 2003 .

[2]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids , 2005, IDC '05.

[3]  Bradley Barker,et al.  Examining 4-H Robotics and Geospatial Technologies in the Learning of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Topics , 2008 .

[4]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Technical school students design and develop robotic gear-based constructions for the transmission of motion , 2005 .

[5]  Tom Boyle,et al.  Design for multimedia learning , 1997 .

[6]  E. Wang,et al.  Teaching freshmen design, creativity and programming with LEGOs and Labview , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[7]  Edoardo Datteri,et al.  Explaining robotic behaviors: a case study on science education , 2012 .

[8]  Florence R. Sullivan.  Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding , 2008 .

[9]  Mitzi Vernon,et al.  Using LEGO RCX Bricks as the Platform for Interdisciplinary Design Projects , 2001 .

[10]  Ronald K. Thornton.  USING THE RESULTS OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION TO IMPROVE SCIENCE LEARNING , 1999 .

[11]  B. Cavas,et al.  The Effects of Robotics Club on the Students’ Performance on Science Process & Scientific Creativity Skills and Perceptions on Robots, Human and Society , 2012 .

[12]  M.I.G. Mota.  Work in progress - using lego mindstorms and robolab as a mean to lowering dropout and failure rate in programming course , 2007, 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports.

[13]  Seymour Papert,et al.  The Children's Machine , 1993 .

[14]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Brigitte Denis,et al.  Collaborative learning in an educational robotics environment , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Maria Satratzemi,et al.  Teaching (with) robots in secondary schools: some new and not-so-new pedagogical problems , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[17]  John Ringwood,et al.  Teaching engineering design through Lego® Mindstorms™ , 2005 .

[18]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teachers as Designers: Integrating Robotics in Early Childhood Education. , 2002 .

[19]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  The Effects Of Peer Interactions On The Development Of Technological Fluency In An Early Childhood Robotics Learning Environment , 2005 .

[20]  Gwen Nugent,et al.  The use of digital manipulatives in k-12: robotics, GPS/GIS and programming , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[21]  Chris Rogers,et al.  LEGO Engineer and RoboLab: Teaching Engineering with LabVIEW from Kindergarten to Graduate School* , 2000 .