Methodology for measuring fAPAR in crops using a combination of active optical and linear irradiance sensors: a case study in Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack)

The amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 0.4–0.7 μm) absorbed by plants for photosynthesis relative to incident radiation is defined as the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR). This is an important variable in both plant biomass production and plant growth modeling. This study investigates the application of a newly developed, linear irradiance sensor (LightScout Quantum Bar Sensor, LightScout, Spectrum Technologies, Inc. USA), to quantify fAPAR for a demonstrator crop, Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack). A protocol was devised for sensor placement to determine reflected PAR components of fAPAR and to determine the optimal time of day and sensor orientation for data collection. Coincident, top of canopy, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) measurements were also acquired with a CropCircle™ ACS-210 sensor and measurements correlated with derived fAPAR values. The optimum height of the linear irradiance sensor above soil or plant canopy was found to be 0.4 m while measuring reflected PAR. Measurement of fAPAR was found to be stable when conducted within 1 h of local solar noon in order to avoid significant bidirectional effects resulting from diurnal changes of leaf orientation relative to the vertically-placed sensor. In the row crop studied, averaging fAPAR readings derived from the linear irradiance sensor orientated across and along the plant row provided an R2 = 0.81 correlation with above-canopy NDVI. Across row sensor orientation also gave a similar correlation of R2 = 0.76 allowing the user to reduce sampling time.

[1]  L. H. Allen,et al.  Photosynthesis under field conditions , 1962 .

[2]  D. Baker,et al.  Photosynthesis Under Field Conditions. V. Further Plant Chamber Studies of the Effect of Light on Corn (Zea mays L.)1 , 1964 .

[3]  L. H. Allen,et al.  Photosynthesis Under Field Conditions. VII. Radiant Energy Exchanges Within a Corn Crop Canopy and Implications in Water Use Efficiency1 , 1964 .

[4]  R. Loomis,et al.  Vegetative Growth of Corn as Affected by Population Density. I. Productivity in Relation to Interception of Solar Radiation 1 , 1965 .

[5]  Gwynn H. Suits,et al.  The cause of azimuthal variations in directional reflectance of vegetative canopies , 1971 .

[6]  K. Mccree.  Test of current definitions of photosynthetically active radiation against leaf photosynthesis data , 1972 .

[7]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[8]  Stephan J. Maas,et al.  A Model for Calculating Light Interception by a Grain Sorghum Canopy , 1978 .

[9]  E. J. Brach,et al.  Bidirectional reflectance of crops and the soil contribution , 1979 .

[10]  E. T. Kanemasu,et al.  Assessing the interception of photosynthetically active radiation in winter wheat , 1983 .

[11]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Spectral estimates of solar radiation intercepted by corn canopies. , 1983 .

[12]  M. Bauer,et al.  Spectral estimators of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in corn canopies. , 1985 .

[13]  G. Asrar,et al.  Estimating Absorbed Photosynthetic Radiation and Leaf Area Index from Spectral Reflectance in Wheat1 , 1984 .

[14]  P. Sellers.  Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration , 1985 .

[15]  G. Campbell,et al.  Simple equation to approximate the bidirectional reflectance from vegetative canopies and bare soil surfaces. , 1985, Applied optics.

[16]  C. S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Techniques for Measuring Intercepted and Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Corn Canopies1 , 1986 .

[17]  Juhan Ross,et al.  The influence of leaf orientation and the specular component of leaf reflectance on the canopy bidirectional reflectance , 1989 .

[18]  F. Baret,et al.  Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment , 1991 .

[19]  A. J. Richardson,et al.  Vegetation indices in crop assessments , 1991 .

[20]  B. Choudhury,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity in vegetation canopies and remote sensing of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation: A modeling study , 1992 .

[21]  C. Daughtry,et al.  Spectral estimates of absorbed radiation and phytomass production in corn and soybean canopies , 1992 .

[22]  P. Pinter.  Solar angle independence in the relationship between absorbed PAR and remotely sensed data for Alfalfa , 1993 .

[23]  Agnès Bégué,et al.  Radiative transfer in shrub savanna sites in Niger: preliminary results from HAPEX-Sahel. 2. Photosynthetically active radiation interception of the woody layer , 1994 .

[24]  R. Myneni,et al.  On the relationship between FAPAR and NDVI , 1994 .

[25]  A. Bégué,et al.  A method to estimate instantaneous and daily intercepted photosynthetically active radiation using a hemispherical sensor , 1995 .

[26]  H. Mooney,et al.  Modeling the Exchanges of Energy, Water, and Carbon Between Continents and the Atmosphere , 1997, Science.

[27]  A. Pitman.  The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models , 2003 .

[28]  D. J. Mulla,et al.  Plant canopy sensor with modulated polychromatic light source. , 2004 .

[29]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[30]  T. A. Black,et al.  A MODIS-derived photochemical reflectance index to detect inter-annual variations in the photosynthetic light-use efficiency of a boreal deciduous forest , 2005 .

[31]  A. Viña,et al.  New developments in the remote estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in crops , 2005 .

[32]  Mark Trotter,et al.  Ultra low-level airborne (ULLA) sensing of crop canopy reflectance: A case study using a CropCircle TM sensor , 2009 .

[33]  David W. Lamb,et al.  Radiometry of Proximal Active Optical Sensors (AOS) for Agricultural Sensing , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[34]  J.,et al.  A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 2022 .