Evaluation of gene structure prediction programs.

We evaluate a number of computer programs designed to predict the structure of protein coding genes in genomic DNA sequences. Computational gene identification is set to play an increasingly important role in the development of the genome projects, as emphasis turns from mapping to large-scale sequencing. The evaluation presented here serves both to assess the current status of the problem and to identify the most promising approaches to ensure further progress. The programs analyzed were uniformly tested on a large set of vertebrate sequences with simple gene structure, and several measures of predictive accuracy were computed at the nucleotide, exon, and protein product levels. The results indicated that the predictive accuracy of the programs analyzed was lower than originally found. The accuracy was even lower when considering only those sequences that had recently been entered and that did not show any similarity to previously entered sequences. This indicates that the programs are overly dependent on the particularities of the examples they learn from. For most of the programs, accuracy in this test set ranged from 0.60 to 0.70 as measured by the Correlation Coefficient (where 1.0 corresponds to a perfect prediction and 0.0 is the value expected for a random prediction), and the average percentage of exons exactly identified was less than 50%. Only those programs including protein sequence database searches showed substantially greater accuracy. The accuracy of the programs was severely affected by relatively high rates of sequence errors. Since the set on which the programs were tested included only relatively short sequences with simple gene structure, the accuracy of the programs is likely to be even lower when used for large uncharacterized genomic sequences with complex structure. While in such cases, programs currently available may still be of great use in pinpointing the regions likely to contain exons, they are far from being powerful enough to elucidate its genomic structure completely.

[1]  P. Sneath,et al.  Numerical Taxonomy , 1962, Nature.

[2]  M. O. Dayhoff,et al.  Atlas of protein sequence and structure , 1965 .

[3]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Chris A. Fields,et al.  gm: a practical tool for automating DNA sequence analysis , 1990, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[5]  M S Gelfand,et al.  Computer prediction of the exon-intron structure of mammalian pre-mRNAs. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Genomic scanning for expressed sequences in Xp21 identifies the glycerol kinase gene , 1993, Nature Genetics.

[7]  David J. States,et al.  QGB: Combined Use of Sequence Similarity and Codon Bias for Coding Region Identification , 1994, J. Comput. Biol..

[8]  Yin Xu,et al.  An Improved System for Exon Recognition and Gene Modeling in Human DNA Sequence , 1994, ISMB.

[9]  M. Borodovsky,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic approaches for detecting genes in a bacterial genome. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  M H Skolnick,et al.  A probabilistic model for detecting coding regions in DNA sequences. , 1994, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[11]  Ying Xu,et al.  Constructing gene models from accurately predicted exons: an application of dynamic programming , 1994, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[12]  R. Fleischmann,et al.  The Minimal Gene Complement of Mycoplasma genitalium , 1995, Science.

[13]  E. Snyder,et al.  Identification of protein coding regions in genomic DNA. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Mikhail S. Gelfand,et al.  Prediction of Function in DNA Sequence , 1995, J. Comput. Biol..

[15]  James W. Fickett,et al.  The Gene Identification Problem: An Overview for Developers , 1995, Comput. Chem..