Organic vs. mechanistic coordination in distributed New Product Development (NPD) teams

[1]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  Sociotechnical systems design: coordination of virtual teamwork in innovation , 2016 .

[2]  José L. Roldán,et al.  Prediction-oriented modeling in business research by means of PLS path modeling: Introduction to a JBR special section , 2016 .

[3]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models , 2016 .

[4]  Jiyoung Hwang,et al.  Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption , 2016 .

[5]  Nader Ale Ebrahim,et al.  Virtual R&D Teams: A New Model for Product Development , 2015 .

[6]  Nikhil Sharma,et al.  The interacting effects of distributed work arrangements and individual dispositions on willingness to engage in sensemaking behaviors , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Task Partitioning: An Innovation Process Variable , 2015 .

[8]  Daniel Tzabbar,et al.  Bridging the Social Chasm in Geographically Distributed R&D Teams: The Moderating Effects of Relational Strength and Status Asymmetry on the Novelty of Team Innovation , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[9]  A. Schertler,et al.  Does Syndication With Local Venture Capitalists Moderate the Effects of Geographical and Institutional Distance , 2014 .

[10]  Michael Boyer O'Leary,et al.  Beyond Being There: The Symbolic Role of Communication and Identification in Perceptions of Proximity to Geographically Dispersed Colleagues , 2014, MIS Q..

[11]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[12]  H. Ernst,et al.  Subjective Distance and Team Collaboration in Distributed Teams , 2014 .

[13]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Situated Coworker Familiarity: How Site Visits Transform Relationships Among Distributed Workers , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The Concept of Distance in International Management Research , 2014 .

[15]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies , 2014 .

[16]  A. Prencipe,et al.  Does Distance Hinder Coordination? Identifying and Bridging Boundaries of Offshored Work , 2013 .

[17]  James Moultrie,et al.  Interactions in new product development: How the nature of the NPD process influences interaction between teams and management , 2013 .

[18]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing the Unexpected Across Space: Improvisation, Dispersion, and Performance in NPD Teams , 2013 .

[19]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling , 2013, Comput. Stat..

[20]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[21]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models , 2012 .

[22]  Bert Weijters,et al.  Misresponse to Reversed and Negated Items in Surveys: A Review , 2012 .

[23]  Malte Brettel,et al.  Cross-functional Integration and New Product Performance — The Impact of National and Corporate Culture , 2012 .

[24]  Ronaldo Parente,et al.  The effect of supply chain integration, modular production, and cultural distance on new product development: A dynamic capabilities approach , 2011 .

[25]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[26]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Coordinating decentralized research and development laboratories: A survey analysis , 2011 .

[27]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  Ulrike de Brentani,et al.  Managing New Product Development Teams in a Globally Dispersed NPD Program , 2010 .

[29]  Søren Salomo,et al.  Information Processing and Firm-Internal Environment Contingencies: Performance Impact on Global New Product Development , 2010 .

[30]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  On the alignment of the purposes and views of process models in project management , 2010 .

[31]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Market Orientation and R&D Effectiveness in High‐Technology Firms: An Empirical Investigation in the Biotechnology Industry* , 2010 .

[32]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Multiple Informant Methodology: A Critical Review and Recommendations , 2010 .

[33]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  The Moderating Effects of Virtuality on the Antecedents and Outcome of NPD Team Trust , 2009 .

[34]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Crossing Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Globally Distributed Projects: A Relational Model of Coordination Delay , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Elisa Mattarelli,et al.  Use of collaborative technologies and knowledge sharing in co-located and distributed teams: Towards the 24-h knowledge factory , 2009, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Offshoring and the global distribution of work: Implications for task interdependence theory and practice , 2009 .

[37]  Gaby Odekerken-Schröder,et al.  Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchial construct models: guidelines and impirical illustration , 2009 .

[38]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits* , 2009 .

[39]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? , 2009 .

[40]  Tom McBride,et al.  The mechanisms of project management of software development , 2008, J. Syst. Softw..

[41]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Planning and Uncertainty in New Product Development , 2008 .

[42]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[43]  Jean Wilson,et al.  Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close , 2008 .

[44]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Organizational antecedents to and consequences of service business orientations in manufacturing companies , 2008 .

[45]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Developing a knowledge-based perspective on coordination: The case of global software projects , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[46]  P. Puranam,et al.  Integrating Distributed Work: Comparing Task Design, Communication and Tacit Coordination Mechanisms , 2008 .

[47]  Birgit Verworn,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of Japanese New Product Development Projects: Impact on Success and Differences between Incremental and Radical Projects , 2007 .

[48]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Team Stressors, Management Support, and Project and Process Outcomes in New Product Development Projects , 2007 .

[49]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Mediators between coordination and IS project performance , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[50]  David A. Griffith,et al.  The Role of Globalization, Time Acceleration, and Virtual Global Teams in Fostering Successful Global Product Launches , 2007 .

[51]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[52]  H. Ernst,et al.  How Teamwork Matters More as Team Member Dispersion Increases , 2007 .

[53]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation , 2006 .

[54]  M. Hoegl,et al.  TEAM GOAL COMMITMENT IN INNOVATIVE PROJECTS , 2006 .

[55]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs , 2006 .

[56]  Anca Metiu,et al.  Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[57]  L. Lemieux-Charles,et al.  What Do We Know about Health Care Team Effectiveness? A Review of the Literature , 2006, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[58]  C. Saunders,et al.  Editor's comments: PLS: a silver bullet? , 2006 .

[59]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[60]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[61]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Interfirm Modularity and Its Implications for Product Development , 2005 .

[62]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[63]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[64]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[65]  A. Kaplan,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis , 2004 .

[66]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  A dimensional analysis of geographically distributed project teams: A case study , 2004 .

[67]  M. Baba,et al.  The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team , 2004 .

[68]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Can absence make a team grow stronger? , 2004, Harvard business review.

[69]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams , 2004 .

[70]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[71]  Soundar Kumara,et al.  Advances in e-manufacturing: foundations of market-based collaborative planning and control of distributed multiple product development projects , 2003 .

[72]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The evolution of coordination in outsourced software development projects: a comparison of client and vendor perspectives , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[73]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams , 2003 .

[74]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Problem - Solving Oscillations in Complex Engineering Projects , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[75]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[76]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[77]  David Wilemon,et al.  Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects , 2003 .

[78]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[79]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User’s Guide , 2002 .

[80]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Software Project Coordination , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[81]  John Child,et al.  Organizations Unfettered: Organizational Form in an Information-Intensive Economy , 2001 .

[82]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[83]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance , 2001 .

[84]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[85]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[86]  J. Edwards.  Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[87]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[88]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[89]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  Information Technology and New Product Development: Opportunities and Pitfalls , 2000 .

[90]  Jorge F. S. Gomes,et al.  Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development , 2000 .

[91]  Hélène Sicotte,et al.  Integration mechanisms and R&D project performance☆ , 2000 .

[92]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work , 1999, GROUP.

[93]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance , 1999 .

[94]  Mark Vandenbosch,et al.  Project Complexity and Efforts to Reduce Product Development Cycle Time , 1999 .

[95]  K. Law,et al.  Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs , 1999 .

[96]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Multidimensional Constructs M Structural Equation Analysis: An Illustration Using the Job Perception and Job Satisfaction Constructs , 1999 .

[97]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[98]  Dov Dvir,et al.  In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors , 1998 .

[99]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[100]  R. Boutellier,et al.  Management of Dispersed Product Development Teams: The Role of Information Technologies , 1998 .

[101]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[102]  G. Reger.  Benchmarking the Internationalisation and Co-Ordination of R&D of Western European and Japanese Multi-National Corporations , 1997 .

[103]  R. Liden,et al.  Task Interdependence as a Moderator of the Relation Between Group Control and Performance , 1997 .

[104]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[105]  William H. Bommer,et al.  ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1995 .

[106]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[107]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[108]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[109]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[110]  William E. Souder,et al.  INTEGRATING MARKETING AND R&D PROJECT PERSONNEL WITHIN INNOVATION PROJECTS: AN INFORMATION UNCERTAINTY MODEL* , 1992 .

[111]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? , 1990, CSCW '90.

[112]  J. Pinto,et al.  Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development , 1990 .

[113]  J. Jarillo,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[114]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies , 1989 .

[115]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[116]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[117]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[118]  Petra M. Bosch-Sijtsema,et al.  Getting it done: Critical success factors for project managers in virtual work settings , 2013 .

[119]  Ryan T. Wright,et al.  Operationalizing Multidimensional Constructs in Structural Equation Modeling: Recommendations for IS Research , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[120]  Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi,et al.  PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement , 2010 .

[121]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  An Introduction to a Permutation Based Procedure for Multi-Group PLS Analysis: Results of Tests of Differences on Simulated Data and a Cross Cultural Analysis of the Sourcing of Information System Services Between Germany and the USA , 2010 .

[122]  Wynne W. Chin.  How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .

[123]  Mcdp Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  The Effect of IT and Co-location on Knowledge Dissemination , 2007 .

[124]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[125]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[126]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[127]  Guido Reger,et al.  Coordinating globally dispersed research centers of excellencethe case of Philips Electronics , 2004 .

[128]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[129]  K. Ulrich,et al.  A Review of the Literature , 1960, Understanding Mentally Disordered Offenders.

[130]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory , 1999 .

[131]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Product Portfolio Management : Practices and Performance , 1999 .

[132]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[133]  D. Deschoolmeester,et al.  R&D-marketing integration mechanisms, communication flows, and innovation success , 1994 .

[134]  Emily S. Reber,et al.  Directional Questions Direct Self-Conceptions , 1993 .

[135]  Jacob Cohen.  QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer , 1992 .

[136]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product Development in the World Auto Industry , 1987 .

[137]  Raymond K. Mueller,et al.  A Method for Solving the Indefinite Quadratic Programming Problem , 1970 .

[138]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management the Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R & D Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .