Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system.

Four experiments were conducted to study the nature of visual translation invariance in humans. In all the experiments, subjects were trained to discriminate between a previously unknown target and two non-target distractors presented at a fixed retinal location to one side of the fixation point. In a subsequent test phase, this performance was compared with the performance when the patterns were presented either centrally at the fixation point or at a location on the other side of the fixation point, opposite to the location where the patterns were learned, but where acuity was identical to what it was at the learned location. Two different experimental paradigms were used. One used an eye movement control device (Experiment 1) to ensure the eye could not move relative to the patterns to be learned. In the other three experiments, presentation duration of the patterns was restricted to a short enough period to preclude eye movements. During the training period in Experiments 1 and 2, presentation location of the patterns was centered at 2.4 deg in the periphery, whereas in Experiments 3 and 4 presentation eccentricity was reduced to 0.86 and 0.49 deg. In all four experiments performance dropped when the pattern had to be recognized at new test positions. This result suggests that the visual system does not apply a global transposition transformation to the retinal image to compensate for translations. We propose that, instead, it decomposes the image into simple features which themselves are more-or-less translation invariant. If in a given task, patterns can be discriminated using these simple features, then translation invariance will occur. If not, then translation invariance will fail or be incomplete.

[1]  G. V. Dearborn Recognition under objective reversal. , 1899 .

[2]  M. D. Arnoult Shape discrimination as a function of angular orientation of the stimuli. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[4]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[5]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[6]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Visual transformation of size. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  William R. Uttal An autocorrelation theory of visual form detection: A computer experiment and a computer model , 1975 .

[8]  L. Cooper Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Size and Position Invariance in the Visual System , 1978, Perception.

[10]  M. Corballis,et al.  Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[11]  D H Foster,et al.  Visual Comparison of Random-Dot Patterns: Evidence concerning a Fixed Visual Association between Features and Feature-Relations , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[13]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Hans Burkhardt,et al.  On invariant sets of a certain class of fast translation-invariant transforms , 1980 .

[15]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Does pattern matching require the normalization of size and orientation? , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  David H. Foster,et al.  Visual Comparison of Rotated and Reflected Random-Dot Patterns as a Function of Their Positional Symmetry and Separation in the Field* , 1981 .

[17]  E L Schwartz,et al.  Cortical Anatomy, Size Invariance, and Spatial Frequency Analysis , 1981, Perception.

[18]  Jack F. Gerrissen Theory and Model of the Human Global Analysis of Visual Structure , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[19]  M. G. Eley,et al.  Identifying rotated letter-like symbols , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Local log polar frequency analysis in the striate cortex as a basis for size and orientation invariance , 1985 .

[21]  Ben Kröse A structure description of visual information , 1985, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[22]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Size in the visual processing of faces and words. , 1985 .

[23]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Size in the visual processing of faces and words. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  D. Foster,et al.  Horizontal-vertical structure in the visual comparison of rigidly transformed patterns. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[26]  E. Capaldi,et al.  The organization of behavior. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.