An older adult perspective on digital legacy

A number of technologies have been developed to help users manage their digital legacy, however few user contributions in this space have been solicited from older adults. This is surprising given that older people may have to cope with a digital inheritance but be poorly equipped to do so. The current paper describes three phases of research that explore older adults understanding of and preferences for digital legacy. In phase I, we conducted a large-scale scoping exercise designed to elicit relevant scenarios around digital legacy. In phase II, we presented older adults with a selection of legacy prompts and provocations in order to promote a discussion of digital bequests. In phase III we used life-logging scenarios as prompts in an inter-generational workshop designed to elicit discussion between digital natives and older adults. This work contributes to our understanding of digital legacy from the perspective of older adults and emphasises the importance they place on family, personalisation and control of digital legacy support.

[1]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Theatre as an intermediary between users and CHI designers , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  Predrag V. Klasnja,et al.  Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design , 2008, DIS '08.

[3]  James C. McElroy,et al.  The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Yang Wang,et al.  "I regretted the minute I pressed share": a qualitative study of regrets on Facebook , 2011, SOUPS.

[5]  Ronald Baecker,et al.  Dealing with death in design: developing systems for the bereaved , 2011, CHI.

[6]  Tiziana Catarci,et al.  Digital memories in an era of ubiquitous computing and abundant storage , 2006, CACM.

[7]  Corina Sas,et al.  Design for forgetting: disposing of digital possessions after a breakup , 2013, CHI.

[8]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Passing on & putting to rest: understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies , 2010, CHI.

[9]  Mary Lewis,et al.  The human remains , 2011 .

[10]  L. Bannon.  Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: the dualityof memory and implications for ubiquitous computing , 2006 .

[11]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  A Design Perspective on Three Technology Heirlooms , 2012, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  K. Turnhout,et al.  Communicating Commemoration , 2008 .

[13]  Andrew Hudson-Smith,et al.  Approaches to interacting with digital object memories in the real world , 2012, UbiComp '12.

[14]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects , 2010, TCHI.

[15]  Linda Little,et al.  Ubiquitous systems and the family: thoughts about the networked home , 2009, SOUPS.

[16]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Lifelogging: Issues of Identity and Privacy with Memories for Life , 2008 .

[17]  John L. Arnott,et al.  Designing social networking sites for older adults , 2010, BCS HCI.

[18]  Elizabeth Thiry.  Designing a digital reminiscing system for older adults , 2013, ASAC.

[19]  K. O’Hara,et al.  Lifelogging: Privacy and empowerment with memories for life , 2008 .

[20]  Gordon Bell,et al.  Living With a Lifetime Store , 2003 .

[21]  Linda Little,et al.  Location tracking: views from the older adult population. , 2013, Age and ageing.

[22]  Pgce,et al.  Online memorials: the virtual as the new vernacular , 2012 .

[23]  David Frohlich,et al.  The Memory Box , 2000 .

[24]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design documentaries: inspiring design research through documentary film , 2006, DIS '06.

[25]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings , 2012, CHI.

[26]  Michael Massimi,et al.  Dying, death, and mortality: towards thanatosensitivity in HCI , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  Participation and publics: supporting community engagement , 2012, CHI.

[28]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Technology heirlooms?: considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials , 2012, CHI.

[29]  L. Burgio,et al.  Legacy activities as interventions approaching the end of life. , 2008, Journal of palliative medicine.

[30]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Contravision: exploring users' reactions to futuristic technology , 2010, CHI.

[31]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Digital artifacts as legacy: exploring the lifespan and value of digital data , 2013, CHI.

[32]  Wendy Moncur,et al.  From death to final disposition: roles of technology in the post-mortem interval , 2012, CHI.

[33]  Siân E. Lindley.  Before I Forget: From Personal Memory to Family History , 2012, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  T. Satterfield,et al.  In Search of Value Literacy: Suggestions for the Elicitation of Environmental Values , 2001, Environmental Values.

[35]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Issues of the social web interaction project faced with afterlife digital legacy , 2011, IHC+CLIHC.

[36]  Chris Speed,et al.  Enhancing the 'second-hand' retail experience with digital object memories , 2012, UbiComp '12.

[37]  Judy Kay,et al.  MEMENTO: a digital-physical scrapbook for memory sharing , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[38]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[39]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[40]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[41]  Richard Banks,et al.  Matters of life and death: locating the end of life in lifespan-oriented hci research , 2011, CHI.

[42]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Invisible design: exploring insights and ideas through ambiguous film scenarios , 2012, DIS '12.

[43]  David Kirk.  On the Design of Technology Heirlooms , 2008 .