Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.

Distinctive aspects of a scene can capture attention even when they are irrelevant to one's goals. The authors address whether visually unique, unexpected, but task-irrelevant features also tend to hold attention. Observers searched through displays in which the color of each item was irrelevant. At the start of search, all objects changed color. Critically, the foveated item changed to an unexpected color (it was novel), became a color singleton (it was unique), or both. Saccade latency revealed the time required to disengage overt attention from this object. Singletons resulted in longer latencies, but only if they were unexpected. Conversely, unexpected items only delayed disengagement if they were singletons. Thus, the time spent overtly attending to an object is determined, at least in part, by task-irrelevant stimulus properties, but this depends on the confluence of expectation and visual salience.

[1]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES , 2007 .

[4]  Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[7]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[8]  M G Saslow,et al.  Latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[10]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Scene Perception for Psycholinguists. , 2004 .

[12]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[13]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. Henderson,et al.  Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real-world scenes: Effects of object–scene consistency , 2008 .

[16]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .

[17]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  S. Yantis Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .

[21]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons , 2000, Vision Research.

[22]  J. Henderson Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  A. Friedman Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  N. Mackworth,et al.  The gaze selects informative details within pictures , 1967 .

[26]  J. Henderson,et al.  High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements , 2003, Vision Research.

[28]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  E. Reingold,et al.  Saccadic Inhibition and Gaze Contingent Research Paradigms , 2000 .

[31]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  J. Henderson Regarding Scenes , 2007 .

[33]  J. Henderson,et al.  Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[35]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[36]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[37]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[38]  Graham L. Pierce,et al.  Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[40]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  P. de Graef,et al.  Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.

[42]  Valentina V. Kuskova,et al.  Inappropriate capture by diversionary dynamic elements , 2002 .

[43]  D. E. Irwin Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing , 2004 .

[44]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Sven-Thomas Graupner,et al.  Surprise, surprise: two distinct components in the visually evoked distractor effect. , 2007, Psychophysiology.