Length of prostate biopsy cores: does it impact cancer detection?

INTRODUCTION The detection of prostate carcinoma relies on adequate sampling. We aimed to evaluate whether core length is a significant biopsy parameter in the detection of cancer, especially in the low risk cancer category group. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed pathology reports of 197 patients (2196 biopsy cores) undergoing initial transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. A multivariate analysis of age, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, prostate gland volume, total number of cores and length of biopsy cores was performed. Secondary analyses included stratification by Gleason score. Single core analysis was done to calculate a workable cut off value for core length with optimal sensitivity and specificity in carcinoma detection. RESULTS Mean age, PSA, prostate volume, and total number of cores were 66.9 years, 12.6 ng/mL, 47.2 cc and 11.1 cores, respectively. Whereas detection of cancer was significantly associated with advanced age (p < 0.01) and smaller prostate volumes (p < 0.001), PSA levels (p = 0.40) and number of cores (p = 0.20) were not significant predictive factors. Assessment of biopsy core lengths showed that cores harboring cancer (n = 307, average length 14.1 mm) were significantly longer than benign cores (n = 1889, average length = 13.2 mm) (p < 0.001). Core length analysis yielded 13 mm cores have an optimal sensitivity (42.8%) and specificity (76.5%) for detection of carcinoma (odds ratio: 2.43). Secondary analyses of Gleason score did not show any difference with respect to core length. CONCLUSION This study suggests that core length is a biopsy parameter that affects detection of cancer and is an essential parameter for core biopsy quality.

[1]  M. Remzi,et al.  The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[2]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Prostate needle biopsy quality in reduction by dutasteride of prostate cancer events study: worldwide comparison of improvement with investigator training and centralized laboratory processing. , 2010, Urology.

[3]  J. Epstein,et al.  Fragmentation of prostatic needle biopsy cores containing adenocarcinoma: the role of specimen submission , 2010, BJU international.

[4]  M. Pea,et al.  Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. , 2006, European urology.

[5]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies , 2003, Journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Handling and pathology reporting of prostate biopsies. , 2004, European urology.

[7]  C. Öbek,et al.  Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[8]  G. Hutarew,et al.  Prostate Biopsy Outcome Using 29 mm Cutting Length , 2005, Urologia Internationalis.

[9]  Nicolas Barry Delongchamps,et al.  Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Ö. Akdemir,et al.  Sixteen gauge needles improve specimen quality but not cancer detection rate in transrectal ultrasound-guided 10-core prostate biopsies , 2008, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[11]  M. Rubin,et al.  Prostate Needle Biopsy Reporting: How Are the Surgical Members of the Society of Urologic Oncology Using Pathology Reports to Guide Treatment of Prostate Cancer Patients? , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[12]  Rodolfo Montironi,et al.  Contemporary Role of Systematic Prostate Biopsies: Indications, Techniques, and Implications for Patient Care , 2013 .

[13]  Rodolfo Montironi,et al.  Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. , 2007, European urology.

[14]  Galin L. Jones,et al.  Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate. , 2002, Urology.

[15]  M. Rubin,et al.  What information are urologists extracting from prostate needle biopsy reports and what do they need for clinical management of prostate cancer? , 2005, European urology.

[16]  Susanne Hempel,et al.  Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[17]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.