A performance comparison between the Earth Simulator and other terascale systems on a characteristic ASCI workload

This work gives a detailed analysis of the relative performance of the recently installed Earth Simulator and the next top four systems in the Top500 list using predictive performance models. The Earth Simulator uses vector processing nodes interconnected using a single‐stage, cross‐bar network, whereas the next top four systems are built using commodity based superscalar microprocessors and interconnection networks. The performance that can be achieved results from an interplay of system characteristics, application requirements and scalability behavior. Detailed performance models are used here to predict the performance of two codes representative of the ASCI workload, namely SAGE and Sweep3D. The performance models encapsulate fully the behavior of these codes and have been previously validated on many large‐scale systems. One result of this analysis is to size systems, built from the same nodes and networks as those in the top five, that will have the same performance as the Earth Simulator. In particular, the largest ASCI machine, ASCI Q, is expected to achieve a similar performance to the Earth Simulator on the representative workload. Published in 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Fabrizio Petrini,et al.  A general predictive performance model for wavefront algorithms on clusters of SMPs , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Parallel Processing.

[2]  Hiroshi Takahara,et al.  A 26.58 Tflops Global Atmospheric Simulation with the Spectral Transform Method on the Earth Simulator , 2002, ACM/IEEE SC 2002 Conference (SC'02).

[3]  Alexander V. Veidenbaum,et al.  Innovative Architecture for Future Generation High-Performance Processors and Systems , 2003, Innovative Architecture for Future Generation High-Performance Processors and Systems, 2003.

[4]  Adolfy Hoisie,et al.  A comparison between the Earth Simulator and AlphaServer systems using predictive application performance models , 2003, Proceedings International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium.

[5]  Wu-chun Feng,et al.  The Quadrics Network: High-Performance Clustering Technology , 2002, IEEE Micro.

[6]  Mitsuo Yokokawa,et al.  16.4-Tflops Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulence by a Fourier Spectral Method on the Earth Simulator , 2002, ACM/IEEE SC 2002 Conference (SC'02).

[7]  Adolfy Hoisie,et al.  Exploring advanced architectures using performance prediction , 2002, International Workshop on Innovative Architecture for Future Generation High-Performance Processors and Systems.

[8]  F. Petrini,et al.  The Case of the Missing Supercomputer Performance: Achieving Optimal Performance on the 8,192 Processors of ASCI Q , 2003, ACM/IEEE SC 2003 Conference (SC'03).

[9]  Shawn D. Pautz,et al.  Performance modeling of deterministic transport computations , 2004 .

[10]  Mark M. Mathis,et al.  A performance model of non-deterministic particle transport on large-scale systems , 2003, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[11]  Mitsuo Yokokawa,et al.  An MPI Benchmark Program Library and Its Application to the Earth Simulator , 2002, ISHPC.

[12]  M. Yokokawa.  Present status of development of the Earth Simulator , 2001, 2001 Innovative Architecture for Future Generation High-Performance Processors and Systems.

[13]  Vladimir Getov,et al.  Performance Analysis and Grid Computing , 2004, Springer US.

[14]  Tetsuya Sato.  Can the earth simulator change the way humans think? , 2002, ICS '02.

[15]  Adolfy Hoisie,et al.  Performance Optimization of Numerically Intensive Codes , 1987 .

[16]  Adolfy Hoisie,et al.  Performance and Scalability Analysis of Teraflop-Scale Parallel Architectures Using Multidimensional Wavefront Applications , 2000, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[17]  Fabrizio Petrini,et al.  Predictive Performance and Scalability Modeling of a Large-Scale Application , 2001, ACM/IEEE SC 2001 Conference (SC'01).