Cost-benefit analysis of renewable energy systems under uncertainties

Despite the continuously increasing tension in the field of energy supply, suspicion still remains as regards the renewable energy sources (RES) applications, especially on the level of the actual installation cost and its comparison to the expected benefits. Within this framework, the well-known Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) technique is widely used. The problem with the usual, conventional way for the implementation of CBA lies in the fact that the values of the cost - benefit parameters are not known precisely, thus undermining the reliability of the results. More specifically, in the case of RES investments, these uncertainties are related either to the monetary values themselves (e.g. buying cost, rate of interest, maintenance cost, future cost of energy, etc.), or to parameters which affect the monetary quantities (e.g. anticipated life time of the product, malfunctions frequency, expected saving of conventional energy, variability of meteorological conditions, uncertainties related to the performance testing results of the systems etc). In the proposed work, a modified version of the CBA based on the Monte-Carlo simulation is discussed. The examined approach is compatible with the current perceptions regarding the treatment of information under uncertainty conditions, through the use of conventional metrological tools.

[1]  Jay Zarnikau,et al.  A review of efforts to restructure Texas' electricity market , 2005 .

[2]  G. Wübbeler,et al.  Evaluation of measurement uncertainty and its numerical calculation by a Monte Carlo method , 2008 .

[3]  Vassilis Belessiotis,et al.  Uncertainty in estimating the performance of solar thermal systems , 2012 .

[4]  Maurice G. Cox,et al.  The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty , 2006 .

[5]  Alistair B. Forbes,et al.  Advanced mathematical & computational tools in metrology & testing , 2006 .

[6]  B. Ogayar,et al.  Cost determination of the electro-mechanical equipment of a small hydro-power plant , 2009 .

[7]  R. Mccarthy,et al.  A feast for the mind , 2002, Nature.

[8]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[9]  Volker Horstmann,et al.  Decentralized desalination of brackish water by a directly coupled reverse-osmosis-photovoltaic-system - a pilot plant study in Jordan , 1998 .

[10]  R. Brent Applied Cost-benefit Analysis , 1996 .

[11]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Discounting: An eye on the future , 2002, Nature.

[12]  Chigueru Tiba,et al.  Analytic solutions for the geometric and optical properties of stationary compound parabolic concentrators with fully illuminated inverted V receiver , 2008 .

[13]  Omar H. Al-Sakaf Application possibilities of solar thermal power plants in Arab countries , 1998 .

[14]  Arthouros Zervos,et al.  Cost benefit analysis for solar water heating systems , 2001 .