Timescale analysis of rule‐based biochemical reaction networks

The flow of information within a cell is governed by a series of protein–protein interactions that can be described as a reaction network. Mathematical models of biochemical reaction networks can be constructed by repetitively applying specific rules that define how reactants interact and what new species are formed on reaction. To aid in understanding the underlying biochemistry, timescale analysis is one method developed to prune the size of the reaction network. In this work, we extend the methods associated with timescale analysis to reaction rules instead of the species contained within the network. To illustrate this approach, we applied timescale analysis to a simple receptor–ligand binding model and a rule‐based model of interleukin‐12 (IL‐12) signaling in naïve CD4+ T cells. The IL‐12 signaling pathway includes multiple protein–protein interactions that collectively transmit information; however, the level of mechanistic detail sufficient to capture the observed dynamics has not been justified based on the available data. The analysis correctly predicted that reactions associated with Janus Kinase 2 and Tyrosine Kinase 2 binding to their corresponding receptor exist at a pseudo‐equilibrium. By contrast, reactions associated with ligand binding and receptor turnover regulate cellular response to IL‐12. An empirical Bayesian approach was used to estimate the uncertainty in the timescales. This approach complements existing rank‐ and flux‐based methods that can be used to interrogate complex reaction networks. Ultimately, timescale analysis of rule‐based models is a computational tool that can be used to reveal the biochemical steps that regulate signaling dynamics. © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2012

[1]  W. Forst Kinetics and Mechanism. A Study of Homogeneous Chemical Reactions. , 1961 .

[2]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Analysis of intracellular receptor/ligand sorting. Calculation of mean surface and bulk diffusion times within a sphere. , 1986, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Matthew Neurock,et al.  Monte carlo simulation of complex reaction systems: molecular structure and reactivity in modelling heavy oils , 1990 .

[4]  F. Podlaski,et al.  IL-12 receptor. I. Characterization of the receptor on phytohemagglutinin-activated human lymphoblasts. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[5]  Ulrich Maas,et al.  Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space , 1992 .

[6]  L. Broadbelt,et al.  Mechanistic Modelling of Polymer Pyrolysis Using Monte Carlo Methods , 1993 .

[7]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Receptors: Models for Binding, Trafficking, and Signaling , 1993 .

[8]  S. Lam,et al.  The CSP method for simplifying kinetics , 1994 .

[9]  Linda J. Broadbelt,et al.  Computer Generated Pyrolysis Modeling: On-the-Fly Generation of Species, Reactions, and Rates , 1994 .

[10]  J. Liao,et al.  Control of metabolic pathways by time-scale separation. , 1995, Bio Systems.

[11]  Linda J. Broadbelt,et al.  Termination of Computer-Generated Reaction Mechanisms: Species Rank-Based Convergence Criterion , 1995 .

[12]  Linda J. Broadbelt,et al.  Computer generated reaction modelling: Decomposition and encoding algorithms for determining species uniqueness , 1996 .

[13]  Linda J. Broadbelt,et al.  Mechanism reduction during computer generation of compact reaction models , 1997 .

[14]  U. Gubler,et al.  Differential Associations between the Cytoplasmic Regions of the Interleukin-12 Receptor Subunits β1 and β2 and JAK Kinases* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Michael L. Mavrovouniotis,et al.  Model Reduction in the Computational Modeling of Reaction Systems , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[16]  U. Gubler,et al.  Differential associations between the cytoplasmic regions of the interleukin-12 receptor subunits beta1 and beta2 and JAK kinases. , 1997, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  William H. Green,et al.  Rate-Based Construction of Kinetic Models for Complex Systems , 1997 .

[18]  Michael L. Mavrovouniotis,et al.  SIMPLIFICATION OF CHEMICAL REACTION SYSTEMS BY TIME-SCALE ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[19]  Linda J. Broadbelt,et al.  Construction of a mechanistic model of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis on Ni(1 1 1) and Co(0 0 0 1) surfaces , 1999 .

[20]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Quantification of Short Term Signaling by the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  S. Wanant,et al.  Insulin receptor binding kinetics: modeling and simulation studies. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  A. Sherman,et al.  A mathematical model of metabolic insulin signaling pathways. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[24]  François Fages,et al.  Modelling and querying interaction networks in the biochemical abstract machine BIOCHAM , 2002 .

[25]  James R Faeder,et al.  The complexity of complexes in signal transduction , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  T. Pawson,et al.  Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains , 2003, Science.

[27]  D. Fremont,et al.  N-domain–dependent nonphosphorylated STAT4 dimers required for cytokine-driven activation , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[28]  H. Haken Synergetics: Introduction and Advanced Topics , 2004 .

[29]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  BioNetGen: software for rule-based modeling of signal transduction based on the interactions of molecular domains , 2004, Bioinform..

[30]  U. Bhalla Models of cell signaling pathways. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[31]  Roger Brent,et al.  Automatic generation of cellular reaction networks with Moleculizer 1.0 , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  K. Sachs,et al.  Causal Protein-Signaling Networks Derived from Multiparameter Single-Cell Data , 2005, Science.

[33]  Chunhui Li,et al.  Exploring the diversity of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Bioinform..

[34]  Jim Pfaendtner,et al.  Lexicography of kinetic modeling of complex reaction networks , 2005 .

[35]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  A domain-oriented approach to the reduction of combinatorial complexity in signal transduction networks , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[36]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Reconstruction of cellular signalling networks and analysis of their properties , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[37]  D. Klinke The ratio of P40 monomer to dimer is an important determinant of IL-12 bioactivity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  Thomas A. Henzinger,et al.  Qualitative networks: a symbolic approach to analyze biological signaling networks , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[39]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  A network model of early events in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling that accounts for combinatorial complexity. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[40]  Leif H. Finkel,et al.  BIOENGINEERING MODELS OF CELL SIGNALING , 2007 .

[41]  Tian Jin,et al.  Key Role of Local Regulation in Chemosensing Revealed by a New Molecular Interaction-Based Modeling Method , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  Michael Ederer,et al.  Reduced modeling of signal transduction – a modular approach , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[43]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Ligand-dependent responses of the ErbB signaling network: experimental and modeling analyses , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[44]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  Top-Down Analysis of Temporal Hierarchy in Biochemical Reaction Networks , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[45]  Luay Nakhleh,et al.  The Signaling Petri Net-Based Simulator: A Non-Parametric Strategy for Characterizing the Dynamics of Cell-Specific Signaling Networks , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  James R Faeder,et al.  Kinetic Monte Carlo method for rule-based modeling of biochemical networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  Michael B. Yaffe,et al.  Signaling Networks and Mathematics , 2008, Science Signaling.

[48]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Domain-oriented reduction of rule-based network models. , 2008, IET systems biology.

[49]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Internal coarse-graining of molecular systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  James R Faeder,et al.  Rule-based modeling of biochemical systems with BioNetGen. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[51]  Vassily Hatzimanikatis,et al.  Computational framework for predictive biodegradation , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[52]  David J. Klinke,et al.  An empirical Bayesian approach for model-based inference of cellular signaling networks , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[53]  William W. Chen,et al.  Classic and contemporary approaches to modeling biochemical reactions. , 2010, Genes & development.

[54]  Rob Phillips,et al.  SnapShot: Key Numbers in Biology , 2010, Cell.

[55]  David J Klinke,et al.  A multiscale systems perspective on cancer, immunotherapy, and Interleukin-12 , 2010, Molecular Cancer.

[56]  Dan V. Nicolau,et al.  Conformational Spread as a Mechanism for Cooperativity in the Bacterial Flagellar Switch , 2010, Science.

[57]  D. Klinke Signal transduction networks in cancer: quantitative parameters influence network topology. , 2010, Cancer research.

[59]  T. Schlick,et al.  Biomolecular modeling and simulation: a field coming of age , 2011, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[60]  Stacey D. Finley,et al.  Inferring relevant control mechanisms for interleukin‐12 signaling in naïve CD4+ T cells , 2011, Immunology and cell biology.