Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: New randomized, controlled trials have become available on oral P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome. We aimed to evaluate current evidence comparing the efficacy and safety profile of prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods: We performed a network meta-analysis and direct pairwise comparison analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes from 12 randomized controlled trials including a total of 52 816 patients with acute coronary syndrome. Results: In comparison with clopidogrel, ticagrelor significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72–0.92]) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75–0.92]), whereas there was no statistically significant mortality reduction with prasugrel (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.80–1.01] and HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84–1.02], respectively). In comparison with each other, there were no significant differences in mortality (HR prasugrel versus ticagrelor, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.94–1.29] and 1.12 [95% CI, 0.98–1.28]). In comparison with clopidogrel, prasugrel reduced myocardial infarction (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67–0.98]), whereas ticagrelor showed no risk reduction (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.78–1.22]). Differences between prasugrel and ticagrelor were not statistically significant. Stent thrombosis risk was significantly reduced by both ticagrelor and prasugrel versus clopidogrel (28%–50% range of reduction). In comparison with clopidogrel, both prasugrel (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.01–1.56]) and ticagrelor (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.04–1.55]) significantly increased major bleeding. There were no significant differences between prasugrel and ticagrelor for all outcomes explored. Conclusions: Prasugrel and ticagrelor reduced ischemic events and increased bleeding in comparison with clopidogrel. A significant mortality reduction was observed with ticagrelor only. There was no efficacy and safety difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42019155648.

[1]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Response by Park and Park to Letter Regarding Article, "Clinically Significant Bleeding With Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Korean Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial". , 2020, Circulation.

[2]  J. Chae,et al.  Clinically Significant Bleeding With Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Korean Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2019, Circulation.

[3]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[4]  W. Rottbauer,et al.  Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  S. de Servi,et al.  Comparison of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel and Standard-Dose Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Percutaneous Revascularization , 2018, Circulation.

[6]  P. Gurbel,et al.  Combination oral antithrombotic therapy for the treatment of myocardial infarction: recent developments , 2018, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[7]  J. Mrózek,et al.  1-Year Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[9]  P. Liu,et al.  Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel Treatment in Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[10]  Xin Wang,et al.  Efficacy and safety outcomes of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in elderly Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome , 2016, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[11]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2011, European heart journal.

[12]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese patients with acute coronary syndrome -- randomized, double-blind, phase III PHILO study. , 2015, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[13]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  A. Go,et al.  Association of spontaneous bleeding and myocardial infarction with long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2015 .

[16]  A. Jaffe,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[17]  C. Held,et al.  Ticagrelor effects on myocardial infarction and the impact of event adjudication in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  S. Saito,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Adjusted-Dose Prasugrel Compared With Clopidogrel in Japanese Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome , 2014 .

[19]  S. Saito,et al.  Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PRASFIT-ACS study. , 2014, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[20]  N. Deshpande,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization , 2013 .

[21]  S. de Servi,et al.  A critical overview on ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes. , 2013, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[22]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Higgins Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[24]  C. Cannon,et al.  Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  M. Keltai,et al.  Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study , 2010, The Lancet.

[26]  Claes Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  A. Skene,et al.  Comparison of ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. , 2009, American heart journal.

[28]  E. Antman,et al.  Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) analysis. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.