δ25 Crack opening displacement parameter in cohesive zone models: experiments and simulations in asphalt concrete

Recent work with fracture characterization of asphalt concrete has shown that a cohesive zone model (CZM) provides insight into the fracture process of the materials. However, a current approach to estimate fracture energy, i.e., in terms of area of force versus crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD), for asphalt concrete overpredicts its magnitude. Therefore, the δ 25 parameter, which was inspired by the δ 5 concept of Schwalbe and co-workers, is proposed as an operational definition of a crack tip opening displacement (CTOD). The δ 25 measurement is incorporated into an experimental study of validation of its usefulness with asphalt concrete, and is utilized to estimate fracture energy. The work presented herein validates the δ 25 parameter for asphalt concrete, describes the experimental techniques for utilizing the δ 25 parameter, and presents three-dimensional (3D) CZM simulations with a specially tailored cohesive relation. The integration of the δ 25 parameter and new cohesive model has provided further insight into the fracture process of asphalt concrete with relatively good agreement between experimental results and numerical simulations.

[1]  H. Espinosa,et al.  A grain level model for the study of failure initiation and evolution in polycrystalline brittle materials. Part I: Theory and numerical implementation , 2003 .

[2]  William G. Buttlar,et al.  Influence of Specimen Size on Fracture Energy of Asphalt Concrete (With Discussion) , 2007 .

[3]  Eyad Masad,et al.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE REPRESENTATIVE VOLUME ELEMENT AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF ASPHALT CONCRETE , 2001 .

[4]  James C. Newman,et al.  Fracture mechanics testing on specimens with low constraint––standardisation activities within ISO and ASTM , 2005 .

[5]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Fracture Mechanics of Concrete: Applications of Fracture Mechanics to Concrete, Rock and Other Quasi-Brittle Materials , 1995 .

[6]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  A bilinear cohesive zone model tailored for fracture of asphalt concrete considering viscoelastic bulk material , 2006 .

[7]  Mihai O. Marasteanu,et al.  Evaluation of the low temperature fracture resistance of asphalt mixtures using the semi circular bend test , 2004 .

[8]  G. H. Paulino,et al.  Disk-shaped compact tension test for asphalt concrete fracture , 2005 .

[9]  Karl-Heinz Schwalbe,et al.  Introduction of δ 5 as an Operational Definition of the CTOD and Its Practical Use , 1995 .

[10]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials , 1997 .

[11]  Seong Hyeok Song,et al.  Fracture of Asphalt Concrete: A Cohesive Zone Modeling Approach Considering Viscoelastic Effects , 2006 .

[12]  Chris Olidis,et al.  Guide for the mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures: materials characterization: is your agency ready? , 2004 .

[13]  Robert A. Ainsworth,et al.  Recommendations for a modification of ASTM E 1457 to include creep-brittle materials , 1999 .

[14]  Jorge Barbosa Soares,et al.  CRACK MODELING OF ASPHALTIC MIXTURES CONSIDERING HETEROGENEITY OF THE MATERIAL , 2003 .