A validation study of the Dementia Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE To determine the validity of the Dementia Questionnaire (a semistructured informant interview) for the diagnosis of dementia. DESIGN Comparison of dementia status determined by a telephone-administered informant questionnaire with the criterion standard of clinical diagnosis established by examination and laboratory studies. SETTING Gerontology Research Center, the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. SUBJECTS Volunteer cohort of 42 men and 32 women aged 68 to 97 years. Subjects were selected from strata defined by Blessed Information Memory Concentration Test scores, with oversampling of borderline scores (3 to 10). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity and specificity of the Dementia Questionnaire in comparison with the criterion standard of clinical diagnosis. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE Interrater reliability (kappa coefficient). RESULTS Sensitivity and specificity for dementia were 100% and 90%, respectively. Most false-positive findings were from subjects with cognitive impairment that did not meet criteria for dementia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition. Interrater reliability was high (kappa = 0.83). CONCLUSION The Dementia Questionnaire can be used effectively in research studies to screen for dementia.

[1]  J. Price,et al.  Retrospective postmortem dementia assessment. Validation of a new clinical interview to assist neuropathologic study. , 1991, Archives of neurology.

[2]  Anthony F Jorm,et al.  The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms , 1989, Psychological Medicine.

[3]  W. Kukull,et al.  Distinguishing Alzheimer's Disease from Other Dementias , 1989, Journal of The American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  K. Davis,et al.  A Study of the Reliability of the Family History Method in Genetic Sudies of Alzheimer Disease , 1989, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[5]  H. Buschke,et al.  Genuine memory deficits in dementia , 1987 .

[6]  Jeremy M. Silverman,et al.  Reliability of the family history method in genetic studies of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. , 1986, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  David Arenberg,et al.  Normal Human Aging: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging , 1984 .

[8]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[9]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Boston naming test , 2001 .

[10]  T. Kurosaki,et al.  Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[11]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[12]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[13]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[14]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[15]  M. Roth,et al.  The Association Between Quantitative Measures of Dementia and of Senile Change in the Cerebral Grey Matter of Elderly Subjects , 1968, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[16]  A. Davies,et al.  The influence of age on trail making test performance. , 1968, Journal of clinical psychology.