Managing Projects in an Embedded System Development Context: An In-Depth Case Study from an Improvisational Perspective

This paper reports the findings of an empirical investigation into developing and managing an embedded system project in the context of structured process management. This research adopts an interpretive case study approach and explores project managers' and developers' experiences in embedded system development within a turbulent environment. The study describes the complex undertaking of managing embedded system development, which, in this case, involved improvisational and bricolage practices. It analyses the various influences on the management of an embedded system development project in this setting, along with the organizational responses to such influences. The paper indicates that improvisation and bricolage might be possible tactics for coping with challenges, and lead to a smooth transition of organizational processes. In this case setting, best practices and principles became informal rules and standards, both of which enabled the project manager to cope with difficulties throughout the project.

[1]  M. Cunha Bricolage in Organizations , 2005 .

[2]  D. Bryde Project management concepts, methods and application , 2003 .

[3]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process , 2003 .

[4]  David E. Avison,et al.  The fiction of methodological development: a field study of information systems development , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[5]  Robert K. Wysocki,et al.  Effective Project Management: Traditional, Adaptive, Extreme , 2000 .

[6]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  New product development team improvisation and speed‐to‐market: an extended model , 2002 .

[7]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[8]  David E. Avison,et al.  The discipline of information systems: Let many flowers bloom! , 1995, ISCO.

[9]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[10]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  The labyrinths of Information , 2002 .

[11]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TENSIONS: EXPLORING CONTRASTING STYLES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[12]  K. Weick Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[13]  Hans Toetenel,et al.  Embedded Software Engineering: The State of the Practice , 2003, IEEE Softw..

[14]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[15]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[16]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Crisis and foundations: an inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the information systems discipline , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Stephen A. Leybourne,et al.  The role of intuition and improvisation in project management , 2006 .

[18]  J. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage , 2007 .

[19]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[20]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[21]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[22]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Software process models , 1996, CSUR.

[23]  Tammy Noergaard,et al.  Embedded Software , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[24]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[25]  C. Lévi-Strauss,et al.  The Savage Mind. , 1967 .

[26]  Mie Augier,et al.  Networks, cognition and management of tacit knowledge , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[27]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[28]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  A spiral model of software development and enhancement , 1986, Computer.