The effect of different compression pressure in therapy of secondary upper extremity lymphedema in women after breast cancer surgery.

This study evaluated how different levels of pressure under inelastic multi-layer bandages affect the reduction of secondary arm lymphedema and patient comfort throughout therapy. Ninety-six women with lymphedema after breast cancer treatment were randomized into three groups of 32 patients depending on level of applied pressure in compression therapy: group I (control) at 21-30 mmHg; study groups II A at 31-40 mmHg and group II B at 41-60 mmHg. All patients were treated with complex decongestive therapy (CDT) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) before compression. Fixed points of bilateral arms were measured at the start (first visit), after 24 h, 7 days, and 14 days of therapy. Edema severity was measured by summary calculation. Results were presented as a relative metric coefficient of arm lymphedema (RMCAL) which is the difference between sums of circumferences of the edematous arm and the contralateral side expressed in percents. In order to evaluate the patient comfort after finishing a two-week therapy all patients assessed the level of accompanying pain using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS). At the start of therapy median arm circumference difference (RMCAL) was 18.60%, 18.51%, and 19.05% in groups I-II B, respectively. After 24 h the median RMCAL was reduced to 14.49%, 12.13%, and 12.64%. This was further reduced to 10.77%, 6.98%, and 8.48% at one week and 10.28%, 5.75%, and 7.20% in each group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between RMCAL values in group II A and II B throughout the therapy. In group II A (NRS = 2), applied bandages were better tolerated than in both II B (NRS = 5) and control groups (NRS = 8). These results demonstrate that inelastic multi-layer bandages applied in groups II A and II B (41-60 mmHg) led to the same reduction of swollen arm circumference with group II being better tolerated. The lowest compression (control at 21-30 mmHg) produced the smallest reduction. In addition, since the greatest reduction was seen in the first week of therapy while the second week served to maintain the reduction, compression garments may be able to be ordered after one week of therapy for more efficient patient care.

[1]  R. Baumeister Management des Lymphödems , 2017, DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.

[2]  M. Clark,et al.  Dogmas and controversies in compression therapy: report of an International Compression Club (ICC) meeting, Brussels, May 2011 , 2013, International wound journal.

[3]  P. Mortimer Arm lymphoedema after breast cancer. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  B. Newman,et al.  Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  W. Olszewski Lymphovenous microsurgical shunts in treatment of lymphedema of lower limbs: a 45-year experience of one surgeon/one center. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[6]  F. Vicini,et al.  Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema: A Review of Recent Developments , 2013 .

[7]  A. Szuba,et al.  Efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage in preventing secondary lymphedema after breast cancer surgery. , 2012, Lymphology.

[8]  Y. Bakar,et al.  Complex Decongestive Physiotherapy Treats Skin Changes like Hyperkeratosis Caused by Lymphedema , 2012, Case reports in dermatological medicine.

[9]  E. Hansson,et al.  Development of a pressure-measuring device to optimize compression treatment of lymphedema and evaluation of change in garment pressure with simulated wear and tear. , 2012, Lymphatic research and biology.

[10]  Meryl Cohen Complete Decongestive Physical Therapy in a Patient With Secondary Lymphedema Due to Orthopedic Trauma and Surgery of the Lower Extremity , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[11]  L. Vaillant,et al.  Changes in the nail unit in patients with secondary lymphoedema identified using clinical, dermoscopic and ultrasound examination , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[12]  J. Mackey,et al.  Conservative and dietary interventions for cancer‐related lymphedema , 2011, Cancer.

[13]  Takuhiro Yamaguchi,et al.  A practice guideline for the management of lymphoedema , 2011 .

[14]  M. Martín,et al.  Manual lymphatic drainage therapy in patients with breast cancer related lymphoedema , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[15]  J. Aitken,et al.  Does quality of life among breast cancer survivors one year after diagnosis differ depending on urban and non-urban residence? A comparative study , 2010, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[16]  R. Hansdorfer-Korzon,et al.  Skin changes in patients after mastectomy due to breast cancer , 2010 .

[17]  H. Schumann,et al.  Bandage pressure measurement and training: simple interventions to improve efficacy in compression bandaging , 2009, International wound journal.

[18]  H. Partsch,et al.  Compression therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized, controlled comparative study of relation between volume and interface pressure changes. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  P. Mortimer,et al.  Recent advances in breast cancer-related lymphedema of the arm: lymphatic pump failure and predisposing factors. , 2009, Lymphatic research and biology.

[20]  H. Partsch,et al.  Controlled, Comparative Study of Relation between Volume Changes and Interface Pressure under Short‐Stretch Bandages in Leg Lymphedema Patients , 2008, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[21]  Jan Schuren,et al.  The efficacy of Laplace's equation in calculating bandage pressure in , 2008 .

[22]  H. Partsch Assessing the effectiveness of multilayer inelastic bandaging , 2007 .

[23]  Karen Holtgrefe Twice-weekly complete decongestive physical therapy in the management of secondary lymphedema of the lower extremities. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[24]  S. Vignes,et al.  Recurrence of lymphoedema‐associated cellulitis (erysipelas) under prophylactic antibiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study , 2006, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[25]  Grażyna Cepuch,et al.  Selected scales for pain intensity examination in adolescents - assessment of their usefulness , 2006 .

[26]  Steve Thomas,et al.  Laboratory-based evaluation of a compression-bandaging system. , 2003, Nursing times.

[27]  A. Williams,et al.  'Putting the pressure on': a study of compression sleeves used in breast cancer-related lymphoedema. , 1999, Journal of tissue viability.

[28]  Lymphedema 101 Part 1 : Understanding the pathology and diagnosis , 2022 .