Calibration and validation of the ActiGraph GT3X+ in 2-3 year olds.

OBJECTIVES To calibrate and validate the ActiGraph GT3X+ to measure sedentary behaviour and physical activity in 2-3 year olds, using 5-s epochs; and to compare the predictive validity of the resulting cut-points with that of NHANES', Trost's, and Pate's 15-s cut-points. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. METHODS Eighteen children (2.86 ± 0.60 years) wore an ActiGraph GT3X+ during video-recorded semi-structured calibration activity sessions. Activity was coded following Children's Activity Rating Scale. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was used to derive Axis1 and vector magnitude cut-points for sedentary behaviour and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at 5-s epochs. Agreement with Children's Activity Rating Scale was assessed with Cohen's kappa, Lin's concordance, and Bland-Altman plots. Predictive validity of all cut-points was assessed in an independent sample of 20 children (2.99 ± 0.48 years) video-recorded during free-play, using the same procedures as the calibration phase. RESULTS During calibration, vector magnitude cut-points (sedentary behaviour ≤ 96.12 counts; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity ≥ 361.94 counts) showed slightly better classification agreement with Children's Activity Rating Scale than Axis1 cut-points (sedentary behaviour ≤ 5 counts; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity ≥ 165 counts), but the latter showed the lowest bias in estimated sedentary behaviour and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity time. In the validation sample, 5-s Axis1 cut-points showed the best predictive validity and lowest mean differences of all cut-points between predicted and observed sedentary behaviour (-2.31%), light physical activity (-24.40%), and total physical activity time (-0.95%). Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity time was significantly overestimated by all cut-points (128.33-184.17%). CONCLUSIONS Because moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was highly overestimated, using only the 5-s Axis1 sedentary behaviour cut-point to distinguish sedentary behaviour from total physical activity is advised. The high accuracy indicates that these cut-points are useful for epidemiological studies involving the sedentary behaviour and physical activity of 2-3 year olds.

[1]  J. Spence,et al.  Canadian Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for the Early Years (aged 0-4 years). , 2012, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[2]  Michael W. Beets,et al.  Accelerometer-derived physical activity levels of preschoolers: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[3]  Soyang Kwon,et al.  Tracking of accelerometry-measured physical activity during childhood: ICAD pooled analysis , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[4]  Greet Cardon,et al.  Feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements to assess physical activity in toddlers , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[5]  N. Cox,et al.  A Note on the Concordance Correlation Coefficient , 2002 .

[6]  G. Schofield,et al.  Accelerometry to Assess Preschooler's Free-Play: Issues with Count Thresholds and Epoch Durations , 2009 .

[7]  N. Owen,et al.  Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Kong Y Chen,et al.  An artificial neural network model of energy expenditure using nonintegrated acceleration signals. , 2007, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  D. Borzekowski,et al.  Children's Television Exposure and Behavioral and Social Outcomes at 5.5 Years: Does Timing of Exposure Matter? , 2007, Pediatrics.

[10]  S. Clemes,et al.  Qualitative Feasibility of Using Three Accelerometers With 2–3-Year-Old Children and Both Parents , 2013, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[11]  John J Reilly,et al.  Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines for the Early Years (aged 0-4 years). , 2012, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[12]  T. Baranowski,et al.  Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS): description and calibration. , 1990, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[13]  Risto Telama,et al.  Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a 21-year tracking study. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  J. Spence,et al.  Systematic review of physical activity and health in the early years (aged 0-4 years). , 2012, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values , 1994, BMJ.

[16]  J. Spence,et al.  Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in the early years (aged 0-4 years). , 2012, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[17]  Russell R. Pate,et al.  Validation and Calibration of an Accelerometer in Preschool Children , 2006, Obesity.

[18]  Natalie Pearson,et al.  Tracking of sedentary behaviours of young people: a systematic review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[19]  T. Cole,et al.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Chief Medical Officer.,et al.  Start active, stay active: a report on physical activity from the four home countries' Chief Medical Officers , 2013 .

[21]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[22]  T. Burns,et al.  Tracking of activity and sedentary behaviors in childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[23]  Sherry J. Haar,et al.  Identification and Validity of Accelerometer Cut‐Points for Toddlers , 2012, Obesity.

[24]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[25]  T. Cole,et al.  children and adolescents: international survey Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in , 2007 .

[26]  R. Pate,et al.  Measurement of physical activity in preschool children. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  Robert M. Malina,et al.  Adherence to Physical Activity From Childhood to Adulthood: A Perspective From Tracking Studies , 2001 .

[28]  Greet Cardon,et al.  Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children. , 2011, International journal of pediatric obesity : IJPO : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[29]  M. Keen Early Development and Attainment of Normal Mature Gait , 1993 .

[30]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[31]  G. Cardon,et al.  What do we know about physical activity in infants and toddlers: A review of the literature and future research directions , 2011 .

[32]  A. Okely,et al.  Methodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess habitual physical activity in children aged 0-5 years. , 2009, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[33]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[34]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .