PEAK SHIFT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AS A MECHANISM OF SIGNAL EVOLUTION

Abstract “Peak shift” is a behavioral response bias arising from discrimination learning in which animals display a directional, but limited, preference for or avoidance of unusual stimuli. Its hypothesized evolutionary relevance has been primarily in the realm of aposematic coloration and limited sexual dimorphism. Here, we develop a novel functional approach to peak shift, based on signal detection theory, which characterizes the response bias as arising from uncertainty about stimulus appearance, frequency, and quality. This approach allows the influence of peak shift to be generalized to the evolution of signals in a variety of domains and sensory modalities. The approach is illustrated with a bumblebee (Bombus impatiens) discrimination learning experiment. Bees exhibited peak shift while foraging in an artificial Batesian mimicry system. Changes in flower abundance, color distribution, and visitation reward induced bees to preferentially visit novel flower colors that reduced the risk of flower‐type misidentification. Under conditions of signal uncertainty, peak shift results in visitation to rarer, but more easily distinguished, morphological variants of rewarding species in preference to their average morphology. Peak shift is a common and taxonomically widespread phenomenon. This example of the possible role of peak shift in signal evolution can be generalized to other systems in which a signal receiver learns to make choices in situations in which signal variation is linked to the sender's reproductive success.

[1]  H. M. Hanson.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  D S Blough,et al.  Stimulus Generalization as Signal Detection in Pigeons , 1967, Science.

[3]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[4]  Gabriella Gamberale,et al.  Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  S. Lynn.  Learning to avoid aposematic prey , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  R. Menzel,et al.  Opponent colour coding is a universal strategy to evaluate the photoreceptor inputs in Hymenoptera , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  A. Gumbert.  Color choices by bumble bees (Bombus terrestris): innate preferences and generalization after learning , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Generalisation: mechanistic and functional explanations , 2002, Animal Cognition.

[10]  J. Stevens.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[11]  Werner Backhaus,et al.  Color opponent coding in the visual system of the honeybee , 1991, Vision Research.

[12]  K. Daly,et al.  The generalization of an olfactory-based conditioned response reveals unique but overlapping odour representations in the moth Manduca sexta. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  M. Ryan.  Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. , 1998, Science.

[14]  S. Ghirlanda,et al.  A century of generalization , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  A. Gumbert,et al.  Colour similarity to rewarding model plants affects pollination in a food deceptive orchid, Orchis boryi , 2001 .

[16]  T. Getty.  Discriminability and the Sigmoid Functional Response: How Optimal Foragers Could Stabilize Model-Mimic Complexes , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[17]  P. O'donald.  Genetic Models of Sexual Selection , 1980 .

[18]  M. Domjan.  The principles of learning and behavior, 4th ed. , 1998 .

[19]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[20]  M. Domjan.  The principles of learning and behavior , 1982 .

[21]  O. Leimar,et al.  Synergistic selection and graded traits , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[22]  M. Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Cognitive ecology: the evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making. , 1998, Trends in cognitive sciences.

[23]  D. Weary,et al.  A PRODUCT OF DISCRIMINATIVE LEARNING MAY LEAD TO FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR ELABORATE MALES , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolutionary Stability of Aposematic Coloration and Prey Unprofitability: A Theoretical Analysis , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[25]  D S Blough,et al.  Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[26]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[27]  M. Higashi,et al.  The evolution of warning signals , 1998, Nature.

[28]  J. Mappes,et al.  Can aposematic signals evolve by gradual change? , 1999, Nature.

[29]  C A Boneau,et al.  Decision theory, the pigeon, and the psychophysical function. , 1967, Psychological review.

[30]  R. B. Purtle.  Peak shift: A review. , 1973 .