The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction

This article draws on work at the interface of grammar and interaction to argue that the clause is a locus of interaction, in the sense that it is one of the most frequent grammatical formats which speakers orient to in projecting what actions are being done by others' utterances and in acting on these projections. Yet the way in which the clause affords grammatical projectability varies significantly from language to language. In fact, it depends on the nature of the clausal grammatical formats which are available as resources in a language: in some languages these allow early projection in the turn unit (as in English), in others they do not (as in Japanese). We focus here on these two languages and show that their variable grammatical projectability has repercussions on the way in which three interactional phenomena – next-turn onset, co-construction, and turn-unit extension – are realized in the respective speech communities. In each case the practices used are precisely the ones which the clausal grammatical formats in the given language promote. The evidence thus suggests that clauses are interactionally warranted, if variably built, formats for social action.

[1]  F. Corblin,et al.  Discourse structure and anaphora: Barbara Fox, Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 173 pp. $34.50. , 1989 .

[2]  Hiroko Tanaka,et al.  Turn-taking in Japanese conversation : a study in grammar and interaction , 2000 .

[3]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[4]  Brenda Dervin,et al.  Rethinking Communication: Vol. 2: Paradigm Exemplars. , 1990 .

[5]  M. Selting On the Interplay of Syntax and Prosody in the Constitution of Turn-Constructional Units and Turns in Conversation , 1996 .

[6]  Saul Yurkievitch,et al.  Sentence , 1988 .

[7]  Barbara A. Fox Contextualization, indexicality, and the distributed nature of grammar , 1994 .

[8]  Barbara A. Fox,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair , 1996 .

[9]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Assessments and the Construction of Context , 1992 .

[10]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse: Collaboration, Overlap, and Syntactic Dissociation , 1996 .

[11]  D. Schiffrin,et al.  The Handbook of Discourse Analysis , 2001 .

[12]  C. Goodwin Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers , 1981 .

[13]  Makoto Hayashi,et al.  Projection and grammar: notes on the `action-projecting¿ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese , 2004 .

[14]  A. Głaz Point of View and Grammar: Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation (review) , 2004 .

[15]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Time in Action , 2002, Current Anthropology.

[16]  Gene H. Lerner Interaction and grammar: On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker , 1996 .

[17]  Uta M. Quasthoff,et al.  Aspects of Oral Communication , 1995 .

[18]  Marja-Liisa Helasvuo Argument splits in Finnish grammar and discourse , 2003 .

[19]  Tsuyoshi Ono,et al.  What can conversation tell us about syntax , 1996 .

[20]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Issues of Relevance for Discourse Analysis: Contingency in Action, Interaction and Co-Participant Context , 1996 .

[21]  S. Thompson Discourse and grammar , 1990 .

[22]  John W. Du Bois THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY OF LANGUAGE , 2003 .

[23]  Beatrice Szczepek Reed Turn-final intonation in English , 2004 .

[24]  Cecilia E. Ford,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns , 1996 .

[25]  G. Psathas Everyday language : studies in ethnomethodology , 1981 .

[26]  M. Tomasello The new psychology of language : cognitive and functional approaches to language structure , 1998 .

[27]  Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen,et al.  Prosody in conversation : interactional studies , 1996 .

[28]  Charles Goodwin Sentence Construction Within Interaction , 1995 .

[29]  E. Weber Varieties of Questions in English Conversation , 1993 .

[30]  Tsuyoshi Ono,et al.  Word order variability in Japanese conversation: Motivations and grammaticization , 1992 .

[31]  G. F. Tremblay,et al.  Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind, Gerald M. Edelman. 1992. Basic Books, New York, NY. 280 pages. ISBN: 0-465-05245-2. $25.00 , 1992 .

[32]  Hiroko Tanaka Turn Projection in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction , 2000 .

[33]  Paul J. Hopper Dispersed Verbal Predicates in Vernacular Written Narrative , 1991 .

[34]  Kazuko Matsumoto Fragmentation in Conversational Japanese: A Case Study , 1995 .

[35]  C. Goodwin The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation , 1979 .

[36]  Gene H. Lerner On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate , 2004 .

[37]  Susanne Vorreiter,et al.  Turn continuations : towards a cross-linguistic classification , 2003 .

[38]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  The language of turn and sequence , 2002 .

[39]  Polly E Szatrowski,et al.  Syntactic Projectability and Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation , 2002 .

[40]  Cecilia E. Ford Contingency and Units in Interaction , 2004 .

[41]  Brian D. Joseph,et al.  The handbook of historical linguistics , 2003 .

[42]  Hiroko Tanaka The implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japanese conversation: Complementizers as pivotal devices , 2001 .

[43]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency effects on French liaison , 2001 .

[44]  Makoto Hayashi,et al.  Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation , 1999 .

[45]  Joan L. Bybee The Emergent Lexicon , 2007 .

[46]  A. Roth Grammar and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News Interview , 1995 .

[47]  Susanne Günthner Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion : Grammatische, prosodische, rhetorisch-stilistische und interaktive Verfahren bei der Konstitution kommunikativer Muster und Gattungen , 2000 .

[48]  C. Goodwin Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn‐Beginning , 1980 .

[49]  Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen,et al.  Sound patterns in interaction : cross-linguistic studies from conversation , 2004 .

[50]  Tsuyoshi Ono,et al.  ‘Sentence’ in spontaneous spoken Japanese discourse , 2002 .

[51]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action , 1995 .

[52]  William Pagliuca Perspectives on Grammaticalization , 1994 .

[53]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[54]  Paul J. Hopper,et al.  Times of the Sign , 1992 .

[55]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Linguistics in Context : Connecting Observation and Understanding , 1988 .

[56]  G. Jefferson A Case of Precision Timing in Ordinary Conversation: Overlapped Tag-Positioned Address Terms in Closing Sequences , 1973 .

[57]  Gene H. Lerner,et al.  On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices , 1999 .

[58]  Margret Selting,et al.  The construction of units in conversational talk , 2000, Language in Society.

[59]  Jakob Steensig,et al.  Notes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkish conversation , 2001 .

[60]  L. Mondada Pour une linguistique interactionnelle , 1994 .

[61]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[62]  Joan L. Bybee 4. Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure , 2002 .

[63]  J. Haiman Ritualization and the development of language , 1994 .

[64]  T. Vance,et al.  Japanese/Korean linguistics , 1999 .

[65]  Paolo Leonardi,et al.  Discourse analysis and natural rhetorics , 1984 .

[66]  Barbara A. Fox Local patterns and general principles in cognitive processes: Anaphora in written and conversational English , 1986 .

[67]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[68]  P. Auer Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar , 2005 .

[69]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments , 1987 .

[70]  H. H. Clark Arenas of language use , 1993 .

[71]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[72]  Makoto Hayashi,et al.  Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation , 2003 .

[73]  G. Button,et al.  Talk and Social Organisation , 1988 .

[74]  Peter French,et al.  Turn-competitive incomings , 1983 .

[75]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[76]  Hiroko Tanaka,et al.  Adverbials for turn projection in Japanese: Toward a demystification of the “telepathic” mode of communication , 2001, Language in Society.

[77]  Jane Falk,et al.  The Conversational Duet , 1980 .

[78]  C. Goodwin Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments , 1986 .

[79]  Gene H. Lerner On the syntax of sentences-in-progress , 1991, Language in Society.

[80]  Makoto Hayashi Postposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation: An interactional account of a grammatical practice , 2001 .

[81]  Lorraine Edith Kumpf,et al.  Preferred argument structure : grammar as architecture for function , 2003 .

[82]  Marja-Liisa Helasvuo Syntax in the making , 2001 .

[83]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[84]  Joanne Scheibman,et al.  Point of view and grammar , 2002 .

[85]  Harry Hoijer,et al.  Language in Culture. , 1955 .

[86]  John W. Du Bois The Discourse Basis of Ergativity , 1987 .

[87]  P. Auer Prosody in conversation: On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations , 1996 .

[88]  Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen,et al.  Studies in Interactional Linguistics , 2001 .

[89]  J. Blau,et al.  Talk Is Cheap , 2006, IEEE Spectrum.