Predicting Invasions of Woody Plants Introduced into North America

Plant species continue to be introduced in North America for various purposes. If the trend continues, it is probable that some will escape cultivation and become invasive in native ecosystems. We present a retrospective analysis of several structural, life history, and biogeographical attributes of woody plants introduced in North America to determine which traits characterize species that have and have not invaded. Predictive models derived from discriminant analysis correctly classified 86.2% of the species in cross‐validation, whereas those derived from classification and regression trees classified 76% correctly. From these models we created a hierarchical predictive tree that allows the user to divide species into three categories: admit (low risk of invasiveness), deny admission (high risk of invasiveness), or delay admission for further analyses and/or monitor intensively (risk cannot adequately be assessed based on only the included attributes). We recommend that species that are highly invasive elsewhere not be allowed into the U.S. and that a more conservative introduction policy using a hierarchical predictive method be employed.

[1]  Joshua Lederberg,et al.  Letter from Joshua Lederberg to John H. Gibbons, United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment , 1986 .

[2]  J. Roy In search of the characteristics of plant invaders , 1990 .

[3]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[4]  D. Strong,et al.  Prediction and biological invasions. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological Invasion by Myrica faya Alters Ecosystem Development in Hawaii , 1987, Science.

[6]  P. Derfler,et al.  The United States Department of Agriculture , 1872, Nature.

[7]  D. Richardson,et al.  An expert system for screening potentially invasive alien plants in South African fynbos , 1995 .

[8]  C. J. Marchant,et al.  Evolution in Spartina (Gramineae): II. Chromosomes, basic relationships and the problem of S. ×townsendii agg. , 1968 .

[9]  H. G. Baker,et al.  The Evolution of Weeds , 1974 .

[10]  R. Hobbs,et al.  An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions , 1995 .

[11]  F. D. Panetta,et al.  Predicting the Australian Weed Status of Southern African Plants , 1993 .

[12]  R. Westbrooks Plant Protection Issues. I. A Commentary on New Weeds in the United States , 1991, Weed Technology.

[13]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Reducing the risks of nonindigenous species introductions. , 1995 .

[14]  M. Rejmánek What makes a species invasive , 1995 .

[15]  H. Waterworth Plant Introductions and Quarantine: The Need for Both , 1982 .

[16]  H. G. Baker,et al.  Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. , 1965 .

[17]  F. Panetta A system of assessing proposed plant introductions for weed potential. , 1993 .

[18]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Plant invasions : general aspects and special problems , 1995 .