Coal swelling strain and permeability change with injecting liquid/supercritical CO2 and N2 at stress-constrained conditions

Abstract CO 2 sequestration in deep unmineable coalbeds is regarded as a viable option for carbon storage. On the other hand, many uncertainties still remain due to the fact that coal interacts with CO 2 in a variety of ways. In Japan, the first CO 2 Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery field trials at Yubari were carried out. CO 2 was injected from an injection well into a coalbed at a depth of 900 m, and coalbed methane was collected from an observation well. Since the CO 2 injection rate was an order of magnitude lower than that estimated by preliminary analyses, N 2 was injected in an attempt to improve it. However, this caused only a temporary increase in the CO 2 injection rate. To better understand the phenomena observed in the Yubari field tests, two laboratory experiments were conducted under stress-constrained conditions. In Test I, liquid CO 2 was injected into a water-saturated coal specimen and then heated and injected as supercritical CO 2 . This was to simulate the initial stage of CO 2 injection at Yubari when the coal seam was saturated with water. In Test II, supercritical CO 2 was injected into a coal specimen saturated with N 2 , and then N 2 and CO 2 were repeatedly injected. This test was to simulate the case of N 2 injection and CO 2 re-injection at Yubari. In Test I, a volumetric swelling strain of 0.25 to 0.5% was observed after injecting liquid CO 2 . However, in Test II, the swelling strain was about 0.5 to 0.8% after injecting supercritical CO 2 . Following further injection of N 2 in Test II, slow strain recovery was observed in the coal. At an effective stress of 2 MPa, the permeability of the water-saturated coal specimen was 2 × 10 − 6  darcy. In contrast, the permeability of the N 2 -saturated coal specimen was originally 5 × 10 − 4 to 9 × 10 − 4  darcy, and after injection of supercritical CO 2 it decreased to 2 × 10 − 4  darcy. Further injections of N 2 and supercritical CO 2 caused little subsequent change in permeability. These results suggest that when liquid CO 2 was injected into the water-saturated coal specimen, it did not completely displace the water in the coal matrix. To further investigate the coal swelling and permeability behavior during gas injection, elastic wave velocity measurements were carried out and the results were found to validate those obtained using strain gauges. The results indicate that coal swelling is likely to be the main cause for the permeability change in the Yubari field tests and thus provide useful information for modeling the field trial.

[1]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 2. Adsorption rate modeling , 1999 .

[2]  Shinji Yamaguchi,et al.  CO2-ECBM field tests in the Ishikari Coal Basin of Japan , 2010 .

[3]  R. Nolen-Hoeksema,et al.  Estimating seismic velocities at ultrasonic frequencies in partially saturated rocks , 1994 .

[4]  P. J. Reucroft,et al.  Gas-induced swelling in coal , 1986 .

[5]  Jerzy Ziętek,et al.  Binary gas sorption/desorption experiments on a bituminous coal: Simultaneous measurements on sorption kinetics, volumetric strain and acoustic emission , 2009 .

[6]  T. Ohsumi,et al.  Laboratory Measurements on Gas Permeability and P-wave Velocity in Two Porous Sandstones During CO2 Flooding , 2004 .

[7]  Z. Xue Application of Rock Physics Study to Seismic Monitoring of Injected CO2 in Geological Sequestration , 2005 .

[8]  David R. Cole,et al.  Adsorption Kinetics of CO2, CH4, and their Equimolar Mixture on Coal from the Black Warrior Basin, West-Central Alabama , 2009 .

[9]  Tapan Mukerji,et al.  Bounds on low‐frequency seismic velocities in partially saturated rocks , 1998 .

[10]  Philip L. Walker,et al.  A direct measurement of expansion in coals and macerais induced by carbon dioxide and methanol , 1988 .

[11]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2010 .

[12]  C. M. White,et al.  Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in Coal with Enhanced Coalbed Methane RecoveryA Review , 2005 .

[13]  Jeffrey R. Levine,et al.  Model study of the influence of matrix shrinkage on absolute permeability of coal bed reservoirs , 1996, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[14]  R. Skawiński Considerations referring to coal swelling accompanying the sorption of gases and water , 1999 .

[15]  P. J. Reucroft,et al.  Effect of pressure on carbon dioxide induced coal swelling , 1987 .

[16]  K. Wolf,et al.  Differential swelling and permeability change of coal in response to CO2 injection for ECBM , 2008 .

[17]  L. Connell,et al.  A theoretical model for gas adsorption-induced coal swelling , 2007 .