Assessment on bulk solids best practice techniques for flow characterization and storage/handling equipment design for biomass materials of different classes

This paper shows the results of a collaborative project in which four different laboratories have carried out complementary characterization tests on samples of the same set of lignocellulosic biomass materials with the objectives of better understanding their properties and identifying any critical features of the different characterization procedures. Three different types of material were used as model biomasses: 1) Scots pine wood chips, as an example of a coarse and flaky particulate biomass with some elastic properties; 2) chopped straw of reed canary grass as a nesting biomass having long and flaky fibers; and 3) Scots pine wood powder as a fine particulate with elastic and cohesive properties. Particle size and shape analyses were carried out with; calipers, 2D image analysis, 3D image analysis (ScanChip) and through mechanical sieving. Applications and validity limits of each of these techniques are evaluated and discussed. The flow function and internal friction were determined with a Schulze ring shear tester, a Brookfield powder flow tester and a large ring shear tester. No significant differences in the results generated by these shear testing techniques were found. Wall friction measurements were carried out with a Schulze ring shear tester; a Brookfield powder flow tester; a large Jenike shear tester and a Casagrande shear box. Results, in this case, showed significant differences with a higher wall friction coefficient obtained with the larger shear cell. Additionally, tensile strengths of biomass materials were measured by the use of a novel measurement technique. Arching tests were carried out in a pilot scale plane silo with variable hopper geometry and results were compared with those predicted by applying the Jenike procedure and a modified procedure which assumed that tensile strength was the controlling material property (rather than unconfined yield strength). Finally, safety of handling and storage was assessed by carrying out explosion tests on dusts from Scots pine and reed canary grass.

[1]  Jan Erik Mattsson.  Tendency to bridge over openings for chopped Phalaris and straw of Triticum mixed in different proportions with wood chips , 1997 .

[2]  P. C. Arnold,et al.  Improved analytical flowfactors for mass-flow hoppers , 1976 .

[3]  Hai‐feng Liu,et al.  Gravity discharge characteristics of biomass-coal blends in a hopper , 2014 .

[4]  D. Barletta,et al.  Characterization of Woody Biomass Flowability , 2011 .

[5]  R. J. Berry,et al.  Investigation of the effect of test procedure factors on the failure loci and derived failure functions obtained from annular shear cells , 2007 .

[6]  Bo Johnsson,et al.  NIR techniques create added values for the pellet and biofuel industry. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Jan Erik Mattsson,et al.  Influence of particle size and moisture content on tendency to bridge in biofuels made from willow shoots. , 2003 .

[8]  Carlos Henrique Ataíde,et al.  Physical characterization of sweet sorghum bagasse, tobacco residue, soy hull and fiber sorghum bagasse particles: Density, particle size and shape distributions , 2013 .

[9]  Robert C. Brown,et al.  Ancillary equipment for biomass gasification , 2002 .

[10]  Daniel C. Yoder,et al.  Flowability parameters for chopped switchgrass, wheat straw and corn stover , 2009 .

[11]  R. J. Berry,et al.  Characterisation of extreme shape materials: “biomass and waste materials” , 2010 .

[12]  Rolf K. Eckhoff,et al.  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries , 1991 .

[13]  Diego Barletta,et al.  Flow properties and arching behavior of biomass particulate solids , 2013 .

[14]  Tasneem Abbasi,et al.  Dust explosions-cases, causes, consequences, and control. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  Jan Erik Mattsson,et al.  Particle and handling characteristics of wood fuel powder: effects of different mills , 2002 .

[16]  A. W. Jenike,et al.  A flow-no-flow criterion in the gravity flow of powders in converging channels , 1965 .

[17]  Torbjörn A. Lestander,et al.  Process optimization of combined biomass torrefaction and pelletization for fuel pellet production – A parametric study , 2015 .

[18]  C. González-Montellano,et al.  Values for particle-scale properties of biomass briquettes made from agroforestry residues , 2014 .

[19]  Anders Nordin,et al.  NIR provides excellent predictions of properties of biocoal from torrefaction and pyrolysis of biomass , 2014 .

[20]  Enrique Teruel,et al.  Milling and handling Cynara Cardunculus L. for use as solid biofuel: Experimental tests , 2012 .

[21]  Robert Samuelsson,et al.  Effects of moisture content, torrefaction temperature, and die temperature in pilot scale pelletizing of torrefied Norway spruce , 2013 .

[22]  Michael Kamm,et al.  Biorefinery Systems – An Overview , 2008 .

[23]  X. Bi,et al.  Overview and some issues related to co‐firing biomass and coal , 2008 .

[24]  I. Arauzo,et al.  Hammer mill operating and biomass physical conditions effects on particle size distribution of solid pulverized biofuels , 2014 .

[25]  Hai‐feng Liu,et al.  Study of flow characteristics of biomass and biomass–coal blends , 2015 .

[26]  R. J. Berry,et al.  Mass flow and variability in screw feeding of biomass powders – relations to particle and bulk properties , 2015 .

[27]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: A review , 2011 .

[28]  Emmanuel Lefrançois,et al.  Dust generation from powders: A characterization test based on stirred fluidization , 2014 .

[29]  Dingena L. Schott,et al.  Physical properties of solid biomass , 2011 .

[30]  Christopher W. Myers,et al.  Understanding cost growth and performance shortfalls in pioneer process plants , 1981 .

[31]  Haifeng Liu,et al.  Experimental research on shape and size distribution of biomass particle , 2012 .

[32]  Giancarlo Raiconi,et al.  Optimization of a Multiproduct Lignocellulosic Biorefinery using a MILP Approximation , 2014 .

[33]  Sylvia H. Larsson,et al.  Clarifying sub-processes in continuous ring die pelletizing through die temperature control , 2014 .

[34]  Sylvia H. Larsson.  Kinematic wall friction properties of reed canary grass powder at high and low normal stresses , 2010 .

[35]  Phani Adapa,et al.  Physical and frictional properties of non-treated and steam exploded barley, canola, oat and wheat straw grinds , 2010 .

[36]  D. Barletta,et al.  Preliminary Assessment of a Simple Method for Evaluating the Flow Properties of Solid Recovered Fuels , 2009 .

[37]  Enrique Teruel,et al.  Analysis of standard sieving method for milled biomass through image processing. Effects of particle shape and size for poplar and corn stover , 2014 .

[38]  A. W. Jenike,et al.  STORAGE AND FLOW OF SOLIDS :(REV. 1980. ) , 1980 .

[39]  Diego Barletta,et al.  Arch-Free flow in aerated silo discharge of cohesive powders , 2009 .

[40]  Jan Erik Mattsson,et al.  Tendency of wood fuels from whole trees, logging residues and roundwood to bridge over openings , 2004 .

[41]  A. W. Jenike.  Gravity flow of bulk solids , 1961 .

[42]  M. Moya,et al.  Determination of the Mechanical Properties of Powdered Agricultural Products and Sugar , 2009 .

[43]  O. O. Fasina,et al.  Flow and physical properties of switchgrass, peanut hull, and poultry litter. , 2006 .

[44]  Robert Samuelsson,et al.  Industrial scale biofuel pellet production from blends of unbarked softwood and hardwood stems—the effects of raw material composition and moisture content on pellet quality , 2012 .

[45]  Vida N. Sharifi,et al.  Investigation into the Flow Properties of Coarse Solid Fuels for Use in Industrial Feed Systems , 2015 .

[46]  Shumiao Chen,et al.  Experimental and numerical determination of mechanical properties of polygonal wood particles and their flow analysis in silos , 2013 .