A neutral‐niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks

Recently, there has been a vigorous interest in community ecology about the structure of mutualistic networks and its importance for species persistence and coevolution. However, the mechanisms shaping mutualistic networks have been rarely explored. Here we extend for the first time the neutral theory of biodiversity to a multi trophic system. We focus on nestedness, a distinctive pattern of mutualistic community assembly showing two characteristics, namely, asymmetrical specialization (specialists interacting with generalists) and a generalist core (generalists interacting with generalists). We investigate the importance of relative species abundance (RSA) for the nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Our results show that neutral mutualistic communities give rise to networks considerably more nested than real communities. RSA explains 60–70% of nested patterns in two real communities studied here, while 30–40% of nestedness is still unexplained. The nested pattern in real communities is better explained when we introduce interaction-specific species traits such as forbidden links and intensity of dependence (relative importance of fruits for the diet of a frugivore) in our analysis. The fact that neutral mutualistic communities exhibit a perfectly nested structure and do not show a random or compartmentalized structure, underlines the importance of RSA in the assembly of mutualistic networks.

[1]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Frugivore‐Mediated Selection on Fruit and Seed Size: Birds and St. Lucie's Cherry, Prunus Mahaleb , 1995 .

[2]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[3]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Effects of phenotypic complementarity and phylogeny on the nested structure of mutualistic networks , 2007 .

[4]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Structure in plant–animal interaction assemblages , 2006 .

[5]  D. Snow,et al.  Birds and berries : a study of an ecological interaction , 1990 .

[6]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  A neutral sampling formula for multiple samples and an 'exact' test of neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[7]  P. Jordano.  Diet. Frugivory choice and variation in body condition of frugivorous warblers in mediterranea schrubland , 1988 .

[8]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The merits of neutral theory. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Sérgio Furtado dos Reis,et al.  The nested structure of marine cleaning symbiosis: is it like flowers and bees? , 2007, Biology Letters.

[10]  Luis Santamaría,et al.  Linkage Rules for Plant–Pollinator Networks: Trait Complementarity or Exploitation Barriers? , 2007, PLoS biology.

[11]  Cynthia S. Brown,et al.  Community assembly and invasion: An experimental test of neutral versus niche processes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Fenner.  Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities , 1992 .

[13]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks , 2007 .

[14]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Eric Garnier,et al.  From Plant Traits to Plant Communities: A Statistical Mechanistic Approach to Biodiversity , 2006, Science.

[16]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity , 2005 .

[17]  J. Thompson.  The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution , 2005 .

[18]  Paulo R Guimarães,et al.  Asymmetries in specialization in ant–plant mutualistic networks , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  G. Bell.  Neutral macroecology. , 2001, Science.

[20]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  The pollination ecology of an assemblage of grassland asclepiads in South Africa. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[21]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[22]  J. Denslow,et al.  Neotropical Avian Frugivores: Patterns of Behavior, Morphology, and Nutrition, with Consequences for Fruit Selection , 1985 .

[23]  M. McPeek,et al.  Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. , 2006, Ecology.

[24]  Wirt Atmar,et al.  The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat , 1993, Oecologia.

[25]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[26]  Stephen J Cornell,et al.  Species-area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[27]  B. Krasnov,et al.  Species abundance and the distribution of specialization in host–parasite interaction networks , 2005 .

[28]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant /flower visitor web , 2006 .

[29]  Manly.  Testing for latitudinal and other body-size gradients , 1998 .

[30]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. , 2006 .

[31]  P. Jordano.  Geographical ecology and variation of plant-seed disperser interactions: southern Spanish junipers and frugivorous thrushes , 1993, Vegetatio.

[32]  Han Olff,et al.  A novel genealogical approach to neutral biodiversity theory , 2004 .

[33]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2003 .

[34]  P. Jordano.  Fruits and Frugivory , 2000 .

[35]  Brian J. McGill,et al.  Null Versus Neutral Models: What's The Difference? , 2006 .

[36]  Geographical ecology and variation of plant-seed disperser interactions: southern Spanish junipers and frugivorous thrushes , 1993 .

[37]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  JoH• T. Emle.  POPULATION DENSITIES OF BIRDS DERIVED FROM TRANSECT COUNTS , 2003 .

[39]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  NULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2003 .

[40]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[41]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Redes complejas de interacciones planta-animal , 2009 .

[43]  P. Jordano,et al.  SEED DISPERSER EFFECTIVENESS: THE QUANTITY COMPONENT AND PATTERNS OF SEED RAIN FOR PRUNUS MAHALEB , 2000 .

[44]  P. Jordano.  Spatial and temporal variation in the avian-frugivore assemblage of Prunus mahaleb : patterns and consequences , 1994 .

[45]  Paulo Guimarães,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[47]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Finding NEMO: nestedness engendered by mutualistic organization in anemonefish and their hosts , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.