Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size.

BACKGROUND With the increasing use of neoadjuvant and minimally invasive therapy, the accuracy of preoperative determination of breast tumor size becomes important. Therefore, we undertook this study to compare mammography and ultrasonography (US). METHODS A total of 180 invasive breast cancer patients were prospectively examined by mammography and US; 146 eligible patients had tumors visualized by both modalities. RESULTS In 69% of cases, US was better than or equivalent to mammography in determining tumor size. Both underestimated tumor size; mean (median) underestimation was 3.8 +/- 0.7 mm (1.7 mm) by US and 3.5 +/- 0.9 mm (2 mm) by mammogram. Maximal tumor dimension was accurate within 5 mm in 65% of cases by mammography and 75% of cases by US. For mammographically determined size (versus pathologic size) correlation, r, was 0.4 and for US it was 0.63 and improved for only T1 and T2 tumors. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that US is more accurate than mammography in assessing breast cancer size.

[1]  M. Teboul.  A new concept in breast investigation: echo-histological acino-ductal analysis or analytic echography. , 1988, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[2]  M. Sabel,et al.  Cryosurgery of breast cancer. , 1997, Archives of surgery.

[3]  H. Meden,et al.  A clinical, mammographic, sonographic and histologic evaluation of breast cancer , 1995, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[4]  W. Yang,et al.  Sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and mammographic assessments of preoperative size of breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  C. Redmond,et al.  Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1995, New England Journal of Medicine.

[6]  B. Fornage,et al.  Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size , 1987, Cancer.

[7]  A study testing the routine use of ultrasound measurements when selecting the electron energy for breast boost radiotherapy. , 1999, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[8]  Size of breast cancer on ultrasonography, cut-surface of resected specimen, and palpation. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  P. Skaane,et al.  Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma , 1999, Acta radiologica.

[10]  J. Pain,et al.  Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. , 1992, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  D M Ikeda,et al.  Radiofrequency ablation of breast cancer: first report of an emerging technology. , 1999, Archives of surgery.

[12]  U. Chetty,et al.  Ultrasonography as a method of measuring breast tumour size and monitoring response to primary systemic treatment , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  F. Tresserra,et al.  Assessment of Breast Cancer Size: Sonographic and Pathologic Correlation , 1999, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[14]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  T. Hieken,et al.  A prospective analysis of office-based breast ultrasound. , 1998, Archives of surgery.

[16]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[17]  C. Finlayson,et al.  Ultrasound can estimate the pathologic size of infiltrating ductal carcinoma. , 2000, Archives of surgery.