Bending the Rules: Widefield Microscopy and the Abbe Limit of Resolution

One of the most fundamental concepts of microscopy is that of resolution–the ability to clearly distinguish two objects as separate. Recent advances such as structured illumination microscopy (SIM) and point localization techniques including photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM), and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) strive to overcome the inherent limits of resolution of the modern light microscope. These techniques, however, are not always feasible or optimal for live cell imaging. Thus, in this review, we explore three techniques for extracting high resolution data from images acquired on a widefield microscope–deconvolution, model convolution, and Gaussian fitting. Deconvolution is a powerful tool for restoring a blurred image using knowledge of the point spread function (PSF) describing the blurring of light by the microscope, although care must be taken to ensure accuracy of subsequent quantitative analysis. The process of model convolution also requires knowledge of the PSF to blur a simulated image which can then be compared to the experimentally acquired data to reach conclusions regarding its geometry and fluorophore distribution. Gaussian fitting is the basis for point localization microscopy, and can also be applied to tracking spot motion over time or measuring spot shape and size. All together, these three methods serve as powerful tools for high‐resolution imaging using widefield microscopy. J. Cell. Physiol. 229: 132–138, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Dylan T Burnette,et al.  Bayesian localisation microscopy reveals nanoscale podosome dynamics , 2011, Nature Methods.

[2]  J. Spudich,et al.  Colocalization of fluorescent probes: accurate and precise registration with nanometer resolution. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[3]  Jason R Swedlow,et al.  Quantitative fluorescence microscopy and image deconvolution. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[4]  David J Odde,et al.  Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Weidong Yang,et al.  Single-molecule studies of nucleocytoplasmic transport: from one dimension to three dimensions. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[6]  Yaron M Sigal,et al.  A high-density 3D localization algorithm for stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy , 2012, Optical Nanoscopy.

[7]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Pericentric chromatin loops function as a nonlinear spring in mitotic force balance , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  H. Leonhardt,et al.  A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  D. Agard Optical sectioning microscopy: cellular architecture in three dimensions. , 1984, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[10]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Bub1 Kinase and Sgo1 Modulate Pericentric Chromatin in Response to Altered Microtubule Dynamics , 2012, Current Biology.

[11]  W. Webb,et al.  Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[12]  J. Spudich,et al.  Single molecule high-resolution colocalization of Cy3 and Cy5 attached to macromolecules measures intramolecular distances through time. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  E. Salmon,et al.  Counting kinetochore protein numbers in budding yeast using genetically encoded fluorescent proteins. , 2008, Methods in cell biology.

[14]  Mark B. Cannell,et al.  Image Enhancement by Deconvolution , 2006 .

[15]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[16]  Keith A. Lidke,et al.  Simultaneous multiple-emitter fitting for single molecule super-resolution imaging , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[17]  William H. Richardson,et al.  Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration , 1972 .

[18]  E. Salmon,et al.  Molecular architecture of a kinetochore–microtubule attachment site , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  Enrico Gratton,et al.  Exploring dynamics in living cells by tracking single particles , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[20]  Valerie C. Coffman,et al.  Counting protein molecules using quantitative fluorescence microscopy. , 2012, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Optimized localization-analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy , 2010, Nature Methods.

[22]  Prabuddha Sengupta,et al.  Visualizing cell structure and function with point-localization superresolution imaging. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[23]  Julian Haase,et al.  Pericentric Chromatin Is Organized into an Intramolecular Loop in Mitosis , 2008, Current Biology.

[24]  David R. Soll,et al.  Confocal Microscopy of Living Cells , 2006 .

[25]  S. Inoué,et al.  Foundations of Confocal Scanned Imaging in Light Microscopy , 2006 .

[26]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Cohesin, condensin, and the intramolecular centromere loop together generate the mitotic chromatin spring , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  Erik Ostermann,et al.  Live Cell Imaging A Laboratory Manual , 2016 .

[28]  Xiaohu Wan,et al.  Asymmetric Chromosome Oscillation during Mitosis and Protein Architecture of the Human Kinetochore Measured by K-SHREC (Kinetochore-Speckle High Resolution Co-Localization) , 2008 .

[29]  E. Salmon,et al.  Point centromeres contain more than a single centromere-specific Cse4 (CENP-A) nucleosome , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  S. Gibson,et al.  Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  Lord Rayleigh,et al.  On the Theory of Optical Images, with Special Reference to the Microscope , 1903 .

[32]  P. Jansson Deconvolution of images and spectra , 1997 .

[33]  P. Shaw Comparison of Widefield/Deconvolution and Confocal Microscopy for Three-Dimensional Imaging , 2006 .

[34]  T J Holmes,et al.  Blind deconvolution of quantum-limited incoherent imagery: maximum-likelihood approach. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  In Vivo Protein Architecture of the Eukaryotic Kinetochore with Nanometer Scale Accuracy , 2009, Current Biology.

[36]  I T Young,et al.  Model-based resolution: applying the theory in quantitative microscopy. , 2000, Applied optics.

[37]  David J. Odde,et al.  Model Convolution: A Computational Approach to Digital Image Interpretation , 2010, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[38]  L. Lucy An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions , 1974 .

[39]  Paul S. Maddox,et al.  Nucleosomal composition at the centromere: a numbers game , 2013, Chromosome Research.

[40]  B. Chromy,et al.  Efficient maximum likelihood estimator fitting of histograms , 2010, Nature Methods.

[41]  Jonas F. Dorn,et al.  Octameric CENP-A Nucleosomes Are Present at Human Centromeres throughout the Cell Cycle , 2013, Current Biology.

[42]  Jennifer C. Waters,et al.  Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  K. Jaqaman,et al.  Robust single particle tracking in live cell time-lapse sequences , 2008, Nature Methods.

[44]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Uncovering chromatin's contribution to the mitotic spindle: Applications of computational and polymer models. , 2010, Biochimie.

[45]  S. Stallinga,et al.  Accuracy of the gaussian point spread function model in 2D localization microscopy. , 2010, Optics express.

[46]  J N Turner,et al.  Blind deconvolution of fluorescence micrographs by maximum-likelihood estimation. , 1995, Applied optics.

[47]  K. Neyts,et al.  The influence of movement on the localization precision of sub‐resolution particles in fluorescence microscopy , 2012, Journal of biophotonics.

[48]  David S C Biggs,et al.  3D Deconvolution Microscopy , 2010, Current protocols in cytometry.

[49]  P. Shaw,et al.  Comparison of Wide-Field/Deconvolution and Confocal Microscopy for 3D Imaging , 1995 .

[50]  R. Sec. XV. On the theory of optical images, with special reference to the microscope , 2009 .

[51]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[52]  Brian D. Slaughter,et al.  Cell-Cycle-Coupled Structural Oscillation of Centromeric Nucleosomes in Yeast , 2012, Cell.

[53]  E. Abbe Beiträge zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung , 1873 .

[54]  J. Swedlow,et al.  A workingperson's guide to deconvolution in light microscopy. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[55]  S. Holden,et al.  DAOSTORM: an algorithm for high- density super-resolution microscopy , 2011, Nature Methods.

[56]  George Biddell Airy,et al.  On the diffraction of an object-glass with circular aperture , 1835 .

[57]  D. Agard,et al.  Fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions. , 1989, Methods in cell biology.

[58]  Peter K Sorger,et al.  Quantitative microscopy of green fluorescent protein-labeled yeast. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[59]  P. Sorger,et al.  Automatic fluorescent tag detection in 3D with super‐resolution: application to the analysis of chromosome movement , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[60]  Judith Berman,et al.  Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment site is conserved between point and regional centromeres , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[61]  Bruce F. McEwen,et al.  Protein Architecture of the Human Kinetochore Microtubule Attachment Site , 2009, Cell.

[62]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Towards building a chromosome segregation machine , 2010, Nature.

[63]  J. Sibarita Deconvolution microscopy. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[64]  Russell M. Taylor,et al.  FluoroSim: A Visual Problem-Solving Environment for Fluorescence Microscopy , 2008, VCBM.

[65]  Keith A. Lidke,et al.  Fast, single-molecule localization that achieves theoretically minimum uncertainty , 2010, Nature Methods.

[66]  Ajit P. Joglekar,et al.  The Budding Yeast Point Centromere Associates with Two Cse4 Molecules during Mitosis , 2013, Current Biology.

[67]  M K Cheezum,et al.  Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[68]  M. Minsky Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope , 1988 .