Contribution of the Imaging System Components in the Overall Error of the Two-Dimensional Digital Image Correlation Technique

Digital image correlation (DIC) is one of the most widely used non-invasive methods for measuring full-field surface strains in a wide variety of applications. The DIC method has been used by numerous researchers for measuring strains during the plastic range of deformation where the strains are relatively large. The estimation of the amount of background strain error in the measurements is of prime importance for determining the applicability of this method for measuring small strains (such as the elastic strains in metals, ceramics, bone samples, etc.). In this study, the strain errors in 2D-DIC measurements associated with different types of imaging systems were investigated. In-plane rigid-body-translation, experiments were used to estimate the overall amount of error in DIC displacement and strain measurements. Different types of cameras having different types of sensors and different spatial resolutions were used in the study. Also, for the same type of camera, different types of lenses were used. Results show that the DIC measurement accuracy depends on the magnitude of image displacement and that different error estimation parameters can be used for quantifying the accuracy of the measurements. Also, the effect of the lens on measurement accuracy is more pronounced than that of the camera. Furthermore, imaging conditions such as image sharpness and camera gain also affect the accuracy. Further still, the measurement accuracy was found to be influenced by the direction of translation. The results indicate that measurement error can be reduced by orienting the camera such that the major displacement direction is parallel to the width direction of the image. The experimental approach used in this study can be used for quantitatively assessing the quality of the different types of cameras and lenses and to determine their suitability for use in experimental techniques that depend on image analysis such as DIC and particle image velocimetry (PIV).

[1]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics , 1985 .

[2]  Dwayne Arola,et al.  Displacement/strain measurements using an optical microscope and digital image correlation , 2006 .

[3]  Neil A. Hoult,et al.  Experimental accuracy of two dimensional strain measurements using Digital Image Correlation , 2013 .

[4]  Jean-José Orteu,et al.  3-D computer vision in experimental mechanics , 2007 .

[5]  Michel Stanislas,et al.  Main results of the third international PIV Challenge , 2008 .

[6]  Vikrant Tiwari,et al.  Assessment of High Speed Imaging Systems for 2D and 3D Deformation Measurements: Methodology Development and Validation , 2007 .

[7]  Y. Wang,et al.  Impact of lens distortions on strain measurements obtained with 2D digital image correlation , 2013 .

[8]  Ala Hijazi,et al.  A novel ultra-high speed camera for digital image processing applications , 2008 .

[9]  Pascal Doumalin,et al.  Digital Image Correlation accuracy: influence of kind of speckle and recording setup , 2010 .

[10]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review , 2009 .

[11]  Michael A. Sutton,et al.  The effect of out-of-plane motion on 2D and 3D digital image correlation measurements , 2008 .

[12]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[13]  Christian J. Kähler,et al.  Influence of Camera's Optical Axis Non-perpendicularity on Measurement Accuracy of Two-dimensional Digital Image Correlation , 2011 .

[14]  C. Kähler,et al.  On the uncertainty of digital PIV and PTV near walls , 2012 .

[15]  J. Westerweel Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[16]  M. Z. Siddiqui,et al.  An Out-of-Plane Motion Compensation Strategy for Improving Material Parameter Estimation Accuracy with 2D Field Measurements , 2014 .

[17]  H. Haddadi,et al.  Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique , 2008 .

[18]  Maurice Whelan,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of optical systems for full-field strain measurement , 2007 .

[19]  Franccois Hild,et al.  Digital Image Correlation: from Displacement Measurement to Identification of Elastic Properties – a Review , 2006 .

[20]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method , 1983, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[22]  Yuh J. Chao,et al.  Advances in Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Computer Vision , 2000 .

[23]  William C. Sweatt,et al.  Camera System Resolution and its Influence on Digital Image Correlation , 2015 .

[24]  Liqun Tang,et al.  Systematic errors in two-dimensional digital image correlation due to lens distortion , 2013 .

[25]  Hisao Kikuta,et al.  Lens distortion correction for digital image correlation by measuring rigid body displacement , 2006 .

[26]  M. Gharib,et al.  On errors of digital particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[27]  Fabrice Pierron,et al.  Assessment of the metrological performance of an in situ storage image sensor ultra-high speed camera for full-field deformation measurements , 2014 .

[28]  I. Grant Particle image velocimetry: A review , 1997 .

[29]  C. Willert,et al.  Digital particle image velocimetry , 1991 .

[30]  Christian J. Kähler,et al.  Comparison of CCD, CMOS and intensified cameras , 2007 .

[31]  Paul J Strykowski,et al.  Bias and precision errors of digital particle image velocimetry , 2000 .

[32]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Accurate measurement of three-dimensional deformations in deformable and rigid bodies using computer vision , 1993 .