Unilateral versus bilateral robot-assisted rehabilitation on arm-trunk control and functions post stroke: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAlthough the effects of robot-assisted arm training after stroke are promising, the relative effects of unilateral (URT) vs. bilateral (BRT) robot-assisted arm training remain uncertain. This study compared the effects of URT vs. BRT on upper extremity (UE) control, trunk compensation, and function in patients with chronic stroke.MethodThis was a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The intervention was implemented at 4 hospitals. Fifty-three patients with stroke were randomly assigned to URT, BRT, or control treatment (CT). Each group received UE training for 90 to 105 min/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. The kinematic variables for arm motor control and trunk compensation included normalized movement time, normalized movement units, and the arm-trunk contribution slope in unilateral and bilateral tasks. Motor function and daily function were measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and ABILHAND Questionnaire.ResultsThe BRT and CT groups elicited significantly larger slope values (i.e., less trunk compensation) at the start of bilateral reaching than the URT group. URT led to significantly better effects on WMFT-Time than BRT. Differences in arm control kinematics and performance on the MAL and ABILHAND among the 3 groups were not significant.ConclusionsBRT and URT resulted in differential improvements in specific UE/trunk performance in patients with stroke. BRT elicited larger benefits than URT on reducing compensatory trunk movements at the beginning of reaching. In contrast, URT produced better improvements in UE temporal efficiency. These relative effects on movement kinematics, however, did not translate into differential benefits in daily functions.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00917605.

[1]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[2]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  S. Hesse,et al.  Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[7]  J Whitall,et al.  Temporal and spatial control following bilateral versus unilateral training. , 2008, Human movement science.

[8]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice , 2006 .

[9]  N. Byl,et al.  Interventions for clients with movement limitations , 2013 .

[10]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[11]  M. Levin,et al.  Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale , 2002, Stroke.

[13]  G. Giles,et al.  Comparison of constraint-induced movement therapy and bilateral treatment of equal intensity in people with chronic upper-extremity dysfunction after cerebrovascular accident. , 2010, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[14]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[15]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Performance, Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb exercise therapy after stroke: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[18]  J. Liepert.  Evidence-based therapies for upper extremity dysfunction. , 2010, Current opinion in neurology.

[19]  T. Matyas,et al.  Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[20]  R. Macwalter,et al.  A comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper-limb task training in early poststroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  P. Dario,et al.  Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[22]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  M. Goosses.  Bilateral and Unilateral Arm Training Improve Motor Function through Differing Neuroplastic Mechanisms: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011 .

[24]  Henning Schmidt,et al.  Machines to support motor rehabilitation after stroke: 10 years of experience in Berlin. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  Jeffery J. Summers,et al.  Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: A TMS study , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[26]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[27]  P. Stratford,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[28]  B. Lindmark,et al.  Responsiveness and validity of the Motor Activity Log in patients during the subacute phase after stroke , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[30]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[31]  Li-ling Chuang,et al.  Randomized Trial of Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training for the Rehabilitation of Upper-Limb Motor Control and Function After Stroke , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[32]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[33]  Sandi J. Spaulding,et al.  Motor Control and Motor Learning: Implications for Treatment of Individuals Post Stroke , 2001 .

[34]  J. Thonnard,et al.  ABILHAND: a Rasch-built measure of manual ability. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[36]  H. Chui,et al.  The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. , 1987, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[37]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[39]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[40]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[41]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[42]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[43]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[44]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Haptic Guidance Can Enhance Motor Learning of a Steering Task , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[45]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[46]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[47]  Hsieh-Ching Chen,et al.  Pilot comparative study of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted training on upper-extremity performance in patients with stroke. , 2012, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[48]  J. Thonnard,et al.  Validation of the ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[49]  Amir Herman,et al.  Intention-to-treat analysis and accounting for missing data in orthopaedic randomized clinical trials. , 2009, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume.

[50]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[51]  Daniel M. Corcos,et al.  Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[52]  K. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Kinematic Variables Quantifying Upper-Extremity Performance After Stroke During Reaching and Drinking From a Glass , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[53]  J. Whitall,et al.  Temporal coordination of the arms during bilateral simultaneous and sequential movements in patients with chronic hemiparesis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Real-time computer modeling of weakness following stroke optimizes robotic assistance for movement therapy , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.