CO2 Emission Abatement From Fossil Fuel Power Plants by Exhaust Gas Treatment

In this paper thermodynamical and economic analyses of fossil-fuel-fired power plants, equipped with systems for CO2 recovery, are presented. The investigation has been developed with reference to power plants representative both of consolidated technology (i.e., steam cycle and combined cycle power plants), and of emerging or innovative technology (integrated coal gasification combined cycle, IGCC, and advanced mixed cycle, AMC). There are two main methods to reduce CO 2 from power plant flue gas: physical and chemical absorption. In this work chemical absorption and liquefaction of CO 2 removed have been considered. With reference to thermodynamical and economic performance, significant comparisons have been made between the above introduced reference plants. An efficiency decrease and an increase in the cost of electricity has been obtained when power plants are equipped with CO2 removal systems and units for liquefaction of the removed carbon dioxide. The main results of the performed investigation are quite variable among the different power plants here considered: their efficiency decreases in a range of 6 percentage points to nearly 13, while the electricity production cost increases in a range of 25% until 72%. The AMC stands out among the other power plants here analyzed because, after CO2 recovery, it exhibits the lowest net work output decrease, the highest net efficiency and the lowest final specific CO2 emission. In addition to this, its economic impact is favorable when the AMC is equipped with systems for CO2 recovery. As a result it achieves a net electric efficiency of about 50% with a carbon dioxide emission of about 0.04 kg/kWh, and the electricity production cost rises to about 25% in comparison with an AMC without CO2 removal and liquefaction systems. Copyright © 2003 by ASME.

[1]  T. Yagi,et al.  Application of chemical absorption process to CO2 recovery from flue gas generated in power plants , 1992 .

[2]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  PREDICTING THE ULTIMATE PERFORMANCE OF ADVANCED POWER CYCLES BASED ON VERY HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS TURBINE ENGINES , 1993 .

[3]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  CO2 Emission Abatement in IGCC Power Plants by Semiclosed Cycles: Part A — With Oxygen-Blown Combustion , 1998 .

[4]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Comparison of two CO2 removal options in combined cycle power plants , 1998 .

[5]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  A comparative analysis of IGCCs with CO2 sequestration , 1999 .

[6]  C. Caputo,et al.  Internal Combustion Steam Cycle (G.I.S.T. Cycle): Thermodynamical Feasibility and Plant Lay-Out Proposals , 1997 .

[7]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycles With Low CO2 Emissions , 1999 .

[8]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  The Recovery of Carbon Dioxide from Power Plants , 1989 .

[9]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  Shift Reactors and Physical Absorption for Low-CO2 Emission IGCCs , 1998 .

[10]  R. J. Allam,et al.  A study of the extraction of CO2 from the flue gas of a 500 MW pulverised coal fired boiler , 1992 .

[11]  P.-M. Weinspach,et al.  Study on the CO2-recovery from an ICGCC-plant , 1992 .

[12]  H. Haselbacher,et al.  Effects of Steam Reheat in Advanced Steam Injected Gas Turbine Cycles , 1998 .

[13]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  An assessment of the thermodynamic performance of mixed gas-steam cycles. Part A: Intercooled and steam-injected cycles , 1995 .