Oscillatory Excitation of Unsteady Compressible Flows over Airfoils at Flight Reynolds Numbers

An experimental investigation, aimed at delaying flow separation due to the occurrence of a shock-wave-boundary-layer interaction, is reported. The experiment was performed using a NACA 0012 airfoil and a NACA 0015 airfoil at high Reynolds number incompressible and compressible flow conditions. The effects of Mach and Reynolds numbers were identified, using the capabilities of the cryogenic-pressurized facility to maintain one parameter fixed and change the other. Significant Reynolds number effects were identified in the baseline compressible flow conditions even at Reynolds number of 10 and 20 million. The main objectives of the experiment were to study the effects of periodic excitation on airfoil drag-divergence and to alleviate the severe unsteadiness associated with shock-induced separation (known as "buffeting"). Zero-mass-flux oscillatory blowing was introduced through a downstream directed slot located at 10% chord on the upper surface of the NACA 0015 airfoil. The effective frequencies generated 2-4 vortices over the separated region, regardless of the Mach number. Even though the excitation was introduced upstream of the shock-wave, due to experimental limitations, it had pronounced effects downstream of it. Wake deficit (associated with drag) and unsteadiness (associated with buffeting) were significantly reduced. The spectral content of the wake pressure fluctuations indicates of steadier flow throughout the frequency range when excitation was applied. This is especially important at low frequencies which are more likely to interact with the airframe.

[1]  D. A. Dress,et al.  Operating envelope charts for the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic wind tunnel , 1986 .

[2]  Edward J. Ray,et al.  Evolution, calibration, and operational characteristics of the two-dimensional test section of the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel , 1987 .

[3]  Paul K. Chang,et al.  Separation of flow , 1961 .

[4]  Jiezhi Wu,et al.  Post-stall flow control on an airfoil by local unsteady forcing , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  I. Wygnanski,et al.  Delay of Airfoil Stall by Periodic Excitation , 1996 .

[6]  C. L. Ladson,et al.  High Reynolds number transonic tests on a NACA 0012 airfoil in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel , 1987 .

[7]  W J McCroskey,et al.  A critical assessment of wind tunnel results for the NACA 0012 airfoil , 1987 .

[8]  L. D. Krai,et al.  ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL APPLIED TO AN AIRFOIL , 1998 .

[9]  Jean Delery,et al.  Shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction and its control , 1985 .

[10]  A. Seifert,et al.  Oscillatory Control of Separation at High Reynolds Numbers , 1999 .

[11]  G. E. A. Meier,et al.  Forced oscillations of airfoil flows , 1996 .

[12]  E. Stanewsky,et al.  Effects of local boundary layer suction on shock-boundary layer interaction and shock-induced separation , 1984 .

[13]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Separation control - Review , 1991 .

[14]  Raymond C. Montgomery,et al.  Subsonic maneuvering effectiveness of high-performance aircraft that employ quasi-static shape change devices , 1998, Smart Structures.

[15]  T. Barber,et al.  Numerical analysis of shock-induced separation alleviation using vortex generators , 1992 .

[16]  I. Wygnanski,et al.  Oscillatory Blowing: A Tool to Delay Boundary-Layer Separation , 1993 .