Visuo-spatial working memory in navigation

Two experiments employed dual task techniques to explore the role of working memory in route learning and subsequent route retrieval. Experiment 1 involved contrasting performance of two groups of volunteers respectively learning a route from a series of map segments or a series of visually presented nonsense words. Both groups performed learning and recognition under articulatory suppression or concurrent spatial tapping. Both concurrent tasks had an overall disruptive effect on each learning task. However, spatial tapping disrupted route recognition rather more than did articulatory suppression, while the nonsense word recognition was impaired more by articulatory suppression than by concurrent spatial tapping. Experiment 2 again used dual task methodology, but explored route learning by asking volunteers to follow the experimenter through the winding streets of a medieval European town centre. Retrieval involved following the same route while the experimenter followed and noted errors in navigation. Overall the results partially replicated those of Experiment 1 in that both concurrent tasks interfered with route learning. However, volunteers with high spatial ability appeared more affected by the concurrent spatial tapping task, whereas low spatial subjects appeared more affected by the concurrent articulatory suppression task. Results are interpreted to suggest that different aspects of working memory are involved in learning a route from a map with a greater emphasis on visuo-spatial resources, but in tasks set in real environments where many cues of a varied nature are available, only high spatial ability subjects appear to rely heavily upon the visuospatial component of working memory. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Language: en

[1]  T. Gärling,et al.  Acquisition of locational information about reference points during locomotion with and without a concurrent task: effects of number of reference points. , 1981, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[2]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  E. Lindberg,et al.  Cognitive Mapping of Large-Scale Environments , 1984 .

[4]  E. Farmer,et al.  Evidence for a Visuo-Spatial Scratch-Pad in Working Memory , 1986 .

[5]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Face recognition, pose and ecological validity. , 1987 .

[6]  Eric J. Vanetti,et al.  Communicating Environmental Knowledge , 1988 .

[7]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning☆ , 1991 .

[8]  M M Smyth,et al.  Interference in immediate spatial memory , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Lo sviluppo della memoria di lavoro visuospaziale e il suo ruolo nella memoria spaziale , 1995 .

[10]  A. Devlin,et al.  Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women , 1995 .

[11]  C. Lawton,et al.  Individual- and Gender-Related Differences in Indoor Wayfinding , 1996 .

[12]  M. Smyth,et al.  Movement imagery in rock climbing: patterns of interference from visual, spatial and kinaesthetic secondary tasks , 1998 .

[13]  R. Logie,et al.  Dissociation between recency and span: neuropsychological and experimental evidence. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[14]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  The role of distinct components of visuo-spatial working memory in the processing of texts. , 1999, Memory.

[15]  M. Denis,et al.  Spatial discourse and navigation: an analysis of route directions in the city of Venice , 1999 .

[16]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory: The multiple-component model , 1999 .