Promiscuity in ligand-binding: The three-dimensional structure of a Piromyces carbohydrate-binding module, CBM29-2, in complex with cello- and mannohexaose

Carbohydrate–protein recognition is central to many biological processes. Enzymes that act on polysaccharide substrates frequently contain noncatalytic domains, “carbohydrate-binding modules” (CBMs), that target the enzyme to the appropriate substrate. CBMs that recognize specific plant structural polysaccharides are often able to accommodate both the variable backbone and the side-chain decorations of heterogeneous ligands. “CBM29” modules, derived from a noncatalytic component of the Piromyces equi cellulase/hemicellulase complex, provide an example of this selective yet flexible recognition. They discriminate strongly against some polysaccharides while remaining relatively promiscuous toward both β-1,4-linked manno- and cello-oligosaccharides. This feature may reflect preferential, but flexible, targeting toward glucomannans in the plant cell wall. The three-dimensional structure of CBM29-2 and its complexes with cello- and mannohexaose reveal a β-jelly-roll topology, with an extended binding groove on the concave surface. The orientation of the aromatic residues complements the conformation of the target sugar polymer while accommodation of both manno- and gluco-configured oligo- and polysaccharides is conferred by virtue of the plasticity of the direct interactions from their axial and equatorial 2-hydroxyls, respectively. Such flexible ligand recognition targets the anaerobic fungal complex to a range of different components in the plant cell wall and thus plays a pivotal role in the highly efficient degradation of this composite structure by the microbial eukaryote.

[1]  G. Xue,et al.  Homologous catalytic domains in a rumen fungal xylanase: evidence for gene duplication and prokaryotic origin , 1992, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  K. Waldron,et al.  Physiology and Biochemistry of Plant Cell Walls , 1990, Topics in Plant Physiology.

[3]  G J Davies,et al.  The X6 "thermostabilizing" domains of xylanases are carbohydrate-binding modules: structure and biochemistry of the Clostridium thermocellum X6b domain. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[4]  D. Bolam,et al.  A Novel Carbohydrate-binding Protein Is a Component of the Plant Cell Wall-degrading Complex of Piromyces equi * , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  Jorge Navaza,et al.  [33] AMoRe: An automated molecular replacement program package. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[6]  H. Gilbert,et al.  The Conserved Noncatalytic 40-Residue Sequence in Cellulases and Hemicellulases from Anaerobic Fungi Functions as a Protein Docking Domain (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[8]  P. Simpson,et al.  The type II and X cellulose-binding domains of Pseudomonas xylanase A potentiate catalytic activity against complex substrates by a common mechanism. , 1999, The Biochemical journal.

[9]  C. Sander,et al.  Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  J H Lakey,et al.  Role of hydrogen bonding in the interaction between a xylan binding module and xylan. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[11]  Didier Nurizzo,et al.  Differential Oligosaccharide Recognition by Evolutionarily-related β-1,4 and β-1,3 Glucan-binding Modules , 2002 .

[12]  P. Kraulis A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[13]  V S Lamzin,et al.  Automated refinement of protein models. , 1993, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[14]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[15]  B. Henrissat,et al.  The Location of the Ligand-binding Site of Carbohydrate-binding Modules That Have Evolved from a Common Sequence Is Not Conserved* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  L. McIntosh,et al.  Structure and binding specificity of the second N-terminal cellulose-binding domain from Cellulomonas fimi endoglucanase C. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[17]  J F Brandts,et al.  Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[18]  A Bairoch,et al.  Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl hydrolases. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[19]  Thomas C. Terwilliger,et al.  Automated MAD and MIR structure solution , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[20]  T. Steitz,et al.  Crystal structure of a bacterial family‐III cellulose‐binding domain: a general mechanism for attachment to cellulose. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[21]  H. Sugiyama,et al.  A study of the conformation of β-1,4-linked glucose oligomers, cellobiose to cellohexaose, in solution , 2000 .

[22]  K D Cowtan,et al.  Improvement of macromolecular electron-density maps by the simultaneous application of real and reciprocal space constraints. , 1993, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[23]  Andrzej M. Brzozowski,et al.  Clear strategy screens for macromolecular crystallization , 2001 .

[24]  D. Bolam,et al.  Structure of a Family 15 Carbohydrate-binding Module in Complex with Xylopentaose , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[26]  D. Kilburn,et al.  Recognition of cello-oligosaccharides by a family 17 carbohydrate-binding module: an X-ray crystallographic, thermodynamic and mutagenic study. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.