Technology adoption as process: A case of integrating an information-intensive website into a patient education helpline

This study followed the introduction of the Arthritis Source website into the existing teaching practices of Arthritis Foundation Helpline volunteers. The goal was to examine what factors may affect a particular group of educators adopt a potentially valuable Internet tool into an existing instructional environment. Defining the possible uses of the website in reference to the volunteers' actual job duties helped provide a clearer understanding of how the volunteers might use this new technology. The researchers used qualitative techniques to focus on three volunteers who experienced different physical, environmental and cognitive means that impacted their use of the new tool. Each volunteer experienced varying levels of motivation in areas of learning, satisfaction and responses to outside influences. Each volunteer also had varying amounts of opportunity prompts in which to interact or refer the website. Consequently, Helpline volunteers experienced different rates of adopting the information-intensive website into their traditional work system.

[1]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Sociotechnical issues in the implementation of imaging technology , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  R Maisiak,et al.  Users of a public arthritis information service and their needs. , 1989, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Evaluating information and communication technologies for learning , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[4]  R. Pea.  Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education , 1993 .

[5]  R. Nata.  Progress in Education , 1940, Nature.

[6]  Les Gasser,et al.  The integration of computing and routine work , 1986, TOIS.

[7]  Paul Dourish,et al.  On "Technomethodology": Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Said S. Al-Gahtani,et al.  Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Reed Stevens,et al.  Divisions of Labor in School and in the Workplace: Comparing Computer and Paper-Supported Activities Across Settings , 2000 .

[10]  C. Heath,et al.  Technology in Action: ‘Interaction’ with computers in architecture , 2000 .

[11]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[12]  Larry Cuban.  Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[13]  J. Baher,et al.  Using case studies to evaluate learning technologies , 1999, FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011.

[14]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Katarina Paulsson,et al.  Learning at work - a combination of experience based learning and theoretical education , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Located Accountabilities in Technology Production , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Articulating collaboration in a learning community , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[19]  Charles E. Hughes,et al.  The virtual academy: A simulated environment for constructionist learning , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Phillip W. Payton.  Influences of the 'social contract', technology and restructuring, and training on the supply and demand for skilled technology workers , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Eszter Láng,et al.  Heart period variability as mental effort monitor in Human Computer Interaction , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Marcus W. Jernegan,et al.  The Progress of Education , 1921, The School Review.

[23]  D. Reamon,et al.  Assessment of technology-assisted learning in higher education: it requires new thinking by universities and colleges , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[24]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Barriers, Incentives and Facilitators for Adoption of Universal Design Practices by Consumer Product Manufacturers , 1998 .

[25]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Modelling cyclic interaction , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Paul Brna,et al.  Classroom Conundrums: The Use of a Participant Design Methodology , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[27]  H. Becker,et al.  Participant Observation and Interviewing: A Comparison , 1957 .

[28]  Martin Oliver,et al.  An introduction to the Evaluation of Learning Technology , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[29]  Harriet G. Taylor.  Foundations for Restructuring through Standards for Information Technology Teacher Preparation Programmes: National Policy Initiatives in the United States , 1993, Informatics and Changes in Learning.

[30]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive artifacts , 1991 .

[31]  Frank Andries,et al.  Positive and negative aspects of the work of information technology personnel: An exploratory analysis , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[32]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Teaching human- computer interaction in context: An illustrative lesson on windows , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Sharing engineering design knowledge in a distributed environment , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[34]  Janine Onffroy Shelley.  Factors that Affect the Adoption and Use of Electronic Mail by K-12 Foreign Language Educators , 1998 .

[35]  Barry A. T. Brown.  The artful use of groupware: An ethnographic study of how Lotus Notes is used in practice , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..