The effects of risk probability, outcome severity, efficacy of protection and access to protection on decision making: A further test of protection motivation theory

The effects of different types of risk information in a simulated decision-making task were investigated to test the predictions of protection motivation theory. In accordance with predictions, outcome severity, efficacy of protection, and access to protection were related to protective decisions. The results are discussed in terms of general utility of this model for a variety of decision-making situations. The aspect of manageability, which is seen as a combination of efficacy of protection and access to protection, was discussed as an essential component for risk decision making.

[1]  Kenneth H. Beck,et al.  The Effects of Health Threat Seriousness and Personal Efficacy upon Intentions and Behavior1 , 1981 .

[2]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[3]  A. Frankel,et al.  A conceptualization of threat communications and protective health behavior. , 1981, Social psychology quarterly.

[4]  R. Rogers.  Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of prote , 1983 .

[5]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective☆ , 1978 .

[6]  K. Higbee,et al.  Fifteen years of fear arousal: research on threat appeals: 1953-1968. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Ronald W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of threatening and reassuring components of fear appeals on physiological and verbal measures of emotion and attitudes , 1979 .

[8]  D. Thistlethwaite,et al.  Effects of fear arousal andreassurance on attitude change. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Risks of road transportation in a psychological perspective , 1978 .

[10]  R W Rogers,et al.  Identifying effective components of alcohol misuse prevention programs. , 1982, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[11]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The psychology of protective behavior , 1978 .

[12]  Mary Lou Shelton,et al.  Fear‐Arousing and Empathy‐Arousing Appeals to Help: The Pathos of Persuasion , 1981 .

[13]  Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of coping responses. , 1976 .

[14]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change , 1983 .

[15]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk , 1982 .

[16]  A K Lund,et al.  Children's health beliefs and acceptance of a dental preventive activity. , 1980, Journal of health and social behavior.

[17]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[18]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.