Improvements and Performance of Diagnostic Compositional Imaging Using a Novel Dual-Energy X-ray Technique

Determine whether or not improvements to the calibration procedure for a novel dual-energy x-ray mammography technique improve the uniformity, accuracy, and/or reproducibility of the measured breast composition. The long-term goal of this project is to develop a technique that will improve the specificity of mammography diagnosis. Energy dependent corrections for light-field, dark-field, and Heel effect were made for each measurement. A total of 20 women who were scheduled for additional imaging prior to biopsy underwent an additional dual-energy/low dose full-field digital mammography scan as part of a pilot study investigating the use of breast composition measures in mammography. The estimated water/lipid/protein content of suspicious lesions were measured. The modified x-ray calibration procedure resulted in over a 3-fold improvement in the uniformity of a flat-field calibration phantom with known breast density. Some preliminary results from women are available and show that different types of breast lesions have different compositions.

[1]  Z M Wang,et al.  Systematic organization of body-composition methodology: an overview with emphasis on component-based methods. , 1995, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[2]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Corinne Balleyguier,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography , 2006 .

[4]  A Pietrobelli,et al.  Weight loss increases and fat loss decreases all-cause mortality rate: results from two independent cohort studies , 1999, International Journal of Obesity.

[5]  M. Schemper,et al.  A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  Chemical and elemental analysis of humans in vivo using improved body composition models. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2006 , 2006, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[8]  M M Mishkin,et al.  Contrast media safety: what do we know and how do we know it? , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  Gordon E. Mawdsley,et al.  An optical method for measuring compressed breast thickness , 2003 .

[11]  G. Michael,et al.  Monte Carlo modelling of an extended DXA technique. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Serghei Malkov,et al.  Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Method Using a Full Field Digital Mammography System , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.