DRR technology sharing and transfer through web-based platforms: Lessons learned from Korean studies

Purpose – Disaster risk reduction (DRR) technology sharing has emerged as an important global issue across national boundaries. As a result, the DRR technology-sharing environment needs strengthening based on the findings of difficulties in sharing, investment, and commitment. The purpose of this paper is to three fold: first, it will clarify that a web-based platform is the best conduit for linking DRR technology from the supplier to the beneficiary developing countries. Second, it will find the most evolutionary path based on Korean case studies. Finally, it will make recommendations for the efficient implementation of a web-based platform for DRR technology sharing. Design/methodology/approach – This paper posits that DRR technology sharing is a necessary part of enhancing resilience to disasters in the Asia-Pacific region. The evolution of web-based approaches (a merchandise display-type platform, a journal-type platform, an electronic market-type platform, and an architecture and governance-type plat...

[1]  Andy Walker,et al.  Technology Transfer: Strategy, Management, Process And Inhibiting Factors. A Study Relating To The Technology Transfer Of Intelligent Systems , 2000 .

[2]  A. Gawer Platforms, Markets and Innovation , 2011 .

[3]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[4]  Gary T. Mitchum,et al.  Estimating Mean Sea Level Change from the TOPEX and Jason Altimeter Missions , 2010 .

[5]  The influence of public dispute on trade/investment disputes: Case of SsangYong Motors , 2012 .

[6]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[7]  C. Shum,et al.  Elevation changes of bering glacier system, Alaska, from 1992 to 2010, observed by satellite radar altimetry , 2013 .

[8]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[9]  A. Cazenave,et al.  Preliminary results of ENVISAT RA-2-derived water levels validation over the Amazon basin , 2006 .

[10]  Raj Prasanna,et al.  Factors affecting the acceptance of information systems supporting emergency operations centres , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  David B. Montgomery,et al.  Resource commitment, entry timing, and market performance of foreign direct investments in emerging economies: The case of Japanese international joint ventures in China , 2000 .

[12]  Anders Wall,et al.  Technology transfer: why some succeed and some don't , 2006, TT '06.

[13]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions , 1986 .

[14]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[15]  Jonathan D Hagood Why Does Technology Transfer Fail? Two Technology Transfer Projects from Peronist Argentina , 2006 .

[16]  M. Casson,et al.  The future of the multinational enterprise , 1977 .

[17]  C. Kirschner,et al.  Budgeting for disasters: Focusing on the good times , 2010 .

[18]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .