An Evaluation of the Double Torsion Technique

Double Torsion (DT) is a powerful testing technique for fracture mechanics characterisation of brittle materials as, in principle, it provides a crack length independent test configuration. However, several corrections have been proposed to address variations of experimental results reported from various laboratories. These correction factors address the validity of the DT configuration and its crack length independent stress intensity. Never the less, there seems to be no consensus in literature on the various corrections and the reason of reported variations. This paper presents firstly a critical review of the DT technique, followed by proposed corrections through an experimental analysis using the proposed corrections, a Finite Element model of the geometry and the use of Digital Image Correlation to measure out-of-plane surface deformations. It focuses on the validity of the constant stress intensity regime and the independence of crack length in a critical evaluation using Polymethylmethacrylate test specimens. Assessment of three un-grooved specimen geometry configurations demonstrated the apparent regime of approximately constant stress intensity, although a small but clear dependence of the stress intensity on crack length was observed in all specimen configurations. This dependence is attributable to significant load-point deflections and out-of plane deformations that are not accounted for in the DT analysis. Revisions of the proposed analysis methodologies show that a crack length independent specimen geometry can be achieved, however at the cost of less accurate data. Reliable and accurate data can be achieved with a DT testing configuration using an optimum specimen configuration.

[1]  D. Hasselman,et al.  Effect of Crystallites on Subcritical Crack Growth and Strain‐Rate Sensitivity of Strength of Cordierite Glass‐Ceramics , 1985 .

[2]  M. Swain,et al.  Mechanical property characterization of a number of polymers using uniaxial compression and spherical tipped indentation tests , 1997 .

[3]  P. Leevers Crack-front shape effects in the double torsion test , 1982 .

[4]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the double torsion analysis on soda-lime glass , 2007 .

[5]  O. Sano A revision of the double-torsion technique for brittle materials , 1988 .

[6]  I. Sinclair,et al.  Analytical and finite element modelling of roughness induced crack closure , 2004 .

[7]  P. Withers,et al.  Full‐field strain mapping by optical correlation of micrographs acquired during deformation , 2005, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  A. Needleman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING ENERGY RELEASE RATES , 1985 .

[9]  B. J. Pletka,et al.  A comparison of failure predictions by strength and fracture mechanics techniques , 1982 .

[10]  R. Ritchie,et al.  A geometric model for fatigue crack closure induced by fracture surface roughness , 1982 .

[11]  J. Outwater,et al.  On the Fracture Energy, Rehealing Velocity and Refracture Energy of Cast Epoxy Resin , 1969 .

[12]  S. P. McKenna,et al.  Performance of digital image velocimetry processing techniques , 2002 .

[13]  R. Tait,et al.  In situ double torsion fracture studies of cement mortar and cement paste inside a scanning electron microscope , 1986 .

[14]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Double-torsion testing a 3Y-TZP ceramic , 1996 .

[15]  E. Fuller An Evaluation of Double-Torsion Testing—Analysis , 1979 .

[16]  E. Lara-Curzio,et al.  The double-torsion testing technique for determination of fracture toughness and slow crack growth behavior of materials: A review , 2006 .

[17]  M. K. Ferber,et al.  Subcritical Crack Growth in Dense Alumina Exposed to Physiological Media , 1980 .

[18]  R. B. Tait,et al.  Damage, Crack Growth and Fracture Characteristics of Nuclear Grade Graphite using the Double Torsion Technique , 2011 .

[19]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Slow crack-growth behavior of alumina ceramics , 2000 .

[20]  M. Ashby,et al.  R-curve behaviour of Al2O3 ceramics , 1990 .

[21]  Yuh J. Chao,et al.  Advances in Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Computer Vision , 2000 .

[22]  M. Ciccotti Realistic Finite‐Element Model for the Double‐Torsion Loading Configuration , 2004 .

[23]  R. Truss,et al.  A modified double-torsion method for measuring the fracture toughness of polymeric ophthalmic lenses , 1994 .

[24]  S. Burns,et al.  Crack‐Velocity Correction Factor for the Crack‐Front Shape in Double Torsion Specimens , 1979 .

[25]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  A method for evaluating the time-dependent failure characteristics of brittle materials — and its application to polycrystalline alumina , 1972 .

[26]  A. Evans,et al.  A simple method for studying slow crack growth. , 1973 .

[27]  H. Kausch,et al.  Some geometrical observations on crack front profiles in PMMA double torsion specimens , 1982 .

[28]  G. G. Trantina Stress Analysis of the Double‐Torsion Specimen , 1977 .

[29]  Matteo Ciccotti,et al.  The double torsion loading configuration for fracture propagation: an improved methodology for the load-relaxation at constant displacement , 2000 .

[30]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method , 1983, Image Vis. Comput..

[31]  F. Mulargia,et al.  Practical application of an improved methodology for the double torsion load relaxation method , 2001 .

[32]  B. Karlsson,et al.  The influence of grain size and fracture surface geometry on the near-threshold fatigue crack growth in ferritic steels , 1988 .

[33]  I. Ward,et al.  A double-torsion study of the fracture of polyethersulphone , 1984 .

[34]  E. Lara‐Curzio,et al.  Fracture Toughness of Thin Plates by the Double‐Torsion Test Method , 2008 .

[35]  J. Rodrigues,et al.  Characteristics of the double-torsion test to determine the R-curve of ceramic materials , 2006 .

[36]  R. Tait,et al.  Review and evaluation of the double-torsion technique for fracture toughness and fatigue testing of brittle materials , 1987 .