Terrain-based simulation of IEEE 802.11a and b physical layers on the martian surface

This paper presents results concerning the use of IEEE 802.11 a and b wireless local area network (WLAN) standards for proximity wireless networks on the Martian surface. The RF environment on the Martian surface is modeled using high-resolution digital elevation maps (DEMs) of Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum (Hematite) as sample sites. The resulting propagation path loss models are then used in a physical layer (PHY) simulation. Our results show that Martian terrain as represented by the sites studied, can create multipath conditions which in turn affect 802.11 a and b PHY performance. However, with a few tens of milliwatts of radiated power and antenna heights within 1-2 m, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)-based 802.11 a can have very good PHY performance in terms of bit error rate (BER) and packet error rate (PER) for distances up to a few hundred meters; 802.11 b, which is based on direct-sequence spread spectrum (DSSS), is found to be much more adversely affected in the multipath environment. The DEM-based simulation methodology presented here may be more useful to mission planners than generic statistical models.

[1]  W. A. Kissick,et al.  A Guide to the Use of the ITS Irregular Terrain Model in the Area Prediction Mode , 1982 .

[2]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[3]  William M. Farrell,et al.  Radio atmospheric propagation on Mars and potential remote sensing applications , 1999 .

[4]  David Bull,et al.  A comparison of HIPERLAN/2 and IEEE 802.11a physical and MAC layers , 2000, IEEE Benelux Chapter on Vehicular Technology and Communications. Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology. SCVT-2000. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX465).

[5]  R. J. Cesarone,et al.  Frequency bands for Mars in-situ communications , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[6]  M. Sue,et al.  Mars Background Noise Temperatures Received by Spacecraft Antennas , 2002 .

[7]  Xiongwen Zhao,et al.  Propagation characteristics for wideband outdoor mobile communications at 5.3 GHz , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[8]  Kin K. Leung,et al.  Outdoor IEEE 802.11 cellular networks: radio link performance , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[9]  Andrew R Nix,et al.  A comparison of the HIPERLAN/2 and IEEE 802.11a wireless LAN standards , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[10]  David R. Bull,et al.  An evaluation of the performance of IEEE 802.11a and 802.11g wireless local area networks in a corporate office environment , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[11]  A. F. C. Haldemann,et al.  Analysis of MOLA data for the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites , 2003 .

[12]  Athina P. Petropulu,et al.  Analysis of physical layer performance of IEEE 802.11A in an ad-hoc network environment , 2003, IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2003. MILCOM 2003..

[13]  R. Kirk,et al.  High-resolution topomapping of candidate MER landing sites with Mars Orbiter Camera narrow-angle images , 2003 .

[14]  Zhenyu Wang,et al.  Statistical peer-to-peer channel models for outdoor urban environments at 2 GHz and 5 GHz , 2004, IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004.

[15]  Vishwanath Chukkala,et al.  Modeling the radio frequency environment of Mars for future wireless, networked rovers and sensor Webs , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[16]  G.R. Lovelace,et al.  Performance evaluation of the IEEE 802.11a and b WLAN physical layer on the Martian surface , 2005, 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference.