Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Tools in Science Education: An Emerging Pedagogical Framework for Classroom Practice.

Researchers and practitioners have attempted to identify technologies that support students' scientific understanding, activities and support practices that facilitate students' inquiry processes, and methods to sustain technology-enhanced innovations in everyday science classrooms. The purpose of this paper is to examine the findings and implications of research on science inquiry tools on classroom teaching and learning practices. We summarize research on inquiry tools and present a framework for teaching and learning in technology-enhanced, inquiry-based science classes. In the framework, three dimensions are discussed: the macrocontext (systemic reform and educational standards), the teachers' community (physical or virtual context, where teachers share expertise and mentor each other), and the microcontext (classroom context, where learning and teaching occur). From this pedagogical framework, the interactions among the standards, teachers' community, and classroom contexts are key to exploring the role of technologies. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed, 91:1010–1030, 2007

[1]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students , 1998 .

[2]  Raven Wallace,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Teaching With the Internet , 2004 .

[3]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings , 2006 .

[4]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .

[5]  E. Glasersfeld.  Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching , 1989 .

[6]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[7]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  What Does It Mean To Create Sustainable Science Curriculum Innovations? A Commentary. , 2003 .

[8]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[9]  Wan Ng,et al.  Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of the World Wide Web as a Research and Teaching Tool in Science Learning , 2002 .

[10]  Gary Benenson,et al.  The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for learning , 2001 .

[11]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences , 2003 .

[12]  Cathleen Norris,et al.  The Viable Alternative: Handhelds. , 2003 .

[13]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Grounded constructions and how technology can help , 1998 .

[14]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning , 2001 .

[15]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations , 2004 .

[16]  Karla Krueger,et al.  InTime Impact Report What was InTime's Effectiveness and Impact on Faculty and Preservice Teachers? , 2004 .

[17]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Preparing Tomorrow's Science Teachers to Use Technology: Guidelines for Science Educators , 2000 .

[18]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[19]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge , 2001 .

[20]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Facilitating Students’ Inquiry Learning and Metacognitive Development Through Modifiable Software Advisers , 2000 .

[21]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio , 2003 .

[22]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Authentic inquiry: Introduction to the special section , 2002 .

[23]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Visualization and Representation of Physical Systems: Wavemaker as an Aid to Conceptualizing Wave Phenomena , 1999 .

[24]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Becoming-in-the-classroom: a case study of teacher development through coteaching , 1999 .

[25]  S. Barab,et al.  Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation , 2003 .

[26]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN LEARNING TO TEACH ELEMENTARY SCIENCE , 1999 .

[27]  John Wallace,et al.  Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science , 2005 .

[28]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  The ideal of Standards and the reality of schools : Needed research , 2001 .

[29]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Enacting Reform-Based Science Materials: The Range of Teacher Enactments in Reform Classrooms , 2005 .

[30]  M. Volman,et al.  The Web as an Information Resource in K–12 Education: Strategies for Supporting Students in Searching and Processing Information , 2005 .

[31]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[32]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[33]  Sandra K. Abell,et al.  The Challenges of Teaching Physics to Preservice Elementary Teachers: Orientations of the Professor, Teaching Assistant, and Students , 2005 .

[34]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[35]  Kevin Oliver,et al.  Developing and refining mental models in open-ended learning environments: A case study , 2001 .

[36]  Susan J. Doubler,et al.  Can teachers learn through enquiry on‐line? Studying professional development in science delivered on‐line and on‐campus , 2004 .

[37]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[38]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .

[39]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Technology-Rich Inquiry Science in Urban Classrooms: What are the Barriers to Inquiry Pedagogy? , 2002 .

[40]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Coordination in Coteaching: Producing Alignment in Real Time , 2005 .

[41]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard , 2003 .

[42]  John Settlage,et al.  Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools , 2002 .

[43]  Mark Windschitl.  Guest editorial: The future of science teacher preparation in America: Where is the evidence to inform program design and guide responsible policy decisions? , 2005 .

[44]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[45]  Erminia Pedretti,et al.  Technology, Text, and Talk: Students' Perspectives on Teaching and Learning in a Technology-Enhanced Secondary Science Classroom. , 1998 .

[46]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice , 1990 .

[47]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends , 2003 .

[48]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  Editorial: Celebrating 90 years of Science Education: Reflections on the gold standard and ways of promoting good research , 2006 .

[49]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  WISE Inquiry in Fifth Grade Biology , 2002 .

[50]  D. Perkins,et al.  Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies , 1991 .

[51]  Chester E. Finn,et al.  Removing the Barriers for Teacher Candidates. , 2001 .

[52]  Hyeonjin Kim,et al.  Grounded design of web-enhanced case-based activity , 2008 .

[53]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[54]  Jim Garrison,et al.  Cases as Shared Inquiry: A Dialogical Model of Teacher Preparation , 1992 .

[55]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Patterns of understanding with open-ended learning environments: A qualitative study , 1997 .

[56]  Minchi Kim,et al.  Designing Online Learning Environments to Support Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[57]  Charles R. Coble,et al.  Teachers Designing Curriculum as Professional Development: A Model for Transformational Science Teaching. , 1997 .

[58]  Feng Wang,et al.  Cognitive tools and student‐centred learning: rethinking tools, functions and applications , 2005 .

[59]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? , 2003 .

[60]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Information Technology and Education: Computer Criticism vs. Technocentric Thinking , 1987 .

[61]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community , 1998 .

[62]  B. Crawford.  Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers , 2000 .

[63]  Steven J. Stratford.  A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms , 1997 .

[64]  Mary M. Atwater,et al.  Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs , 2002 .

[65]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[66]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  Nestedness of Beliefs: Examining a Prospective Elementary Teacher's Belief System about Science Teaching and Learning. , 2003 .

[67]  J. Dewey.  Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[68]  Barbara A. Crawford,et al.  Supporting prospective teachers' conceptions of modelling in science , 2004 .

[69]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[70]  R. Wallace.  The Internet as a Site for Changing Practice: The Case of Ms. Owens , 2002 .

[71]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  WISE design for knowledge integration , 2003 .

[72]  Carolyn W. Keys,et al.  Co-Constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. , 2001 .

[73]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Setting the Stage for Developing Pre‐service Teachers’ Conceptions of Good Science Teaching: The role of classroom videos , 2006 .

[74]  Allen Munro,et al.  Productivity tools for simulation-centered training development , 1992 .

[75]  Brett D. Jones,et al.  Safe Passages , 2003 .

[76]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  Challenges of standards‐based reform: The example of California's science content standards and textbook adoption process , 2003 .

[77]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[78]  J. Bruner.  The Process of Education , 1960 .

[79]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Professional Development in Inquiry-Based Science for Elementary Teachers of Diverse Student Groups. , 2004 .

[80]  K. Tobin,et al.  Relationships between metaphors, beliefs, and actions in a context of science curriculum change , 1995 .

[81]  Julie A. Luft,et al.  Teachers' salient beliefs about a problem-solving demonstration classroom in-service program , 1999 .

[82]  K. Chan,et al.  Relational Analysis of Personal Epistemology and Conceptions about Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[83]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Virtual Solar System Project: Learning Through a Technology-Rich, Inquiry-Based, Participatory Learning Environment , 2000 .

[84]  R. Voithofer.  Designing New Media Education Research: The Materiality of Data, Representation, and Dissemination , 2005 .

[85]  Sharon J. Lynch.  Novice teachers' encounter with national science education reform: Entanglements or intelligent interconnections? , 1997 .

[86]  J. Nespor.  The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching. , 1987 .

[87]  Valerie K. Otero,et al.  Integrating Technology into Teacher Education , 2005 .

[88]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Beyond Amplification: Using the Computer To Reorganize Mental Functioning. Technical Report No. 38. , 1985 .

[89]  N. Songer,et al.  Student Motivation and Internet Technology: Are Students Empowered to Learn Science? , 2000 .

[90]  Thomas W. Shiland.  The atheoretical nature of the national science education standards , 1998 .

[91]  D. Suthers,et al.  “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry , 2002 .

[92]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Learning-for-use : A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities , 2001 .

[93]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The Nature of Middle School Learners' Science Content Understandings with the Use of On-line Resources , 2003 .

[94]  Ronald D. Anderson.  Curriculum Reform Dilemmas and Promise , 1995 .

[95]  Alberto J. Rodriguez.  The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's national science education standards , 1997 .

[96]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[97]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[98]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Science on the Web: Students Online in a Sixth-Grade Classroom , 2000 .