Acoustic cues in production and perception of the four-way stop laryngeal contrast in Hindi and Urdu

Abstract This work examines cue weighting in production and perception of the four-way laryngeal contrast in Hindi and Urdu. Previous work has consistently identified several cues, including prevoicing (duration), aspiration (duration), voice quality, and f0, that are relevant to the contrast, although the phonetic specification of the contrast, and particularly the status of the so-called “voiced aspirates,” remains unclear. In this work, we confirm the importance of prevoicing and aspiration to the contrast overall, but argue that voice quality (murmur or breathy voice) best distinguishes the voiced aspirates in production. In perception, listeners make use of all cues, in line with production patterns. Tokens in which concurrent prevoicing and aspiration are categorically identified as voiced aspirates, indicating that the joint presence of these two cues is sufficient for voiced stop identification and demonstrating the primacy of these features over all of the others tested. At the same time, neither prevoicing nor aspiration is strictly necessary for voiced aspirate identification; a stop token be perceived as a voiced aspirate even when one of these is absent, as long as the breathy voice quality also characteristic of voiced aspirates is present. We attribute the disproportionately large perceptual category space for voiced aspirates to the variability of voiced aspirates in production.

[1]  Morgan Sonderegger,et al.  Realization and representation of Nepali laryngeal contrasts: Voiced aspirates and laryngeal realism , 2019, J. Phonetics.

[2]  J. Gray,et al.  PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.

[3]  Olga Dmitrieva,et al.  Acoustic Correlates of the Four-Way Laryngeal Contrast in Marathi , 2019, Phonetica.

[4]  Patricia A. Keating,et al.  Voicesauce: A Program for Voice Analysis , 2009, ICPhS.

[5]  Sameer ud Dowla Khan,et al.  The phonetics of contrastive phonation in Gujarati , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[6]  Katsumasa Shimizu,et al.  Cross-language study of voicing contrasts of stop consonants in Asian languages , 1990 .

[7]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones , 1989, Speech Commun..

[8]  Kelly Harper Berkson,et al.  Acoustic correlates of breathy sonorants in Marathi , 2019, J. Phonetics.

[9]  D. Whalen,et al.  The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels , 1995 .

[10]  L. Schiefer F₀ in the Production and Perception of Breathy Stops: Evidence from Hindi , 1986 .

[11]  A. Benguerel,et al.  Hindi Stop Consonants: an Acoustic and Fiberscopic Study , 1980, Phonetica.

[12]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  Effects of Place of Articulation and Vowel Context on VOT Production and Perception for French and English Stops , 1994, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[13]  Anna Esposito,et al.  On Vowel Height and Consonantal Voicing Effects: Data from Italian , 2002, Phonetica.

[14]  Sameer ud Dowla Khan,et al.  Contrastive breathiness across consonants and vowels: A comparative study of Gujarati and White Hmong , 2012, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[15]  Indranil Dutta,et al.  Four -way stop contrasts in Hindi: An acoustic study of voicing, fundamental frequency and spectral tilt , 2007 .

[16]  C. Mateer,et al.  A Study of VOT in Nepali Stop Consonants , 1985 .

[17]  Henning Reetz,et al.  Caught in the ACT: The Timing of Aspiration and Voicing in East Bengali , 2007, Language and speech.

[18]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Phonation types: a cross-linguistic overview , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[19]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[20]  S S Agrawal,et al.  Significant features in the perception of (Hindi) consonants. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Christina M. Esposito,et al.  Distinguishing breathy consonants and vowels in Gujarati , 2019 .

[22]  Qandeel Hussain,et al.  A typological study of Voice Onset Time (VOT) in Indo-Iranian languages , 2018, J. Phonetics.

[23]  Jessamyn Schertz,et al.  Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production. , 2020, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[24]  Christina M. Esposito The effects of linguistic experience on the perception of phonation , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[25]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Voice onset time and beyond: Exploring laryngeal contrast in 19 languages , 2019, J. Phonetics.

[26]  D. Klatt Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  Katharine Davis,et al.  Stop Voicing in Hindi , 1994 .

[28]  Aletheia Cui,et al.  Relative cue weighting in production and perception of an ongoing sound change in Southern Yi , 2018, J. Phonetics.

[29]  Jiseung Kim,et al.  Prosodic-structural modulation of stop voicing contrast along the VOT continuum in trochaic and iambic words in American English , 2018, J. Phonetics.

[30]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[31]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[32]  James P. Kirby,et al.  Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel F0: Evidence from "true voicing" languages. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Perceptual Assessment of Voice Quality: Past, Present, and Future , 2010 .