BUCKLING DESIGN STUDIES OF INVERTED, OBLATE BULKHEADS FOR A PROPELLANT TANK

An investigation of the deformation and buckling characteristics of a composite, oblate bulkhead that has an inverted geometry and is subjected to pressure-only loading is presented for three bulkhead geometries and thicknesses. The effects of a stiffening support ring at the bulkhead to cylinder interface are also evaluated. Buckling analyses conducted using the axisymmetric shell code BOSOR4 are discussed for several bulkhead configurations. These results are analytically verified using results from the Structural Analysis of General Shells (STAGS) code for a selected bulkhead configuration. The buckling characterization of an inverted, oblate bulkhead requires careful attention as small changes in bulkhead parameters can have a significant effect on the critical buckling load. Comparison of BOSOR4 and STAGS results provided a very good correlation between the two analysis methods. In addition, the analysis code BOSOR4 was found to be an efficient sizing tool that is useful during the preliminary design stage of a practical shell structure. Together, these two aspects should give the design engineer confidence in sizing these stability critical structures. Additional characterization is warranted, especially for a composite tank structure, since only one bulkhead configuration was examined closely.

[1]  C. Ross,et al.  Dynamic buckling of thinwalled domes under external water pressure , 1989 .

[2]  D. Sisk.  Low profile bulkheads for launch vehicle propellant tanks - An optimum system solution , 1993 .

[3]  Jan Błachut.  Buckling of sharp knuckle torispheres under external pressure , 1998 .

[4]  D. N. Moreton,et al.  Buckling of near-perfect steel torispherical and hemispherical shells subjected to external pressure , 1990 .

[5]  Theodore A. Talay,et al.  Advanced manned launch system study status , 1991 .

[6]  Kathryn Wurster,et al.  The next generation manned launch system - A complex decision , 1993 .

[7]  Jan Błachut,et al.  Plastic Buckling of Imperfect Hemispherical Shells Subjected to External Pressure , 1987 .

[8]  J. Finckenor,et al.  CORSSTOL: Cylinder Optimization of Rings, Skin, and Stringers with Tolerance sensitivity , 1970 .

[9]  Walter Wunderlich,et al.  Imperfection sensitivity of elastic and elastic-plastic torispherical pressure vessel heads , 1994 .

[10]  N. Huang,et al.  Unsymmetrical Buckling of Thin Shallow Spherical Shells , 1964 .

[11]  Wu K. Chauncey,et al.  Nontangent, Developed Contour Bulkheads for a Wing-Body Single Stage Launch Vehicle , 1999 .

[12]  Y. Fung,et al.  A nonlinear theory of bending and buckling of thin elastic shallow spherical shells , 1954 .

[13]  Edward O. Jones.  The Effects of External Pressure on Thin-Shell Pressure Vessel Heads , 1962 .

[14]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Single stage rocket options for future launch vehicles , 1993 .

[15]  David Bushnell.  Stress, Stability, and Vibration of Complex Branched Shells of Revolution: Analysis and User's Manual for BOSOR4 , 1972 .

[16]  A. E. Johnson,et al.  Experimental investigation of the buckling instability of monocoque shells , 1961 .

[17]  Jan Błachut,et al.  Clamped torispherical shells under external pressure — some new results , 1988 .

[18]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Comparison of two multidisciplinary optimization strategies for launch-vehicle design , 1995 .

[19]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Imperfection Sensitivity of Externally Pressurized Spherical Shells , 1967 .

[20]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Aerodynamic configuration design using response surface methodology analysis , 1993 .

[21]  E. Corona,et al.  Dome Reversal of Metal Beverage Containers , 1998 .