Social Influence of an International Celebrity: Responses to the Death of Princess Diana

When Diana, Princess of Wales, was killed in 1997, a massive public outpouring of grief occurred. Six years after her death, the public and the tabloids still debate whether the paparazzi were to blame for her fatal car accident. Previous studies of celebrities suggest that psychological involvement with a celebrity will determine to what extent stories of the celebrity and their subsequent social influence will affect the general public. The same process was examined in this study of Princess Diana. To study this phenomenon, a survey administered immediately after her fatal car accident compared people's level of involvement with Princess Diana to their viewing of stories about her funeral and their attitudes toward the press. Results showed that gender and age similarities predicted involvement with Princess Diana. This involvement, in turn, predicted people's media use in response to her death and their attitudes toward the press. This finding reinforces previous studies that have shown involvement is an important variable that influences both media consumption and media effects. The authors consider implications of this research for investigating the growing international influence of celebrities through mass media.

[1]  L. B. Rosenfeld.  Set theory: Key to the understanding, of Kenneth Burke's use of the term “identification” , 1969 .

[2]  W. Brown,et al.  Media, Celebrities, and Social Influence: Identification With Elvis Presley , 2002 .

[3]  R. Daft,et al.  The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill , 1988 .

[4]  D. Horton,et al.  Mass communication and para-social interaction; observations on intimacy at a distance. , 1956, Psychiatry.

[5]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[6]  Barbara A. Lafferty,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands , 2000 .

[7]  William J. Brown,et al.  Marketing AIDS Prevention: The Differential Impact Hypothesis Versus Identification Effects , 1997 .

[8]  Z. Luria,et al.  Sex-Role Learning: A Test of the Selective Attention Hypothesis. , 1978 .

[9]  Bill D. Moyers,et al.  The Power of Myth , 1988 .

[10]  Raymie E. McKerrow.  Truman and Korea: Rhetoric in the pursuit of victory , 1977 .

[11]  H. Kelman.  PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reconstructing the story of Simplemente Maria, the most popular telenovela in Latin America of all time , 1995 .

[13]  George Cheney,et al.  On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification , 1983 .

[14]  William J. Brown,et al.  Differences in Univariate Values versus Multivariate Relationships: Findings from a Study of Diana, Princess of Wales. , 2002 .

[15]  M. Basil,et al.  The Influence of Famous Athletes on Health Beliefs and Practices: Mark McGwire, Child Abuse Prevention, and Androstenedione , 2003, Journal of health communication.

[16]  A. Rubin,et al.  Audience Activity and Soap Opera Involvement: A Uses and Effects Investigation. , 1987 .

[17]  Laura Leets,et al.  Fans Exploring Expressed Motivations for Contacting Celebrities , 1995 .

[18]  J. Gamson.  Claims to Fame: Celebrity in Contemporary America , 1994 .

[19]  James J. Duane,et al.  Media coverage and public opinion of the O. J. Simpson trial: Implications for the criminal justice system , 1997 .

[20]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[21]  A. Rubin,et al.  LONELINESS, PARASOCIAL INTERACTION, AND LOCAL TELEVISION NEWS VIEWING , 1985 .

[22]  Michael D. Basil,et al.  Identification as a mediator of celebrity effects , 1996 .

[23]  M. Basil,et al.  Interpersonal Communication in News Diffusion: A Study of “Magic” Johnson's Announcement , 1994 .

[24]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[25]  Susan D. Boon,et al.  Admirer-celebrity relationships among young adults : Explaining perceptions of celebrity influence on identity , 2001 .

[26]  H. Lasswell,et al.  World Politics and Personal Insecurity , 1966 .

[27]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[28]  W J Brown,et al.  Effects of a prosocial television soap opera in promoting women's status. , 1991, Human communication research.

[29]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[30]  Annabel M. Johnson,et al.  A Primary- and Second-Order Component Analysis of the Organizational Identification Questionnaire , 1999 .

[31]  M. R. Levy,et al.  Watching TV news as para‐social interaction , 1979 .

[32]  K. Burke.  A Rhetoric of Motives , 1969 .

[33]  E. Rogers,et al.  Entertainment-Education: A Communication Strategy for Social Change , 1999 .

[34]  D. Boorstin.  The image : a guide to pseudo-events in America , 1992 .

[35]  R. Rubin,et al.  Development of parasocial interaction relationships , 1987 .

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  William J. Brown,et al.  Media Celebrities and Public Health: Responses to 'Magic' Johnson's HIV Disclosure and Its Impact on AIDS Risk and High-Risk Behaviors , 1995 .

[38]  D. Shaw,et al.  The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas , 1993 .

[39]  Phillip K. Tompkins,et al.  Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment , 1987 .