Evaluation of Measures of Technical Image Quality for Intracranial Magnetic Resonance Angiography

We evaluate three measures of technical image quality for intracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): (1) a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) evaluation of vessel visibility, (2) vessel-to-background signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR), and (3) observer ranking of the fidelity of vessel morphology compared to that in a gold standard image. The gold standard used for both the 2AFC and ranking measures is intraarterial catheter angiography. These measures are applied to healthy arterial segments. The 2AFC and SDNR measures directly evaluate the visibility of artery segments for which the existence is known from the gold standard images. We argue that (1) 2AFC evaluates the carrier signals on which any vascular disease process is modulated and provides an upper bound on the detectibility of vascular lesions, (2) SDNR is a predictor of 2AFC, and (3) ranking may be used to predict the relative performance of techniques in the detection of vascular lesions.

[1]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[2]  J. Swets.  ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[3]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[4]  William A. Murphy,et al.  RSNA scientific program : advice to authors and registrants, program enhancements, and research training awards , 1993 .

[5]  D. Parker,et al.  Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio Measurements in Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[6]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  D. Parker,et al.  The Voxel Sensitivity Function in Fourier Transform Imaging: Applications to Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  H B BARLOW,et al.  Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  A. Rose,et al.  Vision: human and electronic , 1973 .

[10]  D. Parker,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of cerebral arteries. A review. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[11]  D L Parker,et al.  Intracranial black‐blood MR angiography with high‐resolution 3D fast spin echo , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[13]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[14]  R. Henkelman.  Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[15]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993 .

[16]  C. Metz.  Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[17]  A. Burgess.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[18]  D L Parker,et al.  Experimental and theoretical studies of vessel contrast‐to‐noise ratio in intracranial time‐of‐flight MR angiography , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Contrast thresholds of the human eye. , 1946, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[20]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Linear discriminants and image quality , 1991, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  J Hua,et al.  Noise and artifact comparison for Fourier and polynomial phase correction used with Fourier reconstruction of asymmetric data sets , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  D Chien,et al.  Improved time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain with magnetization transfer contrast. , 1992, Radiology.

[23]  D. Parker,et al.  A quantitative study of ramped radio frequency, magnetization transfer, and slab thickness in three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in a patient population. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[24]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays , 1997 .

[25]  Dennis G. Fryback,et al.  The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[26]  D L Parker,et al.  Vessel enhancement filtering in three‐dimensional MR angiography , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  D L Parker,et al.  Observer performance methodologies for evaluating blood vessel visibility in MR angiograms using accurate geometric registration to high resolution x‐ray angiograms , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.