Consequences for healthcare quality and research of the exclusion of records from the Death Master File.

> In November 2011, the Social Security Administration removed ≈5% of death records from its Death Master File and started excluding ≈40% of new death records, having determined that data submitted electronically by states cannot be publicly shared. Before this determination, the Death Master File provided an accessible source of national vital status data with a short time lag and high specificity and sensitivity and was routinely used by healthcare researchers and hospitals to determine study participants’ survival and to monitor postdischarge outcomes. Its effective loss means comparative effectiveness studies will be unnecessarily delayed, more costly, or unfeasible. Likewise, timely identification and correction of poor hospital performance will be more difficult, undermining the safety and quality of care and threatening hospital financing as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid launch the Readmissions Reduction Program in October 2012 and link reimbursement to 30-day mortality under the Value-Based Purchasing Program in 2013. In summary, the action of the Social Security Administration will substantially hamper healthcare research and quality. We describe the origins of the Death Master File and the basis for excluding electronically submitted state data. We then examine the consequences for healthcare research and operations, consider alternative sources, and evaluate possible mechanisms to restore a timely national data source. On November 1, 2011, the Social Security Administration (SSA) removed ≈5% of the data in its publicly available Death Master File (DMF) and stopped reporting ≈40% of new deaths.1 The SSA explained that it had determined that §205(r) of the Social Security Act (added by the Act of April 20, 1983)2 prohibits the disclosure of state records that the SSA has been including in the public version of the DMF since 2002.1 This is a “demise of a vital resource”3 that will hamper healthcare outcomes research, as well as …

[1]  M Habibi,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  S. Normand,et al.  Comparison of Hospital Risk-Standardized Mortality Rates Calculated by Using In-Hospital and 30-Day Models: An Observational Study With Implications for Hospital Profiling , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  E. Blackstone Demise of a vital resource. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services Medicare and Medicaid programs: hospital outpatient prospective payment; ambulatory surgical center payment; hospital value-based purchasing program; physician self-referral; and patient notification requirements in provider agreements. Final rule with comment period. , 2011, Federal register.

[5]  J. Nessler,et al.  Reduced Thrombin Formation and Altered Fibrin Clot Properties Induced by Polyunsaturated Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Top of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OMEGA-PCI Clot) , 2011, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[6]  F. Tritto,et al.  N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces post-operative atrial fibrillation incidence in patients undergoing "on-pump" coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2011, Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace.

[7]  C. Yancy,et al.  Impact of a standardized heart failure order set on mortality, readmission, and quality and costs of care. , 2010, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[8]  D. Ballard,et al.  Implementing a standardized order set for community-acquired pneumonia: impact on mortality and cost. , 2009, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[9]  K. Eagle,et al.  Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 2009 .

[10]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Empowering a database with national long-term data about mortality: the use of national death registries , 2008, Cardiology in the Young.

[11]  Suzanne L. Holcombe National Technical Information Service , 2008 .

[12]  Charles Maynard,et al.  A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases. , 2002, Annals of epidemiology.

[13]  Clyde Woods Life After Death , 2002 .

[14]  T. Hauser,et al.  Accuracy of on-line databases in determining vital status. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  N. Caporaso,et al.  Ascertainment of mortality in the U.S. veteran population: World War II veteran twins. , 1995, Military medicine.

[16]  D. Friday,et al.  Committee on Ways and Means , 1992 .

[17]  B. Macmahon The National Death Index. , 1983, American journal of public health.

[18]  S. Dickman,et al.  Life after 'death' , 1990, Nature.