Haptic Information Access Using Touchscreen Devices: Design Guidelines for Accurate Perception of Angular Magnitude and Line Orientation

The overarching goal of our research program is to address the long-standing issue of non-visual graphical accessibility for blind and visually-impaired (BVI) people through development of a robust, low-cost solution. This paper contributes to our research agenda aimed at studying key usability parameters governing accurate rendering and perception of haptically-accessed graphical materials via commercial touchscreen-based smart devices, such as smart phones and tablets. The current work builds on the findings from our earlier studies by empirically investigating the minimum angular magnitude that must be maintained for accurate detection and angular judgment of oriented vibrotactile lines. To assess the minimum perceivable angular magnitude (i.e., cord length) between oriented lines, a psychophysically-motivated usability experiment was conducted that compared accuracy in oriented line detection across four angles (2°, 5°, 9°, and 22°) and two radiuses (1-in. and 2-in.). Results revealed that a minimum 4 mm cord length (which corresponds to 5° at a 1-in. radius and 2° at a 2-in. radius) must be maintained between oriented lines for supporting accurate haptic perception via vibrotactile cuing. Findings provide foundational guidelines for converting/rendering oriented lines on touchscreen devices for supporting haptic information access based on vibrotactile stimuli.

[1]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Introduction ASSETS’10 Special Issue , 2011, TACC.

[2]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  Evaluation of non-visual panning operations using touch-screen devices , 2014, ASSETS.

[3]  Roberta L Klatzky,et al.  Visual, tangible, and touch-screen: Comparison of platforms for displaying simple graphics , 2016, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[4]  Martin Pielot,et al.  TouchOver map: audio-tactile exploration of interactive maps , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[5]  Eyal de Lara,et al.  Timbremap: enabling the visually-impaired to use maps on touch-enabled devices , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Christopher R. Bennett,et al.  Touch-screen technology for the dynamic display of -2D spatial information without vision: promise and progress. , 2014, Multisensory research.

[7]  J. Craig,et al.  Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity. , 1999, Somatosensory & motor research.

[8]  Hari Prasath Palani Making Graphical Information Accessible Without Vision Using Touch-based Devices , 2013 .

[9]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  Evaluation of Non-visual Zooming Operations on Touchscreen Devices , 2016, HCI.

[10]  Jenna L. Gorlewicz,et al.  Toward Non-visual Graphics Representations on Vibratory Touchscreens: Shape Exploration and Identification , 2016, EuroHaptics.

[11]  A GiudiceNicholas,et al.  Principles for Designing Large-Format Refreshable Haptic Graphics Using Touchscreen Devices , 2017 .

[12]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Evaluating Haptic and Auditory Directional Guidance to Assist Blind People in Reading Printed Text Using Finger-Mounted Cameras , 2016, ACM Trans. Access. Comput..

[13]  S. Appelle Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Gabriel Baud-Bovy,et al.  The perception and representation of orientations: a study in the haptic modality. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[15]  Kim Marriott,et al.  GraVVITAS: Generic Multi-touch Presentation of Accessible Graphics , 2011, INTERACT.

[16]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  Learning non-visual graphical information using a touch-based vibro-audio interface , 2012, ASSETS '12.

[17]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Exploring affective communication through variable-friction surface haptics , 2014, CHI.

[18]  Eelke Folmer,et al.  Accessible Touchscreen Technology for People with Visual Impairments , 2017, ACM Trans. Access. Comput..

[19]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[20]  R. Klatzky,et al.  - Sensory Substitution of Vision: Importance of Perceptual and Cognitive Processing , 2018, Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision.

[21]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Representing users in accessibility research , 2012, TACC.

[22]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  Principles for Designing Large-Format Refreshable Haptic Graphics Using Touchscreen Devices , 2017, ACM Trans. Access. Comput..

[24]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Designing Media for Visually-Impaired Users of Refreshable Touch Displays: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[25]  K O Johnson,et al.  The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans , 1994, Neurology.

[26]  Monoj Kumar Raja,et al.  The Development and Validation of a New Smartphone Based Non-visual Spatial Interface for Learning Indoor Layouts , 2011 .

[27]  Christian Graf Schematisation in hard-copy tactile orientation maps , 2013 .

[28]  K O Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.