LIMBIC INFLUENCES ON HUMAN SPEECH *

The history of the modern study of human communicative disorders began in the latter half of the last century with the studies of Broca,' of Wemicke.2 and of other neurologists. Their discovery and description of critical areas of neocortex located in a dominant hemisphere set the context of discussion and theory for the next one hundred years. Studies and experiments on human speech have, to a large extent, been confined to these areas of the neocortex and to their relationship to human propositional speech. Apparently forgotten for many years has been the comparative neurology of vocalization and vocal communication. It is known now that animal vocalization is generated and supported by tissue lying exclusively, or nearly so, within the limbic system. But, at the time of the discoveries of Broca and Wernicke. this was not known. The limbic system was not yet defined, and techniques for studying the subcortical and basal parts of the brain were a number of years away. Therefore, most workers assumed that the neural apparatus supporting animal vocalization was related to the human speech areas, that the latter developed or evolved out of the former, and that human speech was itself a highly developed form of animal vocalization. However, evidence gathered in the past fifteen years has suggested strongly that animal vocal communication is limbic in origin334 and that human speech arose from new If this is true, and if human speech did not evolve out of animal vocalization but represents an independent development, it then becomes important to inquire whether the limbic system, essential for vocal communication in subhuman species, has lost this function in man or whether it still plays a significant role in human communication.

[1]  L. Stein,et al.  Nerve Growth Factor: Enhanced Recovery of Feeding after Hypothalamic Damage , 1973, Science.

[2]  B. W. Robinson Vocalization evoked from forebrain in Macaca mulatta , 1967 .

[3]  A. Smith Speech and other functions after left (dominant) hemispherectomy. , 1966, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  K. Lashley,et al.  The survival of the maze habit after cerebellar injuries. , 1926 .

[5]  W. Nauta,et al.  Projections of the lentiform nucleus in the monkey. , 1966, Brain research.

[6]  L. Guth Regeneration in the mammalian peripheral nervous system. , 1956, Physiological reviews.

[7]  Kurt Goldstein Die transkortikalen Aphasien , 1915 .

[8]  B. W. Robinson,et al.  Dominance reversal resulting from aggressive responses evoked by brain telestimulation , 1969 .

[9]  P.I.Y. The Neuroanatomical Basis of Clinical Neurology , 1962, Neurology.

[10]  T. Rasmussen,et al.  INTRACAROTID SODIUM AMYTAL FOR THE LATERALIZATION OF CEREBRAL SPEECH DOMINANCE; OBSERVATIONS IN 123 PATIENTS. , 1964, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  S. Cobb Speech and Brain-Mechanisms. , 1960 .

[12]  W. Nauta,et al.  Neural associations of the amygdaloid complex in the monkey. , 1962, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  P. Maclean Some psychiatric implications of physiological studies on frontotemporal portion of limbic system (visceral brain). , 1952, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  H. Liepmann Drei Aufsätze aus dem Apraxiegebiet , 1908 .

[15]  G. H. Monrad‐Krohn,et al.  ON THE DISSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AND EMOTIONAL INNERVATION IN FACIAL PARESIS OF CENTRAL ORIGIN , 1924 .

[16]  R. Joynt Paul Pierre Broca: His Contribution to the Knowledge of Aphasia , 1964 .

[17]  Walle J. H. Nauta,et al.  An anatomical analysis of the non-specific thalamic projection system , 1954 .

[18]  Walle J. H. Nauta,et al.  Some ascending pathways in the brain stem reticular formation. , 1958 .

[19]  W. E. Stern RESTORATION OF FUNCTION AFTER BRAIN INJURY. , 1964 .

[20]  James L Olds,et al.  Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  D B DESAI,et al.  Traumatic aphasia. , 1947, The Antiseptic.

[23]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Vernon B. Mountcasle,et al.  Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance , 1964 .

[25]  M. Silverman,et al.  Speech therapy and language recovery in severe aphasia. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  K. Gloning,et al.  Comparison of verbal behavior in right-handed and non right-handed patients with anatomically verified lesion of one hemisphere. , 1969, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[27]  G. Lynch,et al.  Synaptic rearrangement in the dentate gyrus: histochemical evidence of adjustments after lesions in immature and adult rats. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  P. Maclean The limbic system with respect to self-preservation and the preservation of the species. , 1958, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[29]  T. Rasmussen,et al.  INTRACAROTID INJECTION OF SODIUM AMYTAL FOR THE LATERALIZATION OF CEREBRAL SPEECH DOMINANCE EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS , 1960 .

[30]  S. D. Glick Changes in amphetamine sensitivity following frontal cortical damage in rats and mice. , 1972, European journal of pharmacology.

[31]  N. Butters,et al.  Plasticity and recovery of function in the central nervous system;: Proceedings of a conference held at Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, September 24-September 26, 1973 , 1974 .

[32]  P. Broca,et al.  Anatomie comparée des circonvolutions cérébrales : le grand lobe limbique et la scissure limbique dans la série des mammifères , 1878 .

[33]  C. W. Watson,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ANTICONVULSANT DRUGS ON RECOVERY OF FUNCTION FOLLOWING CEREBRAL CORTICAL LESIONS , 1945 .

[34]  J. Jackson On the nature of the duality of the brain. , 1874 .