Addressing a standards creation process: a focus on ebXML

Current trends in e-business are creating opportunities for automation of business processes across business boundaries. However, lack of standards has caused difficulties for industry players in exploiting resources and coordinating activities in the context of e-business. ebXML--an emerging e-business standard framework to unite competing factions under a banner of international trade--has been developed within an industry consortium using an open, collaborative process with no barriers to entry, whose approach is very different from traditional approach to create standards. Drawing on socio-technological perspective, this paper attempts to gain deeper understanding of such phenomenon by using a case study methodology. This paper uses data drawn mostly from email discussions and minutes of teleconference and face-to-face meeting. Our exploration of the ebXML standardization process generates specific propositions. In summary, our analysis found that the 'openness' of standardization process helps to create a more comprehensive standard than proprietary standards--effectively leading to convergence of technologies, and that the unfolding dynamics of standardization process varies depending on the characteristics of standards to be developed. We also discuss user participation as an important factor that influences the dynamics of standardization process in such an open, collaborative standardization process. Surprisingly, user participation seems to be more effective in creating technical infrastructure oriented standards rather than business process oriented standards.

[1]  H. Varian,et al.  The Art of Standards Wars , 1999 .

[2]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[3]  K. R. Conner,et al.  Obtaining Strategic Advantage from Being Imitated: When Can Encouraging Clones Pay? , 1995 .

[4]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[5]  R. Bales,et al.  Symlog, A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups , 1979 .

[6]  Peter Grindley,et al.  Standards, strategy, and policy : cases and stories , 2000 .

[7]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[8]  R. Cornes,et al.  The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods. 2nd. ed. , 1996 .

[9]  R. Hawkins,et al.  The rise of consortia in the information and communication technology industries: emerging implications for policy , 1999 .

[10]  Martin B. H. Weiss,et al.  Consortia in the Standards Development Process. , 1992 .

[11]  Martin B. H. Weiss,et al.  Compatibility standards and product development strategy: a review of data modem developments , 1991 .

[12]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[13]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[14]  L. Hallén,et al.  Interfirm Adaptation in Business Relationships , 1991 .

[15]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[16]  Rob Procter,et al.  User participation in standards setting—the panacea? , 1998, STAN.

[17]  Martin B. H. Weiss,et al.  The standards development process: a view from political theory , 1993, STAN.

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[19]  Paul A. David,et al.  Formal standards-setting for global telecommunications and information services. Towards an institutional regime transformation? , 1996 .

[20]  Carl Christian,et al.  The Costs of Substitution , 1984 .

[21]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[22]  James H. Burrows,et al.  Information technology standards in a changing world: the role of the users , 1999 .

[23]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation policy and the economy , 2001 .

[24]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Technological Choice in Voluntary Standards Committees: An Empirical Analysis. , 1990 .

[25]  C. Kindleberger.  Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods , 1983 .

[26]  M. Sirbu,et al.  Standards setting for computer communication: The case of X.25 , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[27]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[28]  R. Bales.  Interaction process analysis , 1976 .

[29]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[30]  Akio Tojo,et al.  The SSI story what it is, and how it was stalled and eliminated in the International Standardization arena , 1993 .

[31]  Todd Sandler,et al.  The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods , 1986 .

[32]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[33]  Rob Procter,et al.  Users and standardization—worlds apart? The example of electronic mail , 1996, STAN.

[34]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[35]  L. C. Verman,et al.  Standardization, a new discipline, , 1973 .

[36]  D. Linda Garcia,et al.  Standard Setting in the United States: Public and Private Sector Roles , 1992 .

[37]  R. Cowan.  Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.

[38]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[39]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[40]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[41]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[42]  Ian Miles,et al.  Standards, selection and variety: an evolutionary approach , 1994 .

[43]  Suresh K. Damodaran,et al.  ebXML: Concepts and Application , 2002 .

[44]  Eric Chiu.  ebXML Simplified: A Guide to the New Standard for Global E-Commerce , 2002 .

[45]  J. Ford,et al.  The Role Of Conversations in Producing Intentional Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[46]  Cris Kobryn.  UML 2001: a standardization odyssey , 1999, CACM.

[47]  P. Klemperer.  The Competitiveness of Markets with Switching Costs , 1987 .

[48]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[49]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[50]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Generalized approach to modeling negotiations , 1986 .

[51]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[52]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[53]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Evolution of Collective Strategies among Organizations , 2000 .

[54]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[55]  Mark I. Marpet.  An Ethical Issue in Voluntary-Consensus-Standards Development: A Decision-Science View , 1998 .